9.1.2006, 17:12:31, Andrea Barisani wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:08:38AM -0500, solar wrote:
>> >> Do you think the PDEPEND of the ca-certs should be tied to a USE= flag? >> If so should it be a 'no*certs' flag or a USE=cacerts ? > USE=cacerts sounds the proper course of action to me. NOT until use-based deps are in place, plzktnxbye!!! Don't break the damned realplayer thing again. -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
pgpsEZgc6Hws7.pgp
Description: PGP signature