On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 08:38 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > I am using Ubuntu 8.04
>
> Right. Debian and Ubuntu don't ship with HBCI support enabled
> due to theoretical license issues.
This is no longer true in Debian unstable and testing. As I reported a
few months ago, we now have a GPL compa
This is in re the recent fix by Micha Lenk for the bug where gnucash
dealt badly with lock files in the case link returns ENOSYS.
I understand from the irc log that Derek thinks it is foolish to try the
copying method for most errors. I want to disagree strongly.
First, it is a rare case, and tr
I'm pleased to report that gnucash 2.2.6 transitioned into the upcoming
Debian release. Barring any major unforseen problems, this will be the
version that goes.
Thomas
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org
I was expecting the 2.2.6 release and I'm now quite nervous. The Debian
freeze has begun. If 2.2.6 shows up soon--really soon--then the release
team will probably allow it in. Otherwise, we will be stuck in one way
or another vis a vis HBCI support. Last email I saw on the subject had
a release
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 21:43 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Some German business users brought up a "feature" request that sounds a bit
> weird for a programmer: They asked for a gnucash mode of operation where the
> user can not edit older transactions anymore!
This is not just important fo
I have received helpful assurances from the OFX consortium about the
interpretation of the license on the OFX DTDs, and with that included,
the Debian ftpmasters have agreed that the result is indeed a free
software license.
That returns us to the status quo ante.
Thomas
___
There is good news. Things are not yet certainly happy, but they are
much happier than I earlier thought they would be. I'm awaiting some
guidance from the Debian FTP masters on the question, but I have
received guidance from the OFX group which clarifies the license in such
a way that it seems (
Can we consider, on the next release of gnucash-docs, using a more
recent version of the GFDL?
Thomas
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
In the Transactions:Scheduled Transactions chapter of the manual there
is a typo:
This window may seem complicated but it's fairly eay to
^^^
understand.
See http://bugs.debian.org/459654.
Thomas
___
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 15:52 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> In fact, after thinking about it for a while, your idea with packaging
> libofx without the OFX DTDs sounds even worse for me. I mean, the
> whole point of libofx is processing OFX. Shipping it without that
> feature is like ship
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 20:08 -0500, Terry wrote:
> hmmm - noticed somethihng strange. slib supporrt is listed for guile
> 1.6, but not 1.8.
Can't speak to Ubuntu. I do know that on Debian it is true that the
guile-1.8 support for slib is not yet in place.
Thomas
__
On Sun, 2008-01-13 at 22:27 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> GnuCash has a built-in importer for OFX files in the src/import-export/ofx
> module. This importer requires libofx. If libofx is not available,
> the "Import OFX file" is no longer available. There are no plans by any of
> the curre
So the DTD files I previously mentioned for libofx are, as I also
previously mentioned, available for use in libofx, but are not actually
free software.
Importantly, the license from the ofx specification permits their use
only in software which conforms to the specification, and doesn't permit
th
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 13:31 -0500, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Two of the DTD files in libofx are of uncertain license status.
>
> ofx160.dtd has the following copyright notice:
>
> Open Financial Exchange DTD
> Copyright 1997, 1998, 1999 CheckFree Corp., Intuit Inc.
Two of the DTD files in libofx are of uncertain license status.
ofx160.dtd has the following copyright notice:
Open Financial Exchange DTD
Copyright 1997, 1998, 1999 CheckFree Corp., Intuit Inc., Microsoft
Corp.
All rights reserved
and ofx201.dtd has this:
* Copyright 1997, 1998, 1999, 20
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 21:36 +0100, John Sved wrote:
> I wrote about this problem in September.I am trying to get away
> from Moneyplex and have been using GnuCash for a couple of years off-line.
>
> So I tried to get the HBCI function going on the openSuSE 10.2 i586
> RPM. No success via th
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 23:40 -0500, Tim Wunder wrote:
>
> You asked why direct connect would be used. I answered with my use case. If
> that doesn't suit you, so be it. It /helps/ me keep a better eye on my credit
> card than keying in paper receipts did.
Apparently the conversation has gotten
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 23:13 -0500, Tim Wunder wrote:
> I used to save my credit card receipts and enter them manually. Now I import
> them. Much easier to download transactions than to key them in every week (or
> so). As a result, I stay more current and gnucash's balance matches the
> credit c
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 12:45 +0900, Ian Lewis wrote:
> How do you keep your own records? I don't keep these in gnucash.
The account register for my checking account functions in just the way I
would use a paper checkbook. I enter transactions into gnucash just as
I would enter them in a paper ch
On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 10:28 +0900, Ian Lewis wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> Using Direct Connect and importing of QIF files etc. are simply there
> so you can import the transactions from your bank without having to
> enter them by hand. This can be a real time saver and doesn't really
> affect reconciliat
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 17:31 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> It's intuitively obvious what happens in these two cases. ;)
> Seriously, a novice user shouldn't care about it, and if you want
> to do it you probably already know what it's for.
Actually, I haven't got a clue.
Does it just enter transa
I understand what happens if I import a QIF to start a new set of
accounts: the wizard works with me to figure out what the file says, and
then sets up accounts.
But I haven't got a clue what happens if I import a file from my bank.
Why would I want to? What would happen? The documentation assum
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 22:23 -0500, Tim Wunder wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 December 2007 05:21:06 pm Derek Atkins wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Over this weekend I implemented a simple book closing feature
> > that lets you zeroize the Income and Expense accounts into
> > Equity. It's comprised of changeset
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 07:59 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> packaging for debian is probably beyond the scope of this list (unless
> Thomas Bushnell is watching).
He is.
> > While I am not an expert in building debian packages, i feel certain that
> > building a source tree into a package
On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 12:31 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> But if gnucash was ALWAYS RUNNING, then what's the difference? in
> other words, instead of:
>
> 1) Start gnucash
> 2) Wait for it to start
> 3) Enter a couple transactions
> 4) Save
> 5) Exit gnucash
> 6) Repeat from #1
>
> Why n
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 15:44 +0200, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Do you have any suggestions to improve the wording in our announcements in
> order to avoid further problems with ambiguous message? That would be very
> helpful.
Spell out in excruciating detail the different circumstances and exact
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 20:05 -0400, Josh Sled wrote:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> It's the second of those two interpretations. And it's
> >> only a problem for people using scheduled transactions.
> >
> > Ok, then next q
> It's the second of those two interpretations. And it's
> only a problem for people using scheduled transactions.
Ok, then next question. What exactly happens if a user tries to load a
new-format file into an old gnucash?
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
> *DATA FILE NOTICE* If you are using Scheduled Transactions, the data
> file saved by GnuCash 2.1.2 and higher is *NOT* backward-compatible with
> GnuCash 2.0 anymore. Please make a safe backup of your 2.0 data before
> upgrading to 2.1.2.
This kind of announcement is extremely problematic fr
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 11:54 -0400, Ariel wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2007, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 16:53 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >> I dont like this patch. Sometimes I start gnucash before
> >> I remember to mount my encrypt
On Sun, 2007-05-13 at 16:53 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> I dont like this patch. Sometimes I start gnucash before
> I remember to mount my encrypted partition. GnuCash happily
> warns me that the file isn't there and I can then quit, mount
> the partition, and then re-start gnucash. If gnucash
I am pleased to report that the Debian release manager has approved
gnucash 2.0.5 for etch.
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 11:04 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> I'm sorry, I was incorrect.. The format WILL have the list of changed
> files (as you can see from Josh's email).
How about making the individual entries have the information the Coding
Standards call for? (function and variable names, espec
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 20:13 -0500, Josh Sled wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 20:06 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > As of 2.2 the plan is to automate the ChangeLog entries as part
> > of "make dist". This still wont have the per-file information you
> > seem to want, but I believe the format does hav
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 20:06 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> As of 2.2 the plan is to automate the ChangeLog entries as part
> of "make dist". This still wont have the per-file information you
> seem to want, but I believe the format does have revision numbers
> which allows for easily looking up t
There is a reason the GNU Coding Standards call for ChangeLogs. It's so
that people who have the source can use them to understand the source.
It's a crucial form of documentation.
Since 2.0.2, gnucash has apparently stopped keeping useful changelogs.
This is a serious annoyance. Can you please
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 16:04 -0500, Richard Kleeman wrote:
> OK thanks that is clear. Is there a reason Unstable has not updated for
> a considerable time? Is this the effect of the etch freeze or just that
> Thomas has been busy elsewhere?
It is the effect of the etch freeze; I posted a longer e
On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 12:48 -0500, Richard Kleeman wrote:
> Anyone know when the Debian testing will update from 2.0.2??
Currently Debian is in a freeze, preparing the next release of the
entire system, codenamed "etch".
Testing now only has updates which meet stringent criteria for inclusion
in
ver is
confusing and leading people to make this mistake so often in so many
different programs.
Thomas
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:26:13PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Hi Steve; you were very helpful with the last alpha bug reported by this
> submitter; I'm
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 15:58 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thomas Bushnell BSG schrieb:
> > On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 15:16 -0600, Jamuraa wrote:
> >> When putting in 12/23 or similar, I didn't get
> >>
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 15:16 -0600, Jamuraa wrote:
> I was putting my receipts in for the last half month or so recently
> and noticed that I had to be careful to notice the year that the
> receipts were in. When putting in 12/23 or similar, I didn't get
> December 23, 2006, but December 23, 2007.
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 00:53 -0500, David Reiser wrote:
> Well, there's some motion: glib2 2.12.7 now just throws a bunch of
>
> GLib-CRITICAL **: Invalid key name: Double Line Mode
>
> type errors on the terminal. But at least it reads and stores the
> preferences. 2.0.4 works normally with gli
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 11:21 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Samstag, 30. Dezember 2006 05:06 schrieb David Hampton:
> > On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 10:42 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > gnucash creates its own glib key files in ~/.gnucash/books. The keys
> > &
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 21:34 -0500, David Hampton wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 21:05 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> > 2) Change the code to retry-on-failure (so we'd have to try each read
> >and write twice).
> >
> > Although I prefer #1, David seems to prefer #2. He's doing the work so
> >
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 21:05 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> I know David Hampton is looking into it. Unfortunately there's not a
> good runtime check to test the running glib version.. The bastards
> decided to change the behavior mid-stream, without making it "easy" to
> detect the "broken" glib.
On Sat, 2006-12-30 at 18:00 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Hey,
>
> At this point all outstanding patches are sitting in the 2.0 branch,
> and a "distcheck" worked for me on FC5. Any chance you could push
> a 2.0.4 release soon? I think it's pretty important to push out a
> release due to bug #389
On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 23:06 -0500, David Hampton wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-12-29 at 10:42 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > gnucash creates its own glib key files in ~/.gnucash/books. The keys
> > used in these files are filled with spaces. Spaces are not allowed in
> >
gnucash creates its own glib key files in ~/.gnucash/books. The keys
used in these files are filled with spaces. Spaces are not allowed in
glib keys.
As of glib version 2.12.5, key names are being validated and errors
returned if invalid keys are used. This causes the stored data in
~/.gnucash/
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 17:33 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Please see Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/404585.
>
> Upstream glib version 2.12.5 decided to be more strict in handling input
> in gkeyfile.c, and this now causes problems.
>
> I am not sure which is the righ
Please see Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/404585.
Upstream glib version 2.12.5 decided to be more strict in handling input
in gkeyfile.c, and this now causes problems.
I am not sure which is the right course of action: fix gnucash to use
the new stricter syntax, or fix glib to be looser. The
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 11:05 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 06:07 +, Flavio Rump wrote:
> > Ok I have debian gnucash installed, but I want to run the svn build of
> > gnucash.
> >
> > So my problem with uninstalling slib 3a4 is not that
On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 06:07 +, Flavio Rump wrote:
> Ok I have debian gnucash installed, but I want to run the svn build of
> gnucash.
>
> So my problem with uninstalling slib 3a4 is not that gnucash depends on
> it, but guile!
>
> I haven't reported any bugs yet, but apparently it has been
On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 02:28 +, Flavio Rump wrote:
> Just saw that someone had already reported this and it is related to a
> slib bug.
>
> But I can't really downgruide slib because
>
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent removal of slib:
> gnucash depends on slib (>= 3a2-5).
> guile-1.6-sli
Is there an easy way to generate a list of which bugs have been fixed in
gnucash 2.0.3?
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailma
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 08:23 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 12:20:54AM -0500, Jerry Quinn wrote:
> > Derek Atkins wrote:
> > > This looks like the "slib 3a4 bug".. Try using slib 3a3
> >
> > Is this a bug in gnucash or slib? If slib, has it been reported yet?
> >
>
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 11:18 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Per Bojsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > *** Regarding Re: r15098 - gnucash/trunk/src/gnome-utils -
> > gnc_history_get_last() can return NULL.; Derek Atkins
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> adds:
> >
> > Derek> free() still doesn't check
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 22:07 -0500, Per Bojsen wrote:
> *** Regarding Re: r15098 - gnucash/trunk/src/gnome-utils -
> gnc_history_get_last() can return NULL.; Derek Atkins
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> adds:
>
> Derek> free() still doesn't check, but g_free() does.
>
> Actually at least on Linux, a
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, looks like they just released a new version of slib. I wonder
> if there's something about slib-3a4 that's different enough from slib-3a3
> that causes it to fail for you?
Slib 3a4 now includes in the guile.init file the /usr/lib/slib
directory name
Bret Busby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When will it be available as a .deb package, for Debian stable?
>
> The latest version apparently available for Debian stable, as a .deb
> pacakge, is 1.8.10-12 .
At least gnucash 2.0.1 will almost certainly be in the next Debian
stable release, with a ver
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for the error reports. This bug has been #1 on my hit-list for
> a while, but I hadn't been able to reproduce it. It turns out that
> the "unable to delete split" behavior was a big clue, and something I
> could finally reproduce. I'm hoping
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for the error reports. This bug has been #1 on my hit-list for
> a while, but I hadn't been able to reproduce it. It turns out that
> the "unable to delete split" behavior was a big clue, and something I
> could finally reproduce. I'm hoping
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for the error reports. This bug has been #1 on my hit-list for
> a while, but I hadn't been able to reproduce it. It turns out that
> the "unable to delete split" behavior was a big clue, and something I
> could finally reproduce. I'm hoping
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are clearly two different bugs here. One was there already.
> The one you're reporting, Thomas, is a regression from a patch that
> went into 2.0.2. Can you file a bugzilla report so we don't forget?
Done.
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 04:35:27PM +0200, Herbert Thoma wrote:
>> I can confirm this bug :-(
>>
>> And I got a crash when entering a new transaction, too.
>> I did not get a blank split line at the end of the
>> transaction in the auto-split mod
I always use auto-split, which may be relevant. This is with 2.0.2.
I create a new transaction, by filling in part of the memo field and
hitting tab. The details are all filled in, which include two debits
and a credit.
I try to delete one of the debits with "Delete Transaction" from the
right
Bret Busby wrote:
> When will it be available as a .deb package, for Debian stable?
2.0.1 is in etch now, so when etch releases, at least that will be
there. 2.0.2 has been uploaded to unstable, and I expect it will make
it into etch before release.
Thomas
__
I have just uploaded the new gnucash and gnucash-docs into Debian.
The etch release is coming up soon, and is perhaps entering freeze
this month. I gave the 2.0.2 release extra urgency because it
includes translation updates, and it will therefore very likely be in
the new release. People will b
Chris Lyttle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas, I'm sorry to have to tell you, but complaints about svn cruft in
> docs will be directed to /dev/null without a patch. I will look into it
> as soon as I find spare time to, but my life has gotten very busy lately
> so I can't say when that wil
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> gnucash: [M] "Found Finance::Quote version ""1.11"
I'm not sure why we see this; it's annoying and I wish it'd go away.
It's a best a minor bug, however.
> ** ERROR **: file split-register-load.c: line 248
>(gnc_split_register_load): assert
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> If 2.0.2 is released, it would be nice to release the documentation
>> package without the .svn grot that seems to creep in there all the
>> time.
>
> That
If 2.0.2 is released, it would be nice to release the documentation
package without the .svn grot that seems to creep in there all the
time.
Thomas
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnuc
On Tuesday, gnucash 2.0.1 packages migrated into the Debian testing
distribution, which means that (barring unforeseen problems) they will
be in the upcoming etch release. On behalf of a jillion Debian users,
thanks for all the hard work in making the 2.0 release happen.
Thomas
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Well, the fact that he doesn't control gnucash.org or any of the
>>> servers that run gnu
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, the fact that he doesn't control gnucash.org or any of the
> servers that run gnucash infrastructure I think would be a major
> impediment. Nothing would stop him from creating a fork, but I
> doubt anyone would follow there instead of using what
Here is a list of the differences between a successful Debian build of
gnucash for powerpc and for alpha. I have no idea which of these may
be significant, but perhaps one of them will produce an "aha! that
can't be right" from another developer.
The only thing that leaps out at me is that the a
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:14:05AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>>
>> There is a Debian maintainer with an alpha machine who can install the
>> gnucash build dependencies in a chroot on his machine. Since gnucash
>
Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It seems to me that this is a case where it is wise not to declare war
>> and wise not to declare marriage. War helps nobody, and marriage has
>> its risks too.
>
> I don't think it's constructive to frame the discussion this way.
I don't see why; if you
Forwarded at Josh's request.
--- Begin Message ---
[lists.gnucash.org and I are not on speaking terms at the moment; can
you forward my personal delivery of this message to you to gnucash-devel
on my behalf, please?]
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 19:49 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> It
There is a Debian maintainer with an alpha machine who can install the
gnucash build dependencies in a chroot on his machine. Since gnucash
fails utterly on alpha (with a crash as soon as a register is opened)
this seems worth investigating. I don't have time in the near future.
Is there a deve
It seems to me that this is a case where it is wise not to declare war
and wise not to declare marriage. War helps nobody, and marriage has
its risks too.
I have a lot of experience in dealing with RMS, and the very last
think we want to do is get into a conversation about the question "Is
GnuCa
Christian Stimming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It didn't occur to me that the current GnuCash project (read: the
> currently active developers) consider GnuCash as part of the GNU
> project or vice versa, or that it ever has been considered this
> way. I wouldn't understand if we added such a st
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Does anyone have any positive evidence of the new gnucash (post 1.8)
>> working on alpha? A debian user (bugs.debian.org/378346) gets a fatal
>> crash every time, a
Eric Hanchrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That last message was 90% pilot error -- I had failed to install the
> "guile-g-wrap" package. Once I installed that, the tests all pass.
>
> However, it'd have been nice if "configure" had warned me that
> guile-g-wrap was missing.
Or if Ubuntu would
Does anyone have any positive evidence of the new gnucash (post 1.8)
working on alpha? A debian user (bugs.debian.org/378346) gets a fatal
crash every time, and got such a crash with 1.9 as well. The 1.9
crash was mentioned on gnucash-user, but there was no list traffic
about it beyond the initi
Does anyone have any positive evidence of the new gnucash (post 1.8)
working on alpha? A debian user (bugs.debian.org/378346) gets a fatal
crash every time, and got such a crash with 1.9 as well. The 1.9
crash was mentioned on debian-user, but there was no list traffic
about it beyond the initia
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks, Thomas. For reference, where can I find out which arch's can
> and can't support GnuCash? I thought Debian ran on lots of strange
> archs that I'd never heard of running GnuCash. Are all these
> considered "current?" :
>
> [alpha] [amd64] [a
Gnucash 2.0.0 has been uploaded to Debian, and seems to have
successfully compiled on all current Debian archs that would be
capable of it. (One cannot support guile at present, so of course not
there.)
When the normal ten-day delay expires, if no Debian release-critical
bugs appear, it will mig
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Isn't that done specifically on by the .so version number? E.g.,
> When gnucash is linked against libgsf-1.so.113 doesn't that make
> the dependency explicit on packages that supply that version
> of libgsf-1?
No.
In the particular case, Debian gnucash
"Daniel Espinosa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I compile and install on a Ubuntu 6.06, the version 1.9.7, but it just shows
> the splash intent to open the main window but close inmediately with the
> next message:
>
> : In procedure scm-error in expression (scm-error (quote
> misc-error) #f ...)
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> gsf and gsf-gnome are certainly required.. They are used by libgoffice,
> which is the graphing library we use. You'll definitely need those.
> I don't know why it's trying to pull in libdbus or gnutls. Those must
> be indirect dependencies. As for th
digger vermont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry, I didn't state the issue properly. The distribution/release I'm
> using is Ubuntu Dapper. Though based on Debian there are differences in
> the way Ubuntu names some packages. Also it looks like some packages
> use a different versioning scheme
digger vermont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunately not that I can see in Ubuntu, and Debian's gnucash
> requires installing a good half dozen more Debian pkgs to fill
> dependencies. If there are Unbutu packages floating around they're most
> likely not for powerpc. Though I must say I h
Josh Sled <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Aye, we've taken a look at this bug in particular, and talked about the
> issue for a while. While all the accounting in bugzilla isn't squared
> away yet (funny, that), we've filed
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344219 , which is
> 2.0.0-targe
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can someone with clue take a look at http://bugs.debian.org/370502?
> I have requested more info from the submitter so that I can verify it
> and open it in bugzilla, but since it's a pretty serious issue, it
> might be valu
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
>>> Surely the .svn stuff does not belong in the gnucash-docs tarball?
>>
>> When I was building from SVN, it did
gnucash-docs 1.9.0 is now in Debian.
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Surely the .svn stuff does not belong in the gnucash-docs tarball?
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The first thing that comes to mind is "The QIF importer doesn't deal
> with charset/encoding and doesn't do any kind of conversion", which
> would mean that it's possible to push a non-utf8 character string into
> the data set through the importer. That
Can someone with clue take a look at http://bugs.debian.org/370502?
I have requested more info from the submitter so that I can verify it
and open it in bugzilla, but since it's a pretty serious issue, it
might be valuable if someone gets an immediate "aha!"
Thomas
___
I don't know how to submit bugs for gnucash other than by following
the link on the gnucash website. Said link is gone so long as the
website is (still) completely hosed.
I have some bug reports which may be easy to fix, and which are
important for the rollout of 2.0. I want to submit them so t
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
