-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 For those of us who use webmail, inline signatures are rather useful.
- -- Avi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.77 Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/4xJrs iJgEAREKAEAFAk1n8lg5GGh0dHA6Ly9wZ3AubmljLmFkLmpwL3Brcy9sb29rdXA/ b3A9Z2V0JnNlYXJjaD0weEY4MEUyOUY5AAoJEA1isBn4Din59XYA/18e3tB5ojsl lBpatsKCjKmUhXjusYXtsxv/zIcgQsbYAP9YAdU2WDym1JMXDd2tOV4/8ObwDlqu 5nkIM2o1PuKoZg== =NAhh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---- User:Avraham pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key) <avi.w...@gmail.com > Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E 29F9 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jameson Rollins <jroll...@finestructure.net> > To: "Robert J. Hansen" <r...@sixdemonbag.org>, gnupg-users@gnupg.org > Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:45:03 -0800 > Subject: Re: PGP/MIME considered harmful for mobile > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:22:03 -0500, "Robert J. Hansen" < > r...@sixdemonbag.org> wrote: > > Just as an FYI to the list -- > > > > On Android's mail application, PGP/MIME attachments are nigh-unusable. > > It won't render even the plaintext portions: it has to be downloaded and > > opened with a text reader. If you're concerned about your mail being > > readable on a mobile device (which is increasingly important nowadays), > > you might want to consider switching to inline signatures. > > Yikes! I thought we were almost done killing inline signatures! Don't > revive it now! >
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
