kosiew opened a new pull request, #16257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16257
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #16180.
## Rationale for this change
Intermittent test failures were observed in the `limit.slt` SQL logic test
file on the `main` b
xudong963 commented on issue #15771:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15771#issuecomment-2943445579
Test with datafusion-materialized-views ✅
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abov
alamb commented on issue #15182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15182#issuecomment-2943751488
FYI @andygrove / @mbutrovich in case you would like to add anything for
comet
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pl
alamb commented on issue #15182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15182#issuecomment-2943751090
Fyi @iffyio in case you would like to add anything for sqlparser
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
alamb commented on issue #15182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15182#issuecomment-2943751927
FYI @milenkovicm in case you would like to add anything for Ballista
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log o
ozankabak commented on PR #16196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16196#issuecomment-2943759107
> @ozankabak I still don't think you need all this API work since there's a
zero API change way to deal with cancellation already. Tests all pass with no
API changes in the 'all St
agis commented on issue #1548:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1548#issuecomment-2943739678
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1858 is also
related to this
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
sfluor commented on PR #16195:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16195#issuecomment-2943143826
There was one remaining test failing, I fixed it and updated the PR to the
latest branch. Should it target `main` or the `47` branch ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apach
eliaperantoni commented on issue #1548:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1548#issuecomment-2943240795
I noticed that `CASE .. END` expressions don't have correct spans because
the locations of the heading and trailing keywords are not considered. ie. the
follow
2010YOUY01 commented on PR #16255:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16255#issuecomment-2943542788
> LGTM Thank you @2010YOUY01 , i have minor question:
>
> Do we test before, does those BaselineMetrics will affect performance when
large data set?
Thanks for the re
pepijnve commented on PR #16196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16196#issuecomment-2943553646
@zhuqi-lucas FYI, I've reworked the 'infinite stream' to 'range stream' in
my tests. It simply emits a `Range` now. I've added an additional evil
test case for sort-merge join where
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #16196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16196#discussion_r2128523292
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/joins.slt:
##
@@ -4702,7 +4702,8 @@ physical_plan
01)CrossJoinExec
02)--DataSourceExec: partitions=1, partition_sizes=[
kosiew opened a new pull request, #16258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16258
## Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #16228
## Rationale for this change
`Array::is_null` does not correctly identify nulls for `DictionaryArray`
when the indices poi
zhuqi-lucas commented on PR #16196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16196#issuecomment-2943654190
> @zhuqi-lucas regarding corner cases, I've added two additional tests on my
branch for filter and join.
>
> Filter can refuse to cancel if the filter rejects many full bat
osipovartem commented on issue #6543:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/6543#issuecomment-2943653445
Here is the same issue
```sql
CREATE TABLE test (col1 DATE, col2 DATE);
INSERT INTO test
SELECT TO_DATE('2013-05-08T23:39:20.123'),
TO_DATE('2013-05-08T23:39
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #16196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16196#discussion_r2128526165
##
datafusion/common/src/config.rs:
##
@@ -722,6 +722,19 @@ config_namespace! {
/// then the output will be coerced to a non-view.
/// Coerce
alamb opened a new issue, #16259:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16259
Related Items:
- Coordination Google Doc: TBD
- Mailing List Thread: TBD
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
Per https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/committee/d
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #16196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16196#discussion_r2128549342
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/execution_plan.rs:
##
@@ -75,7 +75,19 @@ use futures::stream::{StreamExt, TryStreamExt};
/// [`execute`]: ExecutionPlan::execu
GitHub user alamb added a comment to the discussion: DISCUSSION: May 27, 2025
DataFusion Meetup in Amsterdam
I think this event was postponed, FWIW
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/discussions/16038#discussioncomment-13378346
This is an automatically sent email for gith
GitHub user alamb added a comment to the discussion: Expose intermediary states
in aggregation functions
👋 -- perhaps
https://docs.rs/datafusion/latest/datafusion/logical_expr/trait.Accumulator.html#tymethod.state
is relevant
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/discussions/16
codecov-commenter commented on PR #1851:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1851#issuecomment-2944850645
##
[Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1851?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_ca
pepijnve commented on PR #16196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16196#issuecomment-2945139509
Changing hats to DataFusion user mode where I need to make sure that the end
users of our system can press 'cancel' at any time and that works as expected.
From that perspecti
ozankabak commented on PR #16196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16196#issuecomment-2945161909
I will be traveling tomorrow, but myself and @berkaysynnada will help drive
this to completion early next week. I made some progress on sketching out a
good API and will circle bac
alamb commented on PR #16195:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16195#issuecomment-2945581697
Let's wait to merge this PR until we ship DataFusion 48 to limit the
breaking changes
- #15771
I think we'll be able to merge this in the next few days
--
This is an autom
GitHub user timsaucer added a comment to the discussion: DISCUSSION: DataFusion
Meetup in New York, NY, USA
I am interested in attending and there are a few topics I could present on,
depending on what time we have available.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/discussions/1626
alamb commented on code in PR #16183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16183#discussion_r2129704959
##
.github/workflows/rust.yml:
##
@@ -476,6 +476,28 @@ jobs:
POSTGRES_HOST: postgres
POSTGRES_PORT: ${{ job.services.postgres.ports[5432] }}
alamb commented on PR #16183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16183#issuecomment-2945612836
Thank you for the review @2010YOUY01
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
alamb merged PR #16183:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16183
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on issue #15771:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15771#issuecomment-2945615819
> I would also like to include
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16256
Merged!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
andygrove commented on PR #1830:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1830#issuecomment-2945620138
The Spark version will also need to be updated in
`.github/workflows/spark_sql_test_ansi.yml`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
adriangb commented on PR #16264:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16264#issuecomment-2945616545
Ah I was waiting for the email but in reality I just missed it 😄
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub an
adriangb merged PR #16264:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16264
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
adriangb commented on PR #16264:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16264#issuecomment-2945617720
Worked!! Sweet. Thank you Andrew (for the fix and nudge).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use th
xudong963 commented on issue #15771:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15771#issuecomment-2948015656
> It looks like these changes all went into the `main` branch. I've been
testing off of the `48.0.0-rc1` tag, should I switch to test off of `main`?
I'll update branch46
kosiew opened a new issue, #16266:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16266
#16258 closes #16228
We should [update the fuzz tests to include Dict with null
values](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16258#issuecomment-2944973123).
--
This is an automated messa
kosiew commented on code in PR #16257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16257#discussion_r2131457267
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/limit.slt:
##
@@ -860,6 +860,7 @@ query I
with selection as (
select *
from test_limit_with_partitions
+order b
xudong963 commented on issue #15771:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15771#issuecomment-2948082010
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16267 After it's merged, I'll push
the 48.0.0-rc2 and start vote
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
T
xudong963 opened a new pull request, #16267:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16267
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes teste
iffyio commented on code in PR #1865:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1865#discussion_r2131627748
##
tests/sqlparser_common.rs:
##
@@ -9132,7 +9132,9 @@ fn test_create_index_with_with_clause() {
#[test]
fn parse_drop_index() {
let sql = "DROP
andygrove opened a new issue, #1852:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1852
### What is the problem the feature request solves?
The following tests in WholeStageCodegenSuite currently pass because we are
falling back to Spark, but they fail when they run natively
pepijnve opened a new pull request, #16262:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16262
## Which issue does this PR close?
- No issue created yet, related to PR #16196.
## Rationale for this change
The current benchmark comparison script compares
andygrove commented on PR #1847:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1847#issuecomment-2944297917
I reported the bug in DataFusion yesterday and there is already a fix
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16256
Perhaps this will be included in the 48.0.0 release
ozankabak commented on PR #16196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16196#issuecomment-2944338401
Great, let's add tests for all cases we currently fail to cover (interleave,
join, filter). We will then use them as litmus tests as we iterate on the API
and the rule.
🚀
andygrove merged PR #16256:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16256
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@data
alamb commented on issue #6543:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/6543#issuecomment-2944658229
> would it be correct to use statement visitors here to add unique aliases?
I think that is actually a pretty neat idea -- specifically add the aliases
in the SQL planner
alamb commented on PR #14775:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14775#issuecomment-2945964478
gogogo
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubsc
alamb merged PR #14775:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14775
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #16261:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16261#issuecomment-2945974005
I rebased this PR on main so it was ready to go
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above t
alamb commented on PR #16261:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16261#issuecomment-2945974874
If the tests pass I'll merge it in
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the s
GitHub user leoDYL added a comment to the discussion: DISCUSSION: DataFusion
Meetup in New York, NY, USA
We're looking for a variety of topics with the theme of reflecting on the 50
releases of DataFusion! Seems [VegaFusion](https://vegafusion.io/) has been
using DataFusion for a while so it
clflushopt commented on issue #14608:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/14608#issuecomment-2948048431
Hey @alamb following suggestions from @kevinjqliu I am happy to say that
https://github.com/clflushopt/datafusion-tpch provides a ux on par with duckdb
and what we discussed
pepijnve commented on code in PR #16262:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16262#discussion_r2131585926
##
benchmarks/bench.sh:
##
@@ -66,10 +67,11 @@ DATAFUSION_DIR=/source/datafusion ./bench.sh run tpch
**
* Commands
**
-data: Generates
pepijnve commented on code in PR #16262:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16262#discussion_r2131600952
##
benchmarks/compare.py:
##
@@ -148,10 +174,23 @@ def compare(
)
continue
-total_baseline_time += baseline_result.execution_t
kosiew commented on code in PR #16258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16258#discussion_r2131413138
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/aggregate.slt:
##
@@ -5030,6 +5030,20 @@ select count(distinct column1), count(distinct column2)
from dict_test group by
sta
xudong963 merged PR #16267:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16267
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@data
pepijnve commented on PR #16196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16196#issuecomment-2948268910
@zhuqi-lucas @alamb I wanted to work on measuring the performance impact of
this PR today, but looking at
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16262#pullrequestreview-290313953
parthchandra commented on issue #1849:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1849#issuecomment-2947748623
I wonder how likely is it that a comet user would be on an architecture that
does not support unaligned memory access.
--
This is an automated message from the Apac
ding-young opened a new pull request, #16268:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16268
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #16130 .
## TODO
- [ ] add test for compression in spill file
- [ ] refine arg names
- [ ] check config docs
alamb commented on PR #16251:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16251#issuecomment-2944591691
> I am confused why CI will not fail for this case, i remember some cases i
run locally to -- --complete, but the CI failed, so i add RUST_BACKTRACE to
generate.
I think sqllogi
andygrove opened a new pull request, #1851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1851
## Which issue does this PR close?
N/A
## Rationale for this change
Improve testing and help prevent regressions
## What changes are included in th
andygrove commented on code in PR #1851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1851#discussion_r2128955528
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometArrayExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -399,12 +399,7 @@ class CometArrayExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
alamb commented on PR #16195:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16195#issuecomment-2944619110
> > Should it target main or the 47 branch ?
>
> The `main` branch is the good one (I don't think the branch-47 is the most
recent release branch anyway)
yeah, let's targe
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #16196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16196#discussion_r2128830214
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/execution_plan.rs:
##
@@ -546,6 +558,23 @@ pub trait ExecutionPlan: Debug + DisplayAs + Send + Sync {
child_pushdo
andygrove commented on issue #15771:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15771#issuecomment-2944294392
I would also like to include https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16256
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please lo
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #16196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16196#discussion_r2128845907
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/execution_plan.rs:
##
@@ -75,7 +75,19 @@ use futures::stream::{StreamExt, TryStreamExt};
/// [`execute`]: ExecutionPlan::execu
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #16196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16196#discussion_r2128846243
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/group_by.slt:
##
@@ -4113,7 +4113,7 @@ EXPLAIN SELECT lhs.c, rhs.c, lhs.sum1, rhs.sum1
logical_plan
01)Projection
andygrove commented on code in PR #16256:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16256#discussion_r2128850266
##
datafusion/physical-plan/src/aggregates/group_values/multi_group_by/primitive.rs:
##
@@ -121,7 +122,7 @@ impl
GroupColumn
// Otherwise, we n
zhuqi-lucas commented on PR #16251:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16251#issuecomment-2944937313
Thank you @alamb , is it possible for --complete also generate substring
which matches in CI?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the me
andygrove commented on issue #1739:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1739#issuecomment-2945837570
Fixed in https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1831 and
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1838
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
andygrove closed issue #1739: Enable more DPP Spark SQL tests
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1739
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To uns
alamb commented on code in PR #16258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16258#discussion_r2130020509
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/count.rs:
##
@@ -711,8 +711,8 @@ impl Accumulator for DistinctCountAccumulator {
}
(0..arr.len()).try_for_e
jonathanc-n commented on PR #16210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16210#issuecomment-2945916745
There's an interesting implementation of index joins
[here](https://github.com/duckdb/duckdb/pull/1008), but this would involve
creating indexes. What are the thoughts on support
alamb commented on PR #16264:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16264#issuecomment-2945947663
WOOHOO 🚀
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsu
HuyNguyen7994 commented on issue #1475:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1475#issuecomment-2944295472
@cisaacson I'm having the same problem. Turn out you want to visit
`SelectItem`:
https://github.com/HuyNguyen7994/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/tree/add-select-item-
andygrove commented on code in PR #1851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1851#discussion_r2129233751
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1394,10 +1394,10 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
Adapti
adriangb commented on code in PR #16014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16014#discussion_r2129798435
##
datafusion/proto/src/physical_plan/to_proto.rs:
##
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ pub fn serialize_file_scan_config(
.iter()
.cloned()
.collect
adriangb commented on PR #16014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16014#issuecomment-2945656786
I've rebased this and it's looking nice now.
I think the main open question is the concern about performance / overhead:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16014/file
GitHub user jonmmease added a comment to the discussion: DISCUSSION: DataFusion
Meetup in New York, NY, USA
What kinds of talks are you looking for? I may be available to give one on how
[VegaFusion](https://vegafusion.io/) uses DataFusion.
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/d
GitHub user lwwmanning added a comment to the discussion: DISCUSSION:
DataFusion Meetup in New York, NY, USA
I’d love to give a talk on DataFusion/Vortex stuff! Specifically, how
DataFusion’s extensibility was hugely useful for bootstrapping,
building/testing, & benchmarking a new file format
2010YOUY01 commented on code in PR #16262:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16262#discussion_r2131020155
##
benchmarks/bench.sh:
##
@@ -66,10 +67,11 @@ DATAFUSION_DIR=/source/datafusion ./bench.sh run tpch
**
* Commands
**
-data: Generate
shehabgamin commented on issue #15771:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/15771#issuecomment-2947035398
> I think we have merged all the desired PRs now:
>
> * [fix: NaN semantics in GROUP BY
#16256](https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16256)
>
> * [
Copilot commented on code in PR #16262:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16262#discussion_r2131026859
##
benchmarks/compare.py:
##
@@ -148,10 +174,23 @@ def compare(
)
continue
-total_baseline_time += baseline_result.execution_ti
parthchandra commented on issue #1843:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1843#issuecomment-2947362362
Why would the expected result be `[null], [null], [null]` ? This means that
all the structs are null but that is not the actual data. Only in the third
row, is the str
zhuqi-lucas commented on code in PR #16196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16196#discussion_r2128845315
##
datafusion/common/src/config.rs:
##
@@ -722,6 +722,19 @@ config_namespace! {
/// then the output will be coerced to a non-view.
/// Coerce
andygrove closed issue #16254: Inconsistency with count distinct on NaN values
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16254
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comm
pepijnve commented on PR #16196:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16196#issuecomment-2944505070
> I feel like we are getting close to a point where we start having
not-so-fruitful discussions. I think I have made a good effort to make my
arguments and reasoning clear.
@
blaginin merged PR #15871:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15871
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@dataf
blaginin closed issue #258: Improve performance of COUNT (distinct x) for
dictionary columns
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/258
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #16143:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16143#issuecomment-2945761029
Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong.
We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by
commenting `@dependabot rebase`
timsaucer opened a new pull request, #14775:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14775
## Which issue does this PR close?
This PR addresses part of #14562
## Rationale for this change
This change allows for using user defined **aggregate** functions across FFI
alamb closed pull request #14775: feat: Add Aggregate UDF to FFI crate
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14775
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To u
alamb commented on PR #14775:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14775#issuecomment-2945762124
It seems github is experiencing issues. I will close/reopen this PR to
restart the checks
https://www.githubstatus.com/
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2bc627ef
jonathanc-n commented on code in PR #16258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16258#discussion_r2130695219
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/aggregate.slt:
##
@@ -5030,6 +5030,20 @@ select count(distinct column1), count(distinct column2)
from dict_test group by
jonathanc-n commented on code in PR #16258:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16258#discussion_r2130695219
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/aggregate.slt:
##
@@ -5030,6 +5030,20 @@ select count(distinct column1), count(distinct column2)
from dict_test group by
huaxingao commented on issue #1833:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1833#issuecomment-2946713655
To work around the shading issues, I'm working on higher-level abstractions
so that we don't need to pass any Parquet objects.
--
This is an automated message from the
mara-schulke commented on issue #581:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/581#issuecomment-2944785439
Hi @andygrove, we are currently using `PyDataFrame` and would like to use it
to convert back to a `datafusion::DataFrame` do you have any information /
guidance on how
andygrove commented on issue #581:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-python/issues/581#issuecomment-2944796949
Perhaps @timsaucer can provide some guidance
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
U
comphead commented on code in PR #1851:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1851#discussion_r2129022559
##
spark/src/test/scala/org/apache/comet/CometExpressionSuite.scala:
##
@@ -1394,10 +1394,10 @@ class CometExpressionSuite extends CometTestBase with
Adaptiv
Dandandan commented on PR #15591:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15591#issuecomment-2945391975
thanks @Rachelint and congratulations!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
andygrove commented on PR #1736:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1736#issuecomment-2945396822
Current failures:
core1:
```
2025-06-05T16:40:13.0938574Z [info] - avoid reordering broadcast join keys
to match input hash partitioning *** FAILED *** (2 seco
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
