On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> having just published a release of Apache RAT with the "-incubating"
> label, I'd though it is time to discuss the future of RAT. RAT is an
> incubator project since 18 months. It is not an overly busy project:
> The occasional fea
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Let me repeat: where does it say a TLP must be "at least THIS size" ?
>
> Answer: nowhere.
>
> Small projects are just fine. We're looking at the overall community
> and the people to shepherd that community. Those are the RAT
> developers and u
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:12, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2010-08-11, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>
>>> The real point though is not size - its *activity*.
>>
>> [absolutely correct observation of low activity
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> Fixed both issues Sebb raised. I doubt either was an impediment to
> graduation, but keep 'em coming. Oh and the votes too! (I fear our
> little vote will get lost in experiment/radical chat).
I just published the changes(ran the ant script
+1
Niall
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
> restart the vote.
>
> Thanks for your patience and consideration.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
>> From: Joe Schaefer
>> T
I think the name is too generic and don't care for it - but as long as
its not offensive or in use elsewhere then this should be up to the
project to decide and the IPMC should stay out.
[X] +1 Change the Lucene Connector Framework to the Apache Connector Framework
Niall
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1
Is there a thread where the Thrift community decided they were ready -
I went looking for one, but couldn't find one quickly
(http://tinyurl.com/34wwn4f)?
Also the thrift status page isn't complete:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/thrift.html
I hope you've done all the necessary IP stuff e
ent through all that in advance of
> making our incubating releases. Someone should have updated the dates on the
> TODOs, I guess.
>
> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
>> Is there a thread where the Thrift community decided they were ready -
>>
Niall
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
>> OK great, +1 from me.
>>
>> The sections that matter are the "Copyright" and "Verify distribution
>> rights". I can update those for you, if you provide the dates.
>>
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Please evaluate the status of your project with respect to graduation. Why,
> for example, are Thrift and JSPWiki not yet ready to fly? What about Ace?
> Others?
The graduation vote for Thrift passed:
http://markmail.org/message/ylxi
+1
Niall
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi IPMC'ers and the rest of the Incubator community,
>
> The OODT community has been discussing graduation to TLP [1]. There is
> overwhelming consensus in the community (all +1 VOTEs including those from
> our mentors)
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 8:20 AM, ant elder wrote:
> I'd like to propose that the process for Incubator poddlings to make
> someone a new committer is simplified so that all that is needed are
> votes from poddling committers and that there is no longer any need
> for votes from Incubator PMC membe
+1
Niall
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Richard Hirsch wrote:
> Hi IPMC'ers and the rest of the Incubator community,
>
> The ESME community has been discussing graduation to TLP [1] and we
> just concluded a vote on the subject [2]. There is
> overwhelming consensus in the community (all +1 VO
+1
Niall
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
>
> The Aries community has been discussing graduation and we feel we are
> ready to graduate to a new TLP [1]. We subsequently voted [2]. As a
> commnunity we were unanimous in deciding to grad
Proposal looks good.
Niall
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> I would like to propose Syncope, an Open Source system for managing
> identities in enterprise environments, implemented in JEE technology,
> originally developed by Tirasa, an Italian IT compan
members of the
> Apache BVal Project:
>
> - Albert Lee
> - Carlos Vara Callau
> - David Jencks
> - Donald Woods
> - Gerhard Petracek
> - Jeremy Bauer
> - Kevan Lee Miller
> - Luciano Resende
> - Matthias Wessendorf
> - Matthew Jason Benson
&
+1
Niall
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all ASF mates,
> I'm writing to submit a new incubator proposal, Apache Syncope.
> Follows below the proposal; this vote will be open for 72 hours and
> will be closed on February 10th (Fri) at 9:00 am CET.
> Many thanks in adva
+1
Niall
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed earlier and now shown below, the HISE community has voted
> to retire the project. Following the retirement guide [1], I now call
> the Incubator PMC to vote on confirming this decision. This vote is
> open for
RAT report on the source distro looks good.
None of the artifacts (zip or jar files) seem to have the incubator
disclaimer notice.
A small but annoying nit: you've gone mad signing and creating
checksums. Rather than just creating 1 signature file and sha & md5
checksums for each file there are
+1
Niall
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi...
>
> It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
> BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
> not, [1], [2] and [3].
> In the past few weeks there has been a [
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
>> From: Jukka Zitting
>> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 2:35 PM
>> Subject: Re: February report review
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wednesday, February 8, 2012, Joe Schaefe
-1 to the poor way this vote was conducted and your response to
peoples concerns.
+1 for Jukka as the new chair.
Niall
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC
> chair and it looks
+1
Niall
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> The graduation guide[1] recommends that the Rat community demonstrates it's
> willingness to govern itself through a free VOTE before asking the IPMC to
> approve graduation. So, here it is :-)
>
> See [2] for a draft of th
+1
Niall
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
>
> Apache Rave entered the Incubator almost 1 year ago on March 1st 2011.
> Since then Rave provided 7 incubator releases, added 3 more committers/PPMC
> members, and shows a steady growth of commu
+1
Niall
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> This is a call for vote to graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator.
>
> Sqoop entered Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added three
> new committers from diverse organizations, added two new PPMC members,
> and m
+1
Niall
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Josh Wills wrote:
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Apache Crunch" for
> incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
> below. We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with phunt as
> Champion, and phunt, tomwhite, and ac
+1
Niall
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> This is a call for vote to graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator.
>
> Flume entered the Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added nine
> new committers and made two signifiant releases following the ASF policies
>
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Let me try this again.
>
>> Chuckwa looks pretty normal; report in place, traffic on mailing list.
>> I don't see any particular cause for concern. It's one of our podlings that
> is all set except for not having added committers. Mentors,
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Upayavira wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012, at 09:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Benson Margulies
>> wrote:
>> > ...It seems to me that the concept of 'project sponsorship' of podlings
>> > is left over from the days of umbrel
On 9/25/07, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the proposed
> Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this
> project, which bodes well for its ability to build a diverse developer
> community.
>
> http://wik
On 9/25/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the purpose of the incubator is to ensure that there is a
> sustainable developer community, so I don't see failure of incubating
> projects as a real problem.
+1
Theres more of an issue IMO with projects that don't come thru the
inc
On 9/30/07, Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please vote on accepting project Imperius into the Apache Incubator. The vote
> will run 1 week,
> until Sunday, Oct. 7, 2007 or until all Incubator PMC members have voted.
>
>
> [X] +1 Accept Imperius project for incubation
Niall
On 10/3/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 10/2/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > i'm thinking more of a benevolent educator than traffic warden
> > > > style reviewer role.
> > >
> > > When it come
+1
Niall
On Oct 30, 2007 10:03 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'd like to propose that the IPMC sponsors the entry of RAT into the incubator
>
> - robert
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For ad
On Nov 20, 2007 9:14 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would agree with reviewing committers at graduation, but how do we
> > implement that?
>
> I would say that this depends on the judgment of the mentors, and it
> is probably more important to evaluate the role they would be p
+1
Niall
On Nov 29, 2007 12:59 AM, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Shindig for incubation
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
>
>
> = Abstract =
>
> Shindig will develop a container
Links to the various relevant threads for anyone interested:
Yoko Threads:
http://tinyurl.com/2y4sy9
http://tinyurl.com/2ffkn2
http://tinyurl.com/2glch9
http://tinyurl.com/2d94hw
Geronimo Discussion: http://tinyurl.com/2zr2bh
Geronimo Vote: http://tinyurl.com/2c
then there needs to be a
statement here about IP clearance here first.
Niall
> thanks,
> dims
>
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > Links to the various relevant threads for anyone interested:
> >
> > Yoko Threads:
> > http://tinyurl.com/2y4sy9
On Dec 12, 2007 10:53 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Gang,
> As the Mentor, I hereby call for a vote to graduate the FtpServer project.
Have they met the exit criteria?
I couldn't see a STATUS file in svn - but the website[1] doesn't have
a date against "Check and make sure tha
ttp://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko/trunk/STATUS
Niall
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > Links to the various relevant threads for anyone interested:
> >
> > Yoko Threads:
> > http://tinyurl.com/2y4s
On Dec 13, 2007 5:46 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 December 2007 19:45, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> > I couldn't see a STATUS file in svn
>
> You have mention this for the Yoko project as well, and I start to wonder who
> of us t
On Dec 13, 2007 4:40 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 December 2007 19:45, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> > Have they met the exit criteria?
> >
> > I couldn't see a STATUS file in svn - but the website[1] doesn't have
> >
+1 to the release (I already voted on tika-dev - wasn't sure whether
its needed to repeat here or not?)
Niall
On Dec 31, 2007 7:20 PM, Chris Mattmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Incubator PMC:
>
> The Tika community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
> Tika 0-1 incubating. Pursu
On Jan 7, 2008 3:53 PM, Chris Mattmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jukka,
>
> I just checked the archives. Thanks very much for the pointer to them. I was
> expecting everything to be CC'ed to tika-dev, sorry about that.
>
> Looks like we have:
>
> 5 +1 Jukka,Craig,ant elder,Niclas,Bertrand
> 0
I've pushed the release out.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> On 1/7/08 7:56 AM, "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 7, 2008 3:53 PM, Chris Mattmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi Jukka,
&
On Jan 7, 2008 5:10 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2008 5:46 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >... http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html
>
> > ...I've refreshed that page in svn from committee-info.
+1
Niall
On Jan 5, 2008 7:27 PM, Bill Stoddard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who made contributions to this proposal and special
> thanks to Niclas and Aaron for stepping up as mentors. The project is
> documented here:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BlueSky
>
> Please vot
On Jan 20, 2008 9:22 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As we all know, I just love redundant meta-data ... :-\
>
> We have at least three lists for PMC Membership:
>
> 1) committee-info.txt
> 2) asf-authorization#incubator-pmc
> 3) [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lists subscriptions
On Jan 22, 2008 6:23 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the terminology in the subject is wrong.
>
> You are not "moving a failed incubation project." That project is dead.
>
> What you can do is to use the code in another project, and assume all
> responsibility to verify tha
nd image.
If we throw our weight around that IMO goes against what our own
license permits, then thats going to damage the ASF's "brand image"
and its liberal license. I can't see how this could ever be official
policy, but we should stop saying it until it is.
Niall
> Pau
ll
P.S. The I agree the real issue with this code is the provenance point.
> Paul
>
>
> On Jan 22, 2008 8:50 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 22, 2008 8:27 PM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I agree with the general p
On Jan 23, 2008 11:26 AM, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton schrieb:
> > On Jan 23, 2008 7:23 AM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Niall
> >>
> >> Asking someone politely to rename the package is har
I would be happy to be a mentor for PDFBox - not done mentoring before
so if you can get someone more experienced then I'll bow out no
problem. Also I also haven't used PDFBox or even looked at it, but I
am interested in it (use iText alot) - so not sure whether thats a -ve
or not wrt mentoring.
N
On Jan 30, 2008 7:24 AM, Mark Slee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> *If I look at the initial committers list, I see a big portion to be
> facebook developers. During incubation you should work on diversifying.*
>
> *Again, it seems like a huge contingent of facebook developers. You
> re
ubator/PDFBoxProposal. We ask the
> Incubator PMC to sponsor the PDFBox podling, with myself, Jeremias
> Maerki, and Niall Pemberton as the mentors.
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and only votes from the
> Incubator PMC are binding.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept PDFBox as a
I'm happy with the reponses given so +1 to Thrift from me.
Niall
On Jan 24, 2008 2:07 AM, Mark Slee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've just posted the Apache Incubator proposal for Thrift onto the
> Wiki:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ThriftProposal
>
> For those who prefer readi
+1
Niall
On Feb 9, 2008 4:09 PM, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've had an initial discussion, which attracted a number of messages
> of encouragement, and identified no issues or concerns. Then we
> proceeded onto a proposal, which attracted three excellent mentors.
> Now it is time to
On Feb 8, 2008 12:27 AM, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's my binding +1 on the Thrift proposal.
>
> On Jan 23, 2008 9:07 PM, Mark Slee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We've just posted the Apache Incubator proposal for Thrift onto the
> > Wiki:
> > http://wiki.apache.or
+1
Niall
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After 20 months in the incubator, 6 releases complete and 2 more on the
> way shortly, several new committers, and too much email traffic :-), the
> Apache CXF community (with support from our mentors) feels t
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:11 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > On 3/27/08, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > This release is tagged at:
> >> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.5-incubator/
> >>
> >> -1: ther
Firstly, I'm +1 on this release. I have a few minor
comments/suggestions which you may want to consider for the next
release (or not!)
1) Theres a parent pom for apache which if you make the parent of the
uimaj pom means you don't have to duplicate the license and
organization details in your poms
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, Sorry for our carelessness.
> We clearly overlooked the mention of the champion/mentor qualifications.
>
>
> > can you elaborate on who of the initial committers are ASF
> > members? Maybe you meant committers?
>
>
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Jeff Eastman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Oh, Sorry for our carelessness.
> > >
+1
Niall
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:51 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After 29 months in the incubator, 19 releases, 25 new committers, and
> tons of emails the Apache Tuscany community (with support from our
> mentors) again feels that we are ready to graduate to an official top
> lev
+1
Niall
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Edward J. Yoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Incubator PMC,
>
> There has been some discussion around the Hama proposal,
> and we would now like to officially propose Hama to the Incubator
> for consideration, with Grant Ingersoll's +1.
>
> Please vo
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:04 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30/05/2008, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I personally think we have conflicting rules in the way we handle
>> incubator releases.
>>
>>
>>
>> On the one hand, we require incubator releases to be in a separate
>>
+1
Niall
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have:
> ---
> Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted to the
> Incubator private list. The notice is a separate email forward
[X] +1 Accept Empire-DB for incubation
Niall
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried running mvn:site on the source distro, but it failed
generating the javadocs because the uimaj-as pom.xml specifies
1.4 for the javadoc plugin and there are JDK 1.5+
features used. When I changed that to "1.5" the javadocs generation
then failed throwing a MissingResourceException with the
+1
Niall
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This vote will run until Monday, July 21st, 2008.
>
> [ ] +1 Accept Click for incubation
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Reject for the following reason:
>
>
> = Click Proposal =
>
> This prop
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:23 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug Cutting wrote:
>>
>> There's no conspiracy here to steal Apacheness. Rather, Yahoo!, Intel and
>> CMU would like to collaborate on open source software. Intel and CMU have a
>> prototype, and Yahoo! is intere
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 29, 2008, at 6:23 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
>>> As explained in INCUBATOR-80, the Table of Contents
>>> of the policy document is inconsistent and contains
>>> broken links.
>>
>> OK. And nice of you to fix i
+1
Niall
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote on accepting Tashi into the Incubator.
>
> Tashi's proposal is at:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TashiProposal
>
> Thanks!
>
> Doug
>
>
-
+1
Niall
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> please vote on accepting project PicaGalley
> (originally proposed under the name of Caitrin)
> for incubation, with the Incubator PMC as the Sponsor.
>
> This vote runs until Sun 2008-08-10 24:00 GMT,
+1
Niall
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Jörn Kottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please vote again to release the Cas Editor. The first vote was
> rejected, because the ICU license and notice was
> missing, this is now fixed, see UIMA-1115.
>
> On the uima-dev list there were 5 +1
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 6:29 PM, scott comer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as a scientist, i am getting somewhat bristly at all the rumor, innuendo,
> and hyperbole around names. i've not seen any definitive or measurable steps
> that can be take to ensure success. we're also ignoring the silent maj
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Olga Natkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for quick feedback! A couple of follow up questions inline.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ant elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:07 AM
>> To: general@incubator.ap
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The current tally is extremely close (9 +1 vs. 8 -1 binding)
>> I don't want to close an issue with such a small margin.
>
> I suggest that we should not change policy on anything like this lack of
> concensus. I do, ho
1, 12 -1, and one 0 binding votes.
>
>+1 Bertrand Delacretaz
>+1 Brett Porter
>+1 Bruce Snyder
>+1 Davanum Srinivas
>+1 Doug Cutting
>+1 Guillaume Nodet
>+1 James Strachan
>+1 Jason van Zyl
>+1 Jeffrey Genender
> +1 Jukka Zitting
&g
+1
Niall
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please vote on accepting Droids into incubation.
>
> The proposal can be found at:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DroidsProposal
>
> The text of the proposal
>
> = Droids, an intelligent standalone robot f
+1
Niall
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi;
>
> Incubator PMC, this is the repetition for the [VOTE] process for the
> OpenWebBeans proposal. If acceptable, please vote on the proposal until 27
> Oct.
>
> PS : The following fellows voted positively
+1
Niall
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 9:14 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Kato proposal has been out for discussion for a few weeks now,
> please vote on accepting the Kato project for incubation.
>
> The full Kato proposal is available at the end of this message and as
> a wiki page a
I haven't been following CouchDB but a PMC of five seems small - you
only have to loose a couple of people and you're on the verge of not
being a viable project. I took a look through the lists and from what
I can see CouchDB entered incubation with four committers in February
(the proposal listed
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall,
>
> thanks for your feedback.
>
> On Nov 4, 2008, at 01:53, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
>> I haven't been following CouchDB but a PMC of five seems small - you
>> only have to l
+1
Niall
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev list
> that Qpid
> would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator PMC felt
> that the
> Qpid project should increase its
+1
Niall
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Garrett Rooney
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private
> list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose
> that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It's been quite the
> lo
+1
Niall
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while,
> and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to
> call a vote. I know there are some other potential mentors and or
>
Vote thread:
http://incubator.markmail.org/message/etebbem2edy36cft
Niall
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Charles Matthew Chen
wrote:
> Apache Sanselan is a pure-Java image library which supports reading
> and writing image data and metadata from a variety of file formats. An
> new propose
I have created a JIRA ticket for some minor build improvements[1]:
* Add standard manifest entries to jar
* Lock down version numbers for maven compiler, surefire and javadoc plugins
* generate sources jar for the release
* include the RELEASE-NOTES in the binary distribution
* include NOTICE/
All the aritifacts look good to me and I built and ran the tests
sucesssfully on JDK 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6.
So +1 from me.
Niall
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Charles Matthew Chen
wrote:
> Apache Sanselan is a pure-Java image library which supports reading
> and writing image data and metadata
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> Well, the point is: we are talking about small libraries.
>>
>> Imagine there is library X which was developed by only 2 developers.
>> They want to bring this code to Commons. What
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
>
>> You're insinuating too much here. Simply put the commons PMC would
>> want to see committers in action before making them full blown Commons
>>
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Seems like perfect timing :)
>
> We just discussed our options last week in the Sanselan project. As
> Craig already summarized this, Sanselan has these options: graduate into
> commons (incubator), indefinite incubation, expulsion from Ap
+1
Niall
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Karl Pauls wrote:
> Please vote on accepting Apache Ace for incubation at the Apache
> Incubator. The full proposal is available at the end of this message
> and as a wiki page at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AceProposal. We
> ask the Incubator PMC t
Comparing the original proposal to the graduation resolution it seems
that click entered incubation with 4 committers and proposes to leave
with 3.
IMO a PMC of three is not enough - one person disappears and you can't
get the three votes required to do anything.
Niall
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Jeremias Maerki
wrote:
> On 18.04.2009 22:03:53 Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>> Hi, Craig,
>>
>> I'm personally not sure that commons would be the best fit for
>> Sanselan. Despite the name, I'd consider the commons of xmlgraphics
>> (despite the name, this is not only
base a decision on graduation.
Niall
> Andrus
>
>
> On Apr 24, 2009, at 1:25 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
>> Comparing the original proposal to the graduation resolution it seems
>> that click entered incubation with 4 committers and proposes to leave
>> with 3.
>>
The "Incubator PMC" link in the "On The General Mailing List" section is broken.
Niall
On 8/23/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thanks to everyone who reviewed and improved this document after the
first call for review. this is a final call for review. if no
objections are p
Looks good to me (although I've haven't been around incubator that
long), one point:
In the "Background" section theres a link to "podling websites" which
points to info about the incubator website:
i.e. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html
which I think should point to the info a
On 10/2/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 1, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
> This is why I keep pushing back with the idea that we bootstrap in
> a defined
> manner:
>
> - The Incubator PMC sets the Mentors, who form the initial PPMC
> - The PPMC (Mentors) elect
101 - 200 of 273 matches
Mail list logo
