-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Why? Inline is simple and effective. I'm curious as to why you feel MIME is so much better.
- --Avi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.77 Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/4xJrs iJgEAREKAEAFAk1psE85GGh0dHA6Ly9wZ3AubmljLmFkLmpwL3Brcy9sb29rdXA/ b3A9Z2V0JnNlYXJjaD0weEY4MEUyOUY5AAoJEA1isBn4Din5lgMA/AwKVfy+zUNF fXBiFZ47w1AFMs8s5VNr6t8P7Jg6/H74AP9ju6yMftOZH3Ee5v7ZQfCnQ3OlkwuR +fgcgWT+PCJuzA== =HdOG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---- User:Avraham pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key) <avi.w...@gmail.com > Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E 29F9 From: Martin Gollowitzer <go...@fsfe.org> > To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org > Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:56:21 +0100 > Subject: Re: PGP/MIME considered harmful for mobile (Jameson Rollins) > * Avi <avi.w...@gmail.com> [110225 19:21]: > > For those of us who use webmail, inline signatures are rather > > useful. > > There are webmail applications supporting PGP/MIME. If yours doesn't, it > is not a good one. Inline signatures are not a good thing IMHO. > > Martin >
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
