On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 15:58 +0100, Christian Stimming wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Thomas Bushnell BSG schrieb: > > On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 15:16 -0600, Jamuraa wrote: > >> When putting in 12/23 or similar, I didn't get > >> December 23, 2006, but December 23, 2007. I thought this should be > >> different, so I dove into the gnucash code and changed qof_scan_date > >> slightly to choose the last year for December if the current month is > >> January. The patch is attached. > > > > This behavior has also always annoyed me. > > For the record, this behaviour does *not* annoy me. Instead, I would > rather be annoyed by gnucash starting to (apparently) guess some year > where I would rather want a clear, precise deterministic rule, easily > described by "the current year" and that's it.
All of the proposals being tossed about are both clear and deterministic. I agree that we want a clear and deterministic rule, but I reject the idea that "current year" is the only clear and deterministic rule. Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
