On 8/4/06, Gordon Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Danny Angus wrote: > I think it is about time that we grew up and introduced a rule which > prevents words already used as proper nouns from being proposed as > project names unless there is some real and relevant on-topic > connection. Just by way of explanation, this name was proposed as (a) it is where the project began and (b) it is a port, which was felt to have a loose association with messaging. As a connection (a) is certainly real, though I can understand that the relevance of (b) might be viewed as rather tenuous.
Note that these reasons would have been obvious if the discussion on what to change the name to had happened in public... -garrett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
