On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> > wrote: > > Well, the transition is not that hard if: > > > > a) during incubation podling.a.o redirects (302/307) to podling.i.a.o > > > > b) after graduation podling.i.a.o redirects (301) to podling.a.o > > > > right? > > Discussion has quieted down. I plan to claim lazy consensus in a > couple of days and address this situation by opening an INFRA Jira > requesting that redirects be installed per above. I'll post the link > to that issue in this thread. > I agree with what you said earlier - "incubation should be rigorous and short" - and that is possible for some podlings (existing open source projects with a diverse, meritocratic community) - but much harder for others (single company, closed source). One reason for allowing the podling.a.o that has come up for geode is that they need to relocate their Schema locations from their corporate site - if they have to do it once to podling.i.a.o and then later to podling.a.o then its doubly painful for their users. While we don't want podlings to get comfortable, we do want them to succeed and to mininise the pain of transition to their users. As Rob said, if they're following the other branding requirements, then do we need to continue enforcing the subdomain requirement? For me (and on behalf of Geode) I think we she leave the current status quo. Niall > Marvin Humphrey > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
