Hi Luca,
On 1/9/06, Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that's an useflag you may use it or not, webapps use webapp-config that
> already handles /srv w/out any problem, having the base webroot using
> srvdir would be nice so you spare a couple of mv but that's all...
>
> lu
I haven't read
media-gfx/graphicsmagick:gs - enable ghostscript support
media-gfx/imagemagick:gs - enable ghostscript support
media-libs/urt:gs - Add support for postscript
Looking in these ebuilds, all:
gs? ( virtual/ghostscript )
Please make global.
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://c
Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
[...]
>>
>> An eselect-mysql module has been prepared to create simlinks for the
>> desired version of mysql making easy to switch between them (hopefully)
>>
>> The libraries (libmysqlclient & co) don't follow this logic and the
>> higher version is always the default (simi
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Which packages do you want to add the srvdir global USE flag for?
fenice has support for it in at configure level, gentoo-webroot-default
could enjoy it as well as apache may provide an alternate default too.
lu
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Francesco Riosa wrote:
> Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
> [...]
>
>>>An eselect-mysql module has been prepared to create simlinks for the
>>>desired version of mysql making easy to switch between them (hopefully)
>>>
>>>The libraries (libmysqlclient & co) don't follow this logic and the
>>>higher version
On Monday 09 January 2006 03:14, Marius Mauch wrote:
> Find a nice place in www.gentoo.org/proj/
Okay that's what I try to do most of the time, in this specific case, I'm
probably going to ask for space to qa project (as fixing --as-needed problems
or parallel make issues and such is imho QA-rela
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
In portage there is only one keyserver named Onak. It is quite unusable
for me, so I've looked for other keyservers. I've found three quite
common on the internet:
CKS - http://www.cryptnet.net/fsp/cks/
SKS - http://www.nongnu.org/sks/
PKS - h
Hi
It's been brought to my attention that dnsmasq and acpid use start-stop-daemon
to send custom signals such as HUP. While this works with baselayout-1.11, it
does not work with baselayout-1.12
The start-stop-daemon-binary has to have either a --start or --stop option.
Now I read this as two
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:32:32PM +, Roy Marples wrote:
> So, the question now must be, do we allow start-stop-daemon to defy calling
> logic and NOT stop a daemon? How do we know we're not supposed to stop the
> daemon based on a custom signal? The answer is we can't. So instead of
>
> sta
On Monday 09 January 2006 12:40, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:32:32PM +, Roy Marples wrote:
> > So, the question now must be, do we allow start-stop-daemon to defy
> > calling logic and NOT stop a daemon? How do we know we're not supposed to
> > stop the daemon based
Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
> Francesco Riosa wrote:
>> Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
[...]
>
> Now this is in my mind, a mind that looks for bugs and troubles before
they come out.
That's exactly what I'm looking for ;-)
>
> If mysql is slotted (and you said it it will be soon), what will
happen to softwa
On Monday 09 January 2006 07:32, Roy Marples wrote:
> It's been brought to my attention that dnsmasq and acpid use
> start-stop-daemon to send custom signals such as HUP. While this works with
> baselayout-1.11, it does not work with baselayout-1.12
is this due to changes we are making in Gentoo ?
Brian Harring wrote:[Sun Jan 08 2006, 09:16:36PM EST]
> Regardless, (imo) it's already been laid out why guideXML'ifying
> everything doesn't totally work. Three reasons...
>
> A) bit of work required just to jot down a quick list of "this is
> broke, fix it" that's going to be thrown out 2
Regarding the inclusion of ca-certificates as a PDEPEND (yeah a brief
exchange of emails already happened on -dev but since it's not so easy to
track it I'm lagging behind on this) I would like to express that I really
don't like the fact that we are "trusting" cacert.org certs (among others)
with
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:55 +0100, Andrea Barisani wrote:
> Regarding the inclusion of ca-certificates as a PDEPEND (yeah a brief
> exchange of emails already happened on -dev but since it's not so easy to
> track it I'm lagging behind on this) I would like to express that I really
> don't like the
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:55 +0100, Andrea Barisani wrote:
> > Regarding the inclusion of ca-certificates as a PDEPEND (yeah a brief
> > exchange of emails already happened on -dev but since it's not so easy to
> > track it I'm lagging behind
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:12:31PM +0100, Andrea Barisani wrote:
> USE=cacerts sounds the proper course of action to me.
If this is implemented, please make it USE=cacert, not USE=cacerts.
./Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd
pgpdOk
9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
>>
>> Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be tied to a USE= flag?
>> If so should it be a 'no*certs' flag or a USE=cacerts ?
> USE=cacerts sounds the proper course of action to me.
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:22:59AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> is this due to changes we are making in Gentoo ? i.e. we've just been
> importing ssd from Debian for the most part and i dont really think we should
> be diverging in behavior ...
Both dnsmasq and acpid have been fixed to use `k
Andrea Barisani wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:55 +0100, Andrea Barisani wrote:
>>
>>>Regarding the inclusion of ca-certificates as a PDEPEND (yeah a brief
>>>exchange of emails already happened on -dev but since it's not so easy to
>>>
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:21:42PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
>
> 9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be tied to a USE= flag?
> >> If so should it be a 'no*certs' flag or
On Monday 09 January 2006 14:22, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 09 January 2006 07:32, Roy Marples wrote:
> > It's been brought to my attention that dnsmasq and acpid use
> > start-stop-daemon to send custom signals such as HUP. While this works
> > with baselayout-1.11, it does not work with ba
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:34:22 -0500
Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote: [Sun Jan 08 2006, 09:16:36PM EST]
> > Regardless, (imo) it's already been laid out why guideXML'ifying
> > everything doesn't totally work. Three reasons...
> >
> > A) bit of work required just to
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:28:04PM +0100, Andrea Barisani wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:21:42PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
> >
> > 9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
> >
> > >>
> > >> Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-
Jakub Moc wrote:
9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be tied to a USE= flag?
If so should it be a 'no*certs' flag or a USE=cacerts ?
USE=cacerts sounds the proper course of act
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:32:28PM +, Roy Marples wrote:
> hostapd
I've just updated hostapd ~ARCH to use kill.
Regards,
Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd
pgpysdQP3Z21L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
9.1.2006, 17:28:04, Andrea Barisani wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:21:42PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
>>
>> 9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
>>
>> >>
>> >> Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be tied to a U
9.1.2006, 17:56:30, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Jakub Moc wrote:
>> 9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
> Just add it as DEPEND and everybody would be fine, isn't it?
Not a realplayer issue (see the other mail).
--
jakub
pg
Francesco Riosa wrote:
>> Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
>>
[...]
>> "{{{ A hypothetical example:
>>
>> I used mysql-4.1.16-r30 and I have a locally encoded (say Shift_JIS)
>> database. I have DBD-mysql compiled against that and a package FOO using
>> that works as expected.
>>
>> Some package wants >=
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 06:03:03PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
>
> 9.1.2006, 17:28:04, Andrea Barisani wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:21:42PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
> >>
> >> 9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
> >>
On Sunday 08 January 2006 18:59, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> Okay let's forget the flames and talk about something related to
> practical development today :)
Sigh ok no practical development at this come out as a discussion/flame again.
What I was thinking of is _not_:
- a wiki writable
Sending this to the ml, tom already has heard the reasons but throwing
them out for others to comment on...
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:47:57PM +, Tom Martin wrote:
> > I realize this doesn't address the *rest* of what you said, though...
> These little 'howtos' are potentially very short,
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:47:57 +
Tom Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:34:22 -0500
> Aron Griffis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Brian Harring wrote:[Sun Jan 08 2006, 09:16:36PM EST]
> > > Regardless, (imo) it's already been laid out why guideXML'ifying
> > > e
On Monday 09 January 2006 18:11, Andrea Barisani wrote:
> Yeah it could be treated as a bug, I'd rather fix that by patching wget
> (--dont-be-a-pain-with-self-signed-certs yes) or anyway at *that* layer and
> not by adding ca-certificates as a DEPEND since it has other implications
> that we alrea
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: [Sun Jan 08 2006, 11:59:40AM CST]
> I originally thought of putting it on my devspace, but using GuideXML
> there is a bit tricky, at least for me (as xsltproc seems to refuse
> working on the pure xml directly).
I actually prefer devspace for these sorts of docs.
Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Again, I like devspace for these things. Of course, particularly useful
> docs would likely be adopted by the GDP (with the permission of the
> author, of course).
Thinking about legal issues (and about tracking all contributors among
developers) - please use CC-BY-SA [1]
Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: [Sun Jan 08 2006, 11:59:40AM CST]
>
>>I originally thought of putting it on my devspace, but using GuideXML
>>there is a bit tricky, at least for me (as xsltproc seems to refuse
>>working on the pure xml directly).
>
>
> I actually prefer
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:11:42 +0100
"Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And IIRC ciaranm said it took quite a while to render the devmanual
> from RST to HTML, would be difficult to sync hourly then.
The devmanual has an an enormous number of links, citations and cross
referenc
On Monday 09 January 2006 21:04, Tom Martin wrote:
> The devmanual has an an enormous number of links, citations and cross
> references. I'd imagine that's what really takes time to generate. For
> things like this, it would be very fast.
Might be good to test moinmoin's RST support then.
--
Dieg
On Monday 09 January 2006 11:56, Brian Harring wrote:
>Curl won't honor/use the cacerts package for example
it does actually, re-emerge it after ca-certificates
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> media-gfx/graphicsmagick:gs - enable ghostscript support
> media-gfx/imagemagick:gs - enable ghostscript support
> media-libs/urt:gs - Add support for postscript
>
> Looking in these ebuilds, all:
> gs? ( virtual/ghostscript )
For how many of these might
Subject line:
A New Linux Way
Text as follows:
Hello fellow Linux Users!
We here at SaviourLinux.com desire to create a united universal way.
Please visit the website for more information, but here is the purpose:
Saviour Linux is an easy and universal Linux distribution that pays
community
On 1/9/06, Mark Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject line:
> A New Linux Way
Learn to send emails correctly?
>
> Text as follows:
>
> Hello fellow Linux Users!
>
> We here at SaviourLinux.com desire to create a united universal way.
> Please visit the website for more information, but h
Dan Meltzer wrote:
Please don't spam other distrobutions mailing lists with your trash. Thank you!
Personally, I would rather donate money to the one I am using and like
than to $BUY$ and have to learn another distro. I also went to the site
and can't even figure out how to get the
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:45:01PM +, Luis Medinas wrote:
> We could start a public wiki displaying all herds and projects. It would
> be great to add some low level docs, herds/project goals, ideas and so.
> Even the users could be allowed to edit and share information.
I would personally wel
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 06:45:01PM +, Luis Medinas wrote:
>
>>We could start a public wiki displaying all herds and projects. It would
>>be great to add some low level docs, herds/project goals, ideas and so.
>>Even the users could be allowed to edit and share informati
On Monday 09 January 2006 22:40, Mark Stewart wrote:
> Please contact me if you are interested.
thank you captain douche
please unsubscribe yourself from our lists and never stop by again
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
| We have already received many bugs for documentation in /proj/* which is
| not GDPs. I had no issue with this as I hoped this would be a transient
| state where the documentation is eventually handed over to the GDP so that
| b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lance Albertson wrote:
| What if instead of having proj/en we did herd/en on www? Of course, that
| doesn't help the whole "GuideXML is hard" bit. I like the idea of using
| RST, but it doesn't seem very scalable at this time. Maybe, instead of
| that
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Lance Albertson wrote:
> | What if instead of having proj/en we did herd/en on www? Of course, that
> | doesn't help the whole "GuideXML is hard" bit. I like the idea of using
> | RST, but it doesn't seem very scalable at this time. Maybe, instead of
> | that, we created so
50 matches
Mail list logo
