On Nov 20, 2007 9:14 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would agree with reviewing committers at graduation, but how do we > > implement that? > > I would say that this depends on the judgment of the mentors, and it > is probably more important to evaluate the role they would be playing > in the project once it is over to Apache, than what happened before > entering incubation. > > > Would you kick out people during graduation, if they don't show > > sufficient merit? > > I don't think you can make rules for that. Imho it's simple. The > project has to prove it can behave the Apache way, and the project's > members are responsible for this. People not functioning well in a > project can be a reason to reject incubation, so the members better > make sure that doesn't happen. > > > Or re-elect all committers before graduation? > > That might be a good idea actually.
Ask people to self nominate - I imagine often inactive commiters won't put themselves forward, removing any issue. Then maybe a review of the list by the the mentors and proposed PMC Chair. If there are issues it can be discussed in the community and if theres disagreement then vote. I imagine most of the time it won't come to voting. Niall > Eelco --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
