[PROPOSAL] Lucene4c

I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project for incubation. Lucene4c is a port of the Lucene search engine from Java to C, using the Apache Portable Runtime library for portability. The project is far from complete, and code to date is primarily concerned with reading an existing Lucene index, whi

Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c

Erik Hatcher wrote: I presume this codebase is substantial enough that it requires incubation? Or because it was a single developer, could he contribute it directly to the Lucene project and bypass incubation? It's currently about 6500 lines of C code. I'm not sure what the cutoff point is (or

Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c

Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if only to do the required IP checklist. Right. By my question is why doesn't this go through the Lucene project? The Lucene PMC could bring the codebase into

Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c

Cliff Schmidt wrote: Garrett, You're right that all new code bases should come through the Incubator. However, the appropriate PMC to vote on whether it should be accepted into the incubator is the sponsoring PMC, which in this case appears to be the Lucene PMC. (The Incubator PMC does sponsor som

Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c

Noel J. Bergman wrote: I'd gladly bring the codebase into Lucene's repository if that is the consensus. It was created entirely by Garrett and he's agreed to donate it, so the IP should be pretty clear cut. Do you have a community for it, or just a place? If this isn't something that the Lucene

Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c

Erik Hatcher wrote: The Lucene PMC has unanimously voted to accept the Lucene4c codebase. Let's bring it into incubation! What's next? I figure this probably fell off most people's radar over the weekend, but just so there's something sitting in the top of the inbox, ping? From a "getting the pr

Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c

Erik Hatcher wrote: Getting the Forrest website going would be a good step to tackle. See the Incubator site for some details, as well as cloning how Nutch is set up: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nutch.html Well, I don't think I have the karma to commit to the incubator section of

Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c

Garrett Rooney wrote: Erik Hatcher wrote: Getting the Forrest website going would be a good step to tackle. See the Incubator site for some details, as well as cloning how Nutch is set up: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nutch.html Well, I don't think I have the karma to comm

Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c

David Crossley wrote: Oh, i hate to see stuff go unanswered - i don't know the procedure either but will try my best. With the outcome of this we should create a very simple Guidelines document to show the steps. Erik Hatcher wrote: If there are things that I can do to give Garrett karma or update

Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c

David Crossley wrote: Garrett Rooney wrote: David Crossley wrote: 2) Add the status page and update website: http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html#Updating+the+site As a mentor, Erik, you should be able to add it. If someone can clarify the acceptance then i will add it. Okay, i have

Lucene4c imported into Subversion

Thanks to Justin Erenkrantz's help getting us set up with Subversion, Lucene4c has been imported into the ASF incubator repository. Get it while it's hot at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene4c/trunk/ Commit mails are currently going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (although the initial im

Re: log4net related IP questions

Ceki Gülcü wrote: Nicko Cadell has compiled a list [1] of additional log4net dependencies. Could someone of a higher authority confirm that they are OK? In particular, log4net is built using GPL-licensed Nant, is that a problem from the foundation's point of view? I obviously don't speak with an

Re: Derby page updated

David Crossley wrote: Jeremy Boynes wrote: I updated the page and was waiting for site regeneration but thought I would give it a go. I already re-generated the page and committed it to svn yesterday. With the infrastructure changes is minotaur still the right host to use? I am confused about t

Re: Derby page updated

Otis Gospodnetic wrote: Unfortunately, I think sites are not being (r)synced every 4 hours. I made changes to the Lucene web site several days ago (ssh to minotaur, svn up under /www/lucene). Maybe somebody on infrastructure will know what is happening. No rush for Lucene. That's odd, I did t

Re: Derby page updated

Otis Gospodnetic wrote: How long ago did you do that? svn up used to work a week or so ago. This was on March 26th. svn up should still work, it'll just take up to 4 hours before that data is synced over to ajax, the machine currently serving up the apache.org sites. If it's not getting synced

Re: Derby page updated

Jeremy Boynes wrote: Garrett Rooney wrote: David Crossley wrote: Jeremy Boynes wrote: I updated the page and was waiting for site regeneration but thought I would give it a go. I already re-generated the page and committed it to svn yesterday. With the infrastructure changes is minotaur still

Re: searchable mailing list archives

Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: Where BTW do I find the sources to mod_mbox? ;-) You can grab it from SVN at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_mbox/trunk/ -garrett - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addit

Re: WADI mailing lists

On 12/14/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm looking at doing the mail lists for WADI. > > The wiki says > > wadi-dev > wadi-user > etc... > > but is this > > @incubator or @geronimo? > > Yes, the G PMC is the sponsor, but WADI could potentially be a TLP... Historically I belie

Re: AJAX Toolkit Framework Proposal

On 12/21/05, Ted Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd love to have a good AJAX project here at Apache, but I'm not at > all convinced that this is the best way to get it. I also talked to > Alex Russell at Dojo about coming to the ASF (at this year's OSCON), > and the overhead thing was alread

Re: Setting up mailing list for Lucene.Net

On 12/22/05, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Does anyone happen to know how or what I need to do to setup mailing list(s) > for Lucene.Net? I have been trying to find out how for the past few days > without much luck. > > I am trying to finish off the infrastructure set

Re: Setting up mailing list for Lucene.Net

On 12/22/05, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Garrett, > > 1) Is this where Jira is: > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa Yep, that's it. Use the "Mailing Lists" component in the Infrastructure project. > 2) What are the minimum mailing list that I will need? I am

Re: [policy] bring in full code history on incubated project?

> > a consensus, yet. Close. > > I'm swayed. +1 on a policy of importing history whenever possible and > desired by the incoming proposal. > > > I did talk with Garrett Rooney, and we can resolve the authorship namespace > > problem, so we can take that particular

Re: [VOTE] accept Solr into incubator

On 1/10/06, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > Are there any other mentors? I think I saw some people say they would be > > interested, but I don't see their names on the proposal. -- justin > > Erik Hatcher & myself are mentors. Do we need more? I believe th

Re: Lists set up for Yoko podling

On 2/21/06, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I sent subscription messages to yoko-commits-subscribe, yoko-dev-subscribe, > and yoko-user-subscribe, but the server returned them saying that there's no > such mail boxes. Is it really set up? Uhh, did you see the "I request" at the beginning

Podling Mailing Lists

Greetings from infrastructure land. I was recently setting up the Subversion resources for the new Webwork podling (http://incubator.apache.org/projects/webwork2.html) and I ran into something interesting. The request was for creation of the repository space in incubator as with any other podling

Re: Podling Mailing Lists

On 2/24/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/23/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Since this project is central to the future of Struts (Struts Action > > anyways), we want to give it high visibility by emailing commits to our dev > > list, along side existing Shale an

Re: Error when committing updated status document

On 3/13/06, Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just updated the Woden status document on the incubator website. The > file built fine and looks good on my machine. I committed the XML file > (woden.xml) without issue. When I try to commit the HTML file (woden.html) > I consistently get

Re: Lucene.Net mailing list

On 3/14/06, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have the following JIRA issue open: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-655 -- it has been open for a > while. Who is tasked by setting up the required mailing list so that I can > get Lucene.Net infrastructure comple

Re: ActiveMQ and ServiceMix reports

On 3/15/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do these really have to be "Apache" credits accumulated? Let's do a > hypothetical situation. Let's say that some guy puts in a few years of > his life into a CodeHaus project. Then, he has a kid. At that time the > project moves to ASF

Re: [web] 'svn up' complained "Failed to add file 'projects/lucene.net.html' ..."

On 3/16/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I updated cayenne's status page and got an error regarding > projects/lucene.net.html when I did 'svn up' on people.apache.org: > >-bash-2.05b$ svn up >Uprojects/cayenne.html >svn: Failed to add file 'projects/lucene.net.html

Re: Incubation Process and PPMCs

On 3/20/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > > > Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > > >> Here are the SVN names for > >> everyone who has committed to each of the trees: > > > (Question : are those pe

Re: Incubation Process and PPMCs

On 3/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Garrett Rooney wrote: > > On 3/20/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> Geir Magnusson

Re: Incubation Process and PPMCs

On 3/20/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Garrett Rooney wrote: > > On 3/20/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>My question was slightly different, rela

Re: Incubation Process and PPMCs

On 3/20/06, Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > Oh! I thought that the sysadmin loads preserved history... > > I believe they do -- they just don't add themselves > to the history. But if you know the

Re: Why am I getting those emails? (was: FW: MODERATE for lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org)

On 4/23/06, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Brett and all, OK, I believe I got it now (at least I tested it and it works.) I had to reply to the subscription email and not send an email to the "accept-" one -- this is to fix my problem of why when I send an email to the list I am st

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >  Subversion is a version control system.  You probably know it well as > it is the version control system employed by the Apache Software > Foundation. +1 -garrett - To unsubs

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:59 PM, C. Michael Pilato > wrote: > >> Subversion client and server that doesn't use a DAV layer at all.  The >> Subversion community has never released binaries -- ever -- not do we plan >> to. > > That would a

Re: [VOTE] Subversion podling for graduation

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > Hello all, > > I started a discussion thread a week-ish ago to seek out issues for > Subversion's graduation. The couple bits that were raised[1] have been > handled, I believe. So with that said, I am unaware of any potential > showstoppers, a

Re: [PROPOSAL] JSPWiki

On 9/6/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/6/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > While agreeing that it's something that needs looking at closely, I'm > > not I'm not sure it's downbeat as I think you're suggesting. The > > 3rd-party licencing policy at http://www.apac

Re: Incubator Proposal: Pig

On 9/18/07, Lawrence Mandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Is there any particular reason you want this podling to be sponsored > >by the Incubator PMC (which is generally done for projects that intend > >to turn into their own top level project) > > Is this true? I thought all new projects had to g

Re: Incubator Proposal: Pig

On 9/18/07, Olga Natkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Yahoo! research and development teams have developed a proposal below. The > proposal is also available on wiki at > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PigProposal. > We would like to ask

Re: Incubator Proposal: Pig

On 9/18/07, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Garrett Rooney wrote: > > Is there any particular reason you want this podling to be sponsored > > by the Incubator PMC (which is generally done for projects that intend > > to turn into their own top level pro

Re: [VOTE] accept Pig into Incubator

On 9/25/07, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to call the Incubator PMC to vote to incubate the proposed > Pig project. Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this > project, which bodes well for its ability to build a diverse developer > community. > > http://wik

Re: [VOTE] Release Abdera 0.3.0-incubating

On 9/27/07, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, we have made a couple of bug fixes and, more importantly, we have > softened the bouncy castle dependency and will no longer ship that jar. > This release has been well tested and reviewed and has received the > requisite number of +1's fr

Re: [VOTE] Release Abdera 0.3.0-incubating

On 9/27/07, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2. No ASF Copyright in your NOTICE files. As described here -- http:// > www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice. There should be a > copyright notice for the work that's occurring within the Abdera > project, itself. Umm, yes it is. It'

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Abdera 0.4.0-incubating (updated)

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:56 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Probably. > Though if the AL header affects the parsing, then there may well be a > problem with the parsing... Please. Are you actually suggesting that it's a good idea to make all of our test cases demonstrably different fro

Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of Apache Abdera 0.4.0-incubating (updated)

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd probably error on the side of caution here, and add license > headers in all files, unless it breakes something. Most if not all > projects does add the license headers in maven pom files, property > files, etc. I'

Re: [VOTE] Release Abdera 0.4.0-incubating Take 7

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:10 PM, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, we've updated the release candidate... please review > > Take 7 of the vote to release Apache Abdera 0.4.0-incubating. The > following things have changed: > - All necessary files now include ASL headers > - LICENSE

Feedback on Abdera Graduation

I'd like to propose that the Abdera project move on to graduate from the incubator and become its own top level project. The project has been operating well for some time, with a small but steady stream of bugs being reported and fixed by a small but diverse group of developers. The major problem

[VOTE] Abdera Graduation to TLP

ons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of The Apache Abdera Project: - James M. Snell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Garrett Rooney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Stephen Duncan Jr. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Ugo Cei ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Dan Diephouse ([EMAIL PRO

Re: [VOTE] Abdera Graduation to TLP

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private > list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose > that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It

Re: [VOTE] Abdera Graduation to TLP

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Garrett Rooney > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private >> list > > Why wasn't thi

Re: [VOTE] Abdera Graduation to TLP

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Garrett Rooney wrote: >> >> The discussion included determining the list of people to put on the >> final PMC list. The actual list of Abdera committers was larger, but >> many of

Re: [VOTE] Abdera Graduation to TLP

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:54 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Garrett Rooney wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. >>> I'm presuming there was not a dev@ vote yet by the Abdera community itself? >>> If not, c

Re: [VOTE] Abdera Graduation to TLP

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private > list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose > that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It

Re: Abdera graduated, still incubating?

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Abdera graduated (CONGRATS!). We voted +1 for their graduation, their > resolution was put in front of the board and it passed. So why does > the clutch status page still consider them incubating? I don't know where clut

Re: Abdera graduated, still incubating?

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Martijn Dashorst > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Abdera graduated (CONGRATS!). We voted +1 for their graduation, their >> resolution was put in front of the bo

Re: Abdera graduated, still incubating?

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:09 AM, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You probably found out, but it gets its data from various sources: > http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#notes > Whatever it gets fed. > > I will be pleased to see if Clutch works for you. > My crappy first attempt at

Re: The graduation of Buildr and Abdera... + Rant

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Gang, > I think that the Graduation of these two projects have not been 'clean'. > Both are still listed as Incubating Projects on projects/index.html, > as well as part of the Incubator project navigation. > Buildr is not listed in projects

Re: The graduation of Buildr and Abdera... + Rant

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Gang, > I think that the Graduation of these two projects have not been 'clean'. > Both are still listed as Incubating Projects on projects/index.html, > as well as part of the Incubator project navigation. > Buildr is not listed in projects

Re: The graduation of Buildr and Abdera... + Rant

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > Wow, this reminds me of the moments when I ask my children to clean up > the mess they created when happily playing. > And I get very grumpy when _I_ am the one who cleans up in the end, > because I some other stuff to do, too. But hey -

Re: Please change Open JPA to OpenJPA

On 5/8/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: done Everyone will have to re-check out at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openjpa No need to recheckout, you can just do a svn switch to the new URL. -garrett

Re: Please change Open JPA to OpenJPA

On 5/8/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: or that :) Oh, this gives me a chance to tease Garrett : Riddle : How does Mr. SVN say "That's an incorrect or invalid URL specified the move command"? Answer : svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/' svn: PROPFIND of '/': 405 Method Not Al

Re: Please change Open JPA to OpenJPA

On 5/9/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 04:54:39PM -0700, Garrett Rooney wrote: > On 5/8/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Oh, this gives me a chance to tease Garrett : > > > >Riddle : > > > >How doe

Re: Please change Open JPA to OpenJPA

On 5/9/06, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Garrett, I tried to switch my svn workspace but it didn't work. Instead of me showing my ignorance, could you please tell me which directory I should be in and what svn command to execute to perform the switch? Well, if you have a worki

Re: Please change Open JPA to OpenJPA

On 5/9/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On May 9, 2006, at 2:14 AM, Leo Simons wrote: > Riddle: > > What would Mr. SVN say if he was written in java? > > /me *ducks* and runs around the corner > > LSD I think he would say "Gee what should I work on now, since I totally finished wri

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

On 5/22/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, The following is a new project incubation proposal. We welcome your feedback and would like to extend a invitation for participation including mentors. The proposal is also located at http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/AriProposal Th

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

On 5/22/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's fine. We've gone through a number of names internally and pretty much gave up on trying to come up with something good. Alternative name suggestions would be greatly appreciated. :-) How about "Democritus"? For those who haven't been

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

On 5/22/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Not good: http://www.jtauber.com/demokritos FTR, the names we've kicked around include "Covalence" (too close to Covalent), "Valencia" (Spanish for "Valence"), atomos (Latin root for "Atom"), and chimie (French for chemistry). Our lawyers did

Re: [VOTE] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

On 5/31/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This proposal seems to have generated a lot of geniune interest, so now I'm calling for a vote for the Incubator to formally accept it. A few editorial comments: at this point, I have little doubt that this codebase will attract a diverse and susta

Re: [VOTE-RESULT] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

On 6/5/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sam Ruby wrote: With the following votes cast: +1 Sam Ruby +1 Garrett Rooney +1 Paul Fremantle +1 Davanum Srinivas +1 Yoav Shapira +1 Jim Jagielski +1 Robert Burrell Donkin +1 Martin Cooper +1 Geir Magnusson Jr ... thi

Re: [VOTE-RESULT] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

On 6/5/06, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Garrett Rooney wrote: > On 6/5/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> With the following votes cast: >> >> +1 Sam Ruby >> +1 Garrett Rooney >> +1 Paul Freman

Re: [VOTE-RESULT] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

On 6/5/06, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mailing lists: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-829 Repository: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/abdera/ Initial committers: abdera=eliast,rubys,yoavs James M Snell and Robert Yates do not have CLAs or accounts. Bugzilla:

Re: [VOTE-RESULT] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

On 6/6/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/abdera.html Note that this URL won't work for an hour or so, until it gets rsynced over to Ajax. -garrett - To unsubscr

Re: [VOTE-RESULT] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

On 6/6/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I faxed my CLA in this afternoon. Great, as soon as it's acked by the ASF Secretary we'll get root@ to set up your account. As soon as my user account is set up, I can check in the initial drop of the code. I believe we'll also need the s

Re: Branding of Incubator projects

On 6/26/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm left very unclear about what is allowed in a press release and what isn't. Examples might be helpful. Based on my confusion, I also don't understand why a press release saying that project X is starting incubation with community members x

Re: Graduate Synapse - was Re: [VOTE] Release Synapse

On 7/6/06, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am spending many hours working through Apache processes so do you mind if I ask a few questions: For the graduation, a.) what are the demographics of the commiters added to the project in the community building and how/is this considered in

Re: [doc] IRC guidelines (was Re: Extensible Ajax Platform (XAP) Project Update)

On 7/11/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote: > "IRC can be used by a podling to bring new people up to speed (e.g. > Q&A between available committers and interested users/contributors), > although such sessions should be archived an

Re: Dormancy

On 7/17/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We have several projects that appear to be dormant, so let's discuss what that means in terms of operational mechanics. FWIW, It's merely the lack of a clue as to what needs to be changed that's kept me from closing down lucene4c. Well, th

Re: Dormancy

On 7/17/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Garrett Rooney wrote: > FWIW, It's merely the lack of a clue as to what needs to be changed > that's kept me from closing down lucene4c. That, and Agila and a couple of others, prompted my e-mail. > > I'

Re: piling on

On 7/19/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I believe that it is a bad idea to allow people to add themselves to a proposal as committers without first obtaining the consent of the person(s) making the proposal. Being a committer in the incubator is giving a person the right to veto c

Re: piling on

On 7/19/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: are you referring to mentors as well? Personally, yes, I feel this should apply to mentors as well. While there are cases where a mentor needs commit access for some sort of procedural issues (maintaining STATUS files, helping to fix up licens

Re: piling on

On 7/19/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1. As a member of an incubating project I totally agree with this. What I didn't know is that there was a policy that allowed anyone to just declare themselves committers without consensus of the existing project participants? I don't be

Re: piling on

On 7/19/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Garrett Rooney wrote: > Personally, yes, I feel this should apply to mentors as well. The Mentors are all Incubator PMC members, and the Incubator PMC as a whole oversees all Incubator projects. Every Incubator PMC member has

Re: piling on

On 7/19/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Garrett Rooney wrote: > Sure, but I think it should be made clear to mentors that the fact > that nothing is preventing them from committing changes to the project > they mentor doesn't mean that they should do so wi

Re: Blaze and Openness of Standards (was Re: [Proposal] Blaze)

On 7/27/06, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After debate, and many trademark searches we have selected new name that is free of any trademarks in the software space. ( not that easy) The new name for Blaze is Glasgow. I will update the wiki. How about the Glasgow Haskell Compiler?

Re: Blaze and Openness of Standards (was Re: [Proposal] Blaze)

On 7/27/06, Carl Trieloff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Garrett Some of us spoke about this at lunch. As Glasgow is part of the university name, "Glasgow Haskell" it should not present a conflict. In addition, our legal department has conducted a trademark search of the word "Glasgow" and come up

Re: Abdera 0.1.0 Release Candidate (please review)

On 7/26/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Abdera podling has reached a point where the committers feel we're ready to cut a 0.1.0 "developer preview" / "developer milestone" release. We have +1's from all committers [1] and zero -1's. The release candidate is available at: http:/

Re: Abdera 0.1.0 Release Candidate (please review)

On 7/30/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/26/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Abdera podling has reached a point where the committers feel we're > ready to cut a 0.1.0 "developer preview" / "developer milestone" > release. We have +1's from all committer

Re: question about naming

On 7/31/06, sophitia que <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/31/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is it intended that either of the two mentions (specifically just > the URL) satisfy this requirement? I.e., that something like this > be sufficient on a third party web page that disc

Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator

I'm sorry, but I have to vote -1 (binding). I'm not in favor of the ASF endorsing a specification that seems to be completely under the control of a small number of companies with no way for new developers to participate in its development. The fact that we have done this in the past is unfortun

Re: horses and carts; was: Accept Glasgow into Incubator

On 8/3/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mads, I'm not sure if you meant to vote, but it raises a dialog so I'm forking the subject. Mads Toftum wrote: > I very much agree with Garretts concerns - and would be much in favor of > not bringing the project into incubation before t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator

On 8/4/06, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Danny Angus wrote: > I think it is about time that we grew up and introduced a rule which > prevents words already used as proper nouns from being proposed as > project names unless there is some real and relevant on-topic > connection. Just by way

Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator

On 8/4/06, J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/3/06, Mads Toftum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 05:54:14PM -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote: > > I'm sorry, but I have to vote -1 (binding). > > > I very much agree with Garretts conce

Re: [VOTE] Accept Glasgow into Incubator

On 8/4/06, Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Of course everyone should make their own minds about this after a careful reading of the threads (and may see things differently), but I wouldn't have agreed to champion the proposal if I had the sense there was not a commitment to create

Re: [Vote] Re: Abdera 0.1.0 Release Candidate

On 8/14/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok, so we've addressed most of the issues raised in the note below and believe we are ready to move forward with 0.1.0. The new zips are available at http://people.apache.org/~jmsnell +1 from me (binding) -garrett -

Re: [Vote] Re: Abdera 0.1.0 Release Candidate

On 8/14/06, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 8/14/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, so we've addressed most of the issues raised in the note below and > believe we are ready to move forward with 0.1.0. The new zips are > available a

Re: Jini : Separate Governance and Implementation Projects

On 8/15/06, Bob Scheifler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > We have a tradition, for good reason, for not giving our projects > "technology domain" ownership for implementations. I'd never support > "Apache EMail" or "Apache Web". It would help me if you could explain how th

Re: [Vote] Re: Abdera 0.1.0 Release Candidate

On 8/15/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i'm +1 Ok, that's one from Robert and one from me, does anyone else on the PMC care to chime in? -garrett - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additiona

Re: Incubator Lightning Talks at ApacheCon US?

On 9/6/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hiya everyone, At ApacheCon US in Austin next month, we're scheduled to have a two-hour block for "Incubator Lightning Talks." (Thursday 4:30-6:30pm) This time is roughly to do as "we" see fit. Our initial idea was to have short (15-min?

  1   2   >