On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Amol Kekre <a...@datatorrent.com> wrote:
> Niall, > Thanks for catching. I replaced '-' with '_' as per atlassian policy. I am > suspecting that ASF does not allow '_' as none of the project keys have > '_'. I have added a comment that '_' can be removed if that is the policy. > Wiki updated. > I asked on the infra list what the JIRA key format was and whether it could be changed to include underscore and got the following response: "They are all uppercase alpha characters. Sadly it cannot be changed." Niall > > Thks, > Amol > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Niall Pemberton < > niall.pember...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Amol Kekre <a...@datatorrent.com> > wrote: > > > > > oh! We preferred that during our discussion. Somehow we thought there > > was a > > > limit. I have changed it to full names (APEX-CORE, APEX-MALHAR). If > there > > > is a limit we can reduce the number of chars later. wiki is updated. > > > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ApexProposal > > > > > > > Hyphens are not allowed as project keys, but underscore is a possibility. > > The default format is only upper case letters - but you'll need to check > > what ASF has configured. > > > > > > > https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/JIRA/Changing+the+Project+Key+Format > > > > Niall > > > > > > Thks, > > > Amol > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Hitesh Shah <hit...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > If there isn’t a char limit on project names in JIRA, wouldn’t it > just > > be > > > > better to use “APEX-CORE” and “APEX-MALHAR” to match the actual > project > > > > names, repos, etc? > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > — Hitesh > > > > > > > > On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:25 PM, Amol Kekre <a...@datatorrent.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Chris, > > > > > Thanks for articulating what I was going to respond with after > > talking > > > to > > > > > folks here. We indeed see versions for Malhar and Apex differing. > We > > > > expect > > > > > Malhar versions to change much more rapidly than Apex. > > > > > > > > > > Ted, > > > > > We discussed the impact of single jira on versioning. For example > we > > > > > expect Malhar X.0.0 to happen much earlier than Apex X.0.0. There > was > > > > > discomfort in naming versions with prefix. The consensus was to > have > > > > > version numbers convey stuff. If folks don't have strong opinion on > > two > > > > > jiras, we would prefer to use two jiras. We have taken up > Bertrand's > > > > scope > > > > > naming and changed the names of jira projects as follows > > > > > > > > > > APX-CORE > > > > > APX-MLHR > > > > > > > > > > I have changed the wiki to reflect the above as jira project names. > > > > > > > > > > Thks, > > > > > Amol > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Chris Nauroth < > > > > cnaur...@hortonworks.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> One thing to consider is that release version numbers are tied to > > > > specific > > > > >> JIRA projects. If the intention is for Apex and Malhar version > > > numbers > > > > to > > > > >> be independent, then using a single JIRA project could introduce > > some > > > > risk > > > > >> of confusion if an Apex version number accidentally gets applied > to > > a > > > > >> Malhar issue. It might necessitate prefixing the version numbers > > with > > > > >> "apex-" and "malhar-" to differentiate. > > > > >> > > > > >> Based on that, I have a slight preference for separate JIRA > > projects. > > > > >> However, I don't object to using a single unified JIRA project if > > > others > > > > >> feel strongly about it. > > > > >> > > > > >> --Chris Nauroth > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> On 8/11/15, 8:23 AM, "Amol Kekre" <a...@datatorrent.com> wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> Ted, > > > > >>> I agree that repo is more critical than jira instance. I am > taking > > up > > > > your > > > > >>> suggesstion with folks and should get back soon. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Thks > > > > >>> Amol > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Ted Dunning < > > ted.dunn...@gmail.com> > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> I personally see far less reason for separate JIRA instances > than > > > git > > > > >>>> repos. Having all jiras under APEX seems a good choice. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Sent from my iPhone > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:32, Bertrand Delacretaz < > > > > bdelacre...@apache.org > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> As for JIRA, I would apply the same rule, so APX-CORE and > > APX-MHAR > > > > >>>> maybe. > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: > > general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
