Re: [VOTE] Policy on Initial Committership

On 10/1/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Taken from the "Problem with commit rights on Celtixfire" thread: - The Incubator PMC sets the Mentors, who form the initial PPMC - The PPMC (Mentors) elects additional PPMC members - The PPMC elects Committers This also implies changing

Re: "svn: Inconsistent line ending style" when trying to update site-publish?

On 10/12/06, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I did, but the ibatis.html file at least, appears to have that property set, as does my SVN client! Generated files cause this, same issue occurs with the Apache site: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-881 Theres a solution on the

Re: REVISED Policy on Initial Committer and PPMC members

+1 (non-binding) Niall On 10/12/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Based upon all of the discussion, I'll pose the following as what I hope is an agreeable solution: -- The Champion shall work with the incoming community to identify the initial committers. The

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivy

It seems unclear to me whether this proposal is for a TLP or sub-project of ant? I'm also not sure whether that even matters or something thats usually considered at the Incubator proposal stage? Niall On 10/23/06, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi All, After several weeks of discuss

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Harmony to TLP status (pending board approval)

+1 (non-binding) Niall On 10/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Apache Harmony community has voted to request graduation from the Incubator as a TLP. The follow

Re: [Vote] Incubating Project Policy

+1 to Bill's suggestion of having an "ASF Commit Policy" - but there are many points in this thread that would be good to be incorporated in his original suggestion. Niall On 2/3/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2/2/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If they aren

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Lucene.Net 2.0 build 003 incubating

On 3/5/07, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Dan, Many thanks for looking this over. For #1 & #3. Can you tell how to go about fixing them? How/where do I create/get those files? The ASF Source Header and Copyright Notice Policy is here: http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Day contribution of Jackrabbit bundle persistence

On 3/9/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Where can we find the cclas.txt? Is it in the Apache SVN? Details and link to CCLA here: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas Niall Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: "robert burrell donkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Se

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Day contribution of Jackrabbit bundle persistence

On 3/10/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/9/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Where can we find the cclas.txt? Is it in the Apache SVN? it's in a private repository (i don't the precise reasons why this information needs to be restricted) What about

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Day contribution of Jackrabbit bundle persistence

On 3/10/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/10/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/10/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/9/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > >

Re: [VOTE] approve release of CXF 2.0-incubator-RC

On 4/27/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a new release of CXF. The thread is at: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cxf-dev/200704.mbox/<200704241450.11157.dkulp%40apache.org> In summary, we have 11 +1 votes, 1 0 vote, no

Re: [docs] Please review first draft of graduation guide

On 5/9/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html now has a reasonable quantity of content. the organisation could probably be improved, some necessary content has probably been missed and more proof reading would be good. so, this is a

Re: [docs] Please review first draft of graduation guide

On 5/12/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/10/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/9/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html now has a > > reasonable quan

Re: [Vote] Ratify the release of Apache Tuscany SDO 1.0-incubating-beta1

Ant refers to the need to "clarify the use of the OSOA licensed code" in the following message: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17270.html: Not sure whats meant exactly by clarify - but sounds to me like something that should be done before a release? One minor nitpick with th

Re: [Vote] Ratify the release of Apache Tuscany SDO 1.0-incubating-beta1

mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] [3] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17270.html [4] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17442.html On 14/05/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ant refers to the need to "clarify the use of the OSOA licensed c

Re: Sending proposal to board: how to?

On 5/27/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The graduation guide is a bit vague and incomplete on one point: sending the resolution to the board. It is mentioned in the process description to send a message to the board (to board@), but there are of course no example messages to be f

Re: [doc] Proposal guide - please review

Looks good to me - I agree with Martijn's comment on removing the "Template" sub-heading Niall On 7/15/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html is marked as DRAFT. it has quite a lot of content so hopefully we should be able to tidy i

Re: [DRAFT] August 2015 Board Report - Please Review

Geode was supposed to report - but its not included in the missing reports list. Niall On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 1:30 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > I'd like to present the draft board report for additional community input. > We have reports expected from 19 podlings, 12 reported, 7 did no

Re: Reform of Incubator

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 04.08.2015 18:12, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > What about the Ignite thread was "unfortunate"? That it was a bit > > heated at times, or just the fact that there was disagreement? I fear > > that there's too much bias towards +1'ing things ev

Re: [DRAFT] August 2015 Board Report - Please Review

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:31 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM Niall Pemberton > > wrote: > > > Geode was supposed to report - but its not included in the missing > reports > > list. > > > > Hmm very good point. podlings.xml i

Re: [DRAFT] August 2015 Board Report - Please Review

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:47 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:43 PM Marvin Humphrey > wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, John D. Ament > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:10 PM Niall Pemberton < > >

Re: [DRAFT] August 2015 Board Report - Please Review

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:21 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:13 PM Niall Pemberton > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:47 AM, John D. Ament > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:43 PM Marvin Humphrey

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Amol Kekre wrote: > oh! We preferred that during our discussion. Somehow we thought there was a > limit. I have changed it to full names (APEX-CORE, APEX-MALHAR). If there > is a limit we can reduce the number of chars later. wiki is updated. > > https://wiki.apac

Re: [DISCUSS] Apex Incubation Proposal

hat '_' can be removed if that is the policy. > Wiki updated. > I asked on the infra list what the JIRA key format was and whether it could be changed to include underscore and got the following response: "They are all uppercase alpha characters. Sadly it cannot be changed.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apex into the Apache Incubator

+1 Niall On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:48 PM, P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Following the discussion thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE for > Accepting Apex as a new Apache Incubator project. > > The proposal is available on the wiki [2] and is also attached below. > > The VOTE will be open for at

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentor neutrality policy

I'm -1 on this. We have people working for companies who have a vested interest probably on most PMC's at Apache and why should we have a different set of rules for the Incubator PMC than any other PMC? If there is a specific concerns that an individual is acting against the ASF's best interest, t

Re: Mentor disengagement - a suggestion

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:17 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi Justin, > > Just to clarify. > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:54 AM Justin Erenkrantz > wrote: > > > I will just note that I disagree with adding bureaucracy like this. > > We already require podlings to submit reports as frequently as > >

Re: Concerning Sentry: A disagreement over the Apache Way and graduation

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Lenni Kuff wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > PMC membership has nothing to do with technical mastery of the codebase, > > which > > is why I cringe every time I see people talking about what "the bar" > should > > be. > > It's abo

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenMiracl for Incubation

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 01:33 +, Nick Kew wrote: > > I should like to propose that we consider OpenMiracl for incubation. > > This proposal is now at > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenMiraclProposal "As soon as OpenMiracl is accepted i

Re: RTC vs CTR (was: Concerning Sentry...)

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > > > > > Nobody is forcing anything. > > > > > > Personally, I am saying RTC is destructive, and am willing to give > every > > > po

Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Alex, > > Please re-read my email. As I stated we don’t take code that > authors don’t want us to have. Surely it depends on how that work was licensed before the ASF? http://www.apache.org/l

Re: Adopting non-ASF AL projects (was Re: [DISCUSS] Kudu incubator proposal)

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Harbs wrote: > Both Swiz and AS3Commons were originally hosted on Google Code and Apache > License was clearly stated there[1][2]. So I don’t think there’s any > question about the license. Like you said, it’s not likely anyone that > contributed even if they don’

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, > > It seems that podling websites are available at both these URL patterns: > > http://podling.incubator.apache.org > http://podling.apache.org > > See for example: > > http://systemml.apache.org/ > http://systemml.incubato

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Sergio Fernández > wrote: > > Well, the transition is not that hard if: > > > > a) during incubation podling.a.o redirects (302/307) to podling.i.a.o > > > > b) after graduation podling.i.a.o redirects (301)

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: > > > As Rob said, if they're following the other branding requirements, then > do > > we need to continue enforcing the subdomain requirement? > &

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: > > > Attached a patch to: > > 1. change from poding.i.a.o to poding.a.o > > 2. Require the incubator logo and that it be prominent > > Tha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Myriad 0.1.0 (incubating)

Hi Santosh, Initially looked good, I checked the license, notice & disclaimer files. I ran the build and no issues. Then I tried to run RAT which I cancelled after running for quite a time. When I excluded "myriad-scheduler\src\main\resources\webapp\node_modules" it finished quickly and was good.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Myriad 0.1.0 (incubating)

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > Hi Santosh, > > Initially looked good, I checked the license, notice & disclaimer files. I > ran the build and no issues. > > Then I tried to run RAT which I cancelled after running for quite a time. > When I exclu

Re: Websites at podling.apache.org

On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: > > >> > Attached a patch to: > >> > 1. change from poding.i.a.o to poding.a.o > >> > 2. Require the incubator logo and that it be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Myriad 0.1.0 (incubating)

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Also it looks like you may of run rat after building the software not > before. Those file don’t exist in the source tar ball and only exist after > building the software. > Doh, yes. I did a clean before I ran RAT, but the build pol

Re: [VOTE] Accept Milagro into the Incubator

+1 Niall On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > I should like to call a vote to accept Milagro into > the Incubator. The full proposal is available at > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MilagroProposal > as well as below. > > Note that the project was first discussed here under >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > My bad, I forgot to include unomi--src.[tar.gz|zip] artifact as I do > for other project. > > Anyway, the source are on git based on the tag: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-unomi/tree/unomi-root-1.0.0-incubating > > (I pa

PodlingIP Clearance for Additional Code Donations

The process for accept a podling and the initial code base is pretty clear, since it undergoes an IPMC vote. But what happens when there are additional chunks of code donated during incubation? Is that OK under the original IPMC vote and the grant just needs recording with the secretary or should

Re: PodlingIP Clearance for Additional Code Donations

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: > > The process for accept a podling and the initial code base is pretty > clear, > > since it undergoes an IPMC vote. > > > > But what happens

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geode (incubating) 1.0.0-incubating.M1

I already reviewed the release and voted +1 on dev@geode, but just wanted to ensure that my vote was also counted here. +1 (binding) Niall On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Anthony Baker wrote: > Hello, > > This is a call for a vote on the Apache Geode (incubating) release > 1.0.0-incubating.M1.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

Johnzon reports for June, Sept & Dec 2015 all listed "adding new committers/pmc members" in the "most important issues to address in the move towards graduation" - but in that time there were no changes to the community. So what changed to make the ppmc/mentors now think the project is ready to gra

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

> LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > > On Sunday, 3 April 2016, 20:18, Niall Pemberton < > niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Johnzon reports for June, Sept & Dec 2015 all listed "adding new > > committers/pmc members" in the &quo

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

term. Niall > > John > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 5:58 PM Niall Pemberton > wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Mark Struberg > > > wrote: > > > > > Please look at more current data > > > > > > https://github.co

Re: [DISCUSS] Juneau Incubation Proposal

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:52 PM, James Bognar wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to propose Juneau to be an Apache Incubator project. > > Juneau is a toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide variety of content > types using a common framework, and for creating sophisticated > self-documenting REST inte

Re: [VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator

+1 Niall On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:10 PM, James Bognar wrote: > Hi all, > > It looks like the discussion thread has died down so I am now calling a > vote on accepting Juneau into the Apache Incubator. > > For those who are interested the DISCUSS thread can be found at > > https://lists.apache.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator

eau into the Apache Incubator > > Jochen Wiedmann (binding) > > Craig Russell (binding) > > Niall Pemberton > > Bertrand Delacretaz > > Josh Elser (binding) > > Stian Soiland-Reyes > > John D. Ament > > > > [0] +/-0 Not overly bothered

Re: [VOTE] $podling.apache.org is the same as $podling.incubator.apache.org

+1 Niall On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:28 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > Its been discussed a few times, and I'd like to provide clear feedback to > the infra team on how to implement going forward. > > Typically, the addresses $podling.apache.org and $ > podling.incubator.apache.org work, and

Re: Notes on branding

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:47 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:19 PM Greg Chase wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Marvin Humphrey > > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Greg Chase wrote: > > > > > > > The branding guidelines do not address feedback

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

the initial members of the > Apache Geode Project: > > * Anilkumar Gingade > * Anthony Baker > * Ashvin Agrawal > * Avinash Dongre > * Barry Oglesby < bogle...@apache.org> > * Bruce Schuchardt > * Dan Smith > * Darrel Schneider > * Dave Barnes > * E

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

> > > related to a data management platform that provides > real-time, > > > > > > > > consistent access to data-intensive applications > throughout > > > > > > > > widely distributed cloud architectures. > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno > wrote: > > > >> > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me. > >> > > >>

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > >>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

I'm +1 to this for OpenWhisk. I'm -1 to this as a general availability. There could be issues down the road which means that this option is withdrawn. I'd hate to have alot of podlings with an expectation that were later disappointed. Niall On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:26 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > One way of seeing if the project is ready to graduate would be to check if > the PPMC are managing the brand correctly. > > A cursory look shows that IMO it could be a little bit better. For > instance [1] mentions Apache once but h

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > This is a page about Gemfire, not Geode. > > Sure but it’s based on / use Apache Geode right? > This is about ASF trademarks. Just because a company creates a product based on an ASF project doesn't mean they have to mention it at

Re: [VOTE] Accept Geode into the Apache Incubator

+1 Niall (binding) On Monday, April 20, 2015, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Following the discussion earlier in the thread: >http://s.apache.org/Oxt > > I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode > as a new incubator project. > > The proposal is available at: > https://wiki.apache.org/

Re: [DISCUSS] Communicating intent around non-release, downstream integration binary artifacts

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:06 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > let me start by saying that I feel proud about the > rigor with which ASF approaches management > of the ultimate foundation deliverables: the source > releases put out by our communities. If you read our > policy document: >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIE Proposal

Wow, 137 GitHub repositories! OK, so 38 are archived and 19 are forks, but that still leaves 80! Do you have a rough idea of how many of those would be part of the incubation? Historically, Apache has been against "Umbrella Projects" - encouraging them to break up and become individual Top Level

Re: [DISCUSS] KIE Proposal

On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 16:27, Jason Porter wrote: > > > On Dec 6, 2022, at 01:43, Christofer Dutz > wrote: > > > > Hi Jason, > > > > Well, those numbers are a bit better than the initial ones. > > Thing is: Mentors will not only have to help onboard people to Apache > and teach them how to do thi

Re: Old Incubating Batchee Website & Google Analytics

On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 00:39, sebb wrote: > On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 00:10, Niall Pemberton > wrote: > > > > Hi Incubator Team! > > > > Batchee graduated from the Incubator in 2019 to become a sub-project of > > Geronimo and batchee.apache.org now redire

Old Incubating Batchee Website & Google Analytics

Hi Incubator Team! Batchee graduated from the Incubator in 2019 to become a sub-project of Geronimo and batchee.apache.org now redirects to geronimo.apache.org/batchee : - https://batchee.apache.org/ The old incubating batchee website still exists at the following location: - https://svn-

Re: Old Incubating Batchee Website & Google Analytics

On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 01:25, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > On Feb 4, 2025, at 5:02 PM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 00:39, sebb wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 00:10, Niall Pemberton > > >> wrote: > >&g

Re: [DISCUSS] running a trial where podlings need to have their names reviewed before they join

On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 14:53, PJ Fanning wrote: > Seems best to allow the discussion thread to proceed and if things seem > ok, then start the name approval step. The vote only happens after the name > is approved by Brand Management. Does it have to be strict in where it takes place in the proc

Re: Quiz foir mentors

On Sat, 19 Jul 2025 at 12:16, Andrew Wetmore wrote: > We have to create an account to play with the quiz? > Thats the downside of this service - you've got to give them your details to see the courses/quizzes. https://www.instructure.com/policies/marketing-privacy Niall > On Fri, Jul 18, 202

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Training (Incubating) to Top-Level Project

Is this really a viable TLP? To me it looks more like a project heading to a "dormant" status rather one that is vibrant and expanding. By my count the initial PPMC had 13 members and after six years, its added two and lost ten. I also note that one of the proposed PMC members initially declined a

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-105) Typos in some top-level pages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12755678#action_12755678 ] Niall Pemberton commented on INCUBATOR-105: --- Looks like I don&#x

[jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-109) Amber Status page update

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879770#action_12879770 ] Niall Pemberton commented on INCUBATOR-109: --- I have applied the patch - l

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-288) svn clone of incubator repo takes > 12 hours

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17950928#comment-17950928 ] Niall Pemberton commented on INCUBATOR-288: --- Checking out the follo

<    1   2   3