On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd probably error on the side of caution here, and add license > headers in all files, unless it breakes something. Most if not all > projects does add the license headers in maven pom files, property > files, etc. I'd suggest you to fix at least in trunk, but as you > mentioned you need to fix the the file below [1], I'd then recommend > fixing as much as possible from the list you have. > > [1] core/src/main/resources/abderamessages.properties
For crying out loud, we've had this freaking argument every single time abdera has released. There is zero reason to add license headers to two line properties files, test data that is explicitly testing atom content as it exists in the real world (where it would NOT have any license headers), or any number of other cases in that list. If you have specific examples of things you do think need licenses, cite them. Saying "everything that you can slap a license header on without breaking something" is not helpful, see the archives of this list for details. -garrett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
