On 9/6/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/6/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > While agreeing that it's something that needs looking at closely, I'm > > not I'm not sure it's downbeat as I think you're suggesting. The > > 3rd-party licencing policy at http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html > > redirects to the draft at http://people.apache.org/~rubys/3party.html, > > but that suggests that, especially for use in binary form, licences > > such as CDDL or CPL aren't necessarily incompatible... > > > Right. However, as you noted, that's a draft, so it may change. I hope it > does.
So you're expecting JSPWIki to be held to a standard that doesn't exist even in the draft documentation that we have for such things? That seems rather extreme. I'd suggest that such discussion belongs on the legal discuss mailing list, as opposed to on the incubator list. -garrett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
