nMoin
Proposal for new project JDO
19 Nov 2004, Craig Russell (craig dot russell at sun dot com)
(updated 23 Nov 2004)
(0) rationale
Java Data Objects (JDO) is being proposed as a sub-project within
the DB top-level project.
JDO is an interface-based domain-object-to-database programming
t otherwise restrict what you can do with the code.
Regards,
Craig
On Dec 7, 2004, at 9:19 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 08 December 2004 00:47, Craig Russell wrote:
The DB project voted to adopt JDO last week-end, and they suggested I
contact you to set up the resources for the project.
ditional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
ld
be done.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Cool!
On Jan 4, 2005, at 6:13 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Jan 4, 2005, at 9:07 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
Hi Noel, Geir,
So the JDO mailing lists are done and the JIRA has been set up.
What's left for JDO I think are a Wiki and an svn repository. After
the repository is done we will ne
ECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
ode: indented-text
# tab-width: 4
# indent-tabs-mode: nil
# tab-stop-list: (4 6 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68
72 76 80)
# End:
#
-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EM
]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description
slowly changing them).
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mai
Hi Noel,
On May 29, 2005, at 1:26 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Craig Russell wrote:
Google "Apache JDO" and you get a hit for Apache OJB. You would never
guess that we're building the API and TCK for JDO 2.0 here.
Apache JDO has a sponsor, committers, a repository, a JIRA,
m.The API sub-project has been synchronized with the latest version of the specification. The TCK sub-project is about 80% complete. Still lacks full testing for O/R mapping and detached objects.The Apache JDO web site is now active at http://incubator.apache.org/jdoCraig Craig Russell Architect, Sun
ail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/prod
Hi,Thanks for the useful feedback.The dotted notation is news to me but makes a lot of sense. I'll study the reading materials and ask questions if it's too hard to suss out.On Aug 5, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Brett Porter wrote:On 8/6/05, Craig Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It'
rter wrote:On 8/6/05, Craig Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It'd be great if you can put them up at cvs.apache.org, maybe under agroup of org.apache.incubator.jdo? I don't understand what this means. I don't know how, or don't haveprivileges to, publish anything
Hi Brett,On Aug 6, 2005, at 7:27 PM, Brett Porter wrote:On 8/7/05, Craig Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Brett,I looked at ibiblio and found some "official-looking" jars checked in. Itseems that we might use javax.jdo as the group name for the jdo2.jar (thisis the official
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Descript
I agree that an incubating release does not need to be fully compliant with the
proscription against mandatory LGPL dependencies for Apache releases.
Clearly the podling is well aware of the need to replace the LGPL dependency
before graduation. And I agree with Greg that a podling learning the
A software grant can only grant rights that are owned by the grantor.
If there was a(n innocent) mistake in the file referenced by the grant, no big
deal IMHO.
Clearly, bundled dependencies cannot be included in a grant since the grantor
has no rights to them. The fact that they were included i
As I understand it, LICENSE is for licenses. Period. If advertising is
required, the NOTICE file is used.
If there are third party works included in a distribution that use the same
Apache 2.0 license as any Apache components, the license file already contains
the appropriate license.
Section
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Steve Varnau wrote:
>
>> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>> Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 1:09 PM
>> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF
>>
>> On 3/7/16, 12:26 PM, "
There is a sorta technical reason for the Champion to be a member of the PMC of
the sponsor.
I’d expect the Champion to subscribe to the private@ list and to have binding
votes on podling releases. These both require PMC membership.
The alternative is to create two different “exceptions” that
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 11:25 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:19 PM Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Craig Russell
>> wrote:
>>> There is a sorta technical reason for the Champion to be a mem
+1 for graduation (binding)
I don’t see any value in keeping Johnzon in incubation.
The project seems to be ticking along, with several releases, frequent commits,
and a low excitement but active community.
Craig
> On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote:
>
> The Apache Johnzon commu
I found Jim’s message from February 24 in which he says that for one release,
he’s ok with having the LGPL dependency.
Given that substantial progress has been made and continues to be made on
getting the dependency relicensed, I expect that asking for permission for
another release in the incu
Sounds interesting. Sign me up to mentor.
Craig
> On Jun 16, 2016, at 9:52 AM, James Bognar wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose Juneau to be an Apache Incubator project.
>
> Juneau is a toolkit for marshalling POJOs to a wide variety of content
> types using a common framework, and for
It would be good to update the proposal with relevant links.
Craig
> On Jun 16, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: James Bognar [mailto:james.bog...@salesforce.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 12:51
>> To: general@incubator.apache.
+1 (binding)
Craig
> On Jun 21, 2016, at 10:10 AM, James Bognar
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> It looks like the discussion thread has died down so I am now calling a
> vote on accepting Juneau into the Apache Incubator.
>
> For those who are interested the DISCUSS thread can be found at
> https:/
Hi John,
Given the state of Apache documented processes, I think it was perfectly fine
to close this vote with a RESULT. I was not confused after reading
>>> We will correct the noted problems and submit a 0.8.1-RC4.
Recognizing that this document is (still!) in draft status
http://incubator.
e
arrows fly!
And the comdev pages could also be similarly improved, for anyone who has an
interest.
Craig
> John
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Craig Russell
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> Given the stat
> On Aug 1, 2016, at 2:22 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:21 PM Christopher wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:50 PM John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:29 AM Keith Turner wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 9:36 AM, John D. Ament
wrote:
Hi Christopher,
> On Aug 1, 2016, at 3:00 PM, Christopher wrote:
>
> Why would this be a concern for http://fluo.io, but not sites like
> http://www.stratahadoopworld.com/ or http://accumulosummit.com/ which are
> related to the ASF project, but clearly not owned or controlled by ASF? Or
> even
> On Aug 3, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Christopher wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 9:14 AM Vice President, Brand Management <
> vp-br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> In particular, using another third party's potential branding mis-use to
>> justify your desired uses of an Apache brand is a danger sig
Incubating artifacts (6.1)
>> - 2. Continue to build the Joshua PPMC and user community
>> - 3. Investigate targeted user communities within Apache
>> -
>> - Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
>> - aware of?
>> -
>> -
I also got confused by this part of the podling status page.
Perhaps we can fix this by changing the wording:
>> > members>
>> If the project website and code repository are not yet set up, use the
>> following table:
I’m not sure about the utility of verifying the current state of the podling.
In the JDO project, we have detailed build/release instructions, yet after
several years, every time we put out a release, there is something different. I
think it’s the nature of software, not only because the project changes ever so
slightly but the dependencies also change underneath you. So
Hi Taylor,
My advice is to simply get ICLAs for all past, present, and future contributors
to the project. That will cover Apache’s requirements.
If you have people who for whatever reason won’t sign the ICLA, perhaps you can
bring their concerns back here.
Regards,
Criag
> On Sep 14, 2016,
Hi Geertjan,
You have already noticed that at Apache we don’t all speak with one voice. Even
those who have literally been here for years may appear to disagree on the
details, while I expect most agree on the broad strokes.
Kudos for taking all the advice and proposing a plan to move this prop
> On Sep 27, 2016, at 1:30 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
>
> This vote will run for at least 72 hours. Please VOTE as follows
> [X] +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do not accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator because ...
Craig L Russell
c...@apache.org
--
Hi Phil,
> On Oct 5, 2016, at 9:51 AM, Phil Sorber wrote:
>
> So we now have CCLA's on file from all contributing corps as well as ICLA's
> from all individual contributors. Have we satisfied the requirements to make
> a release from the incubator or are there still additional steps like an I
I could not find Julien Enselme as an initial committer on the NetBeans
proposal.
Craig
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 5:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Julien Enselme wrote:
>> ...From what I understand here, my account should have been
>> created..
> On Oct 29, 2016, at 1:54 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 4:51 PM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> -1 due to the kinesis library issue.
>>
>> Can you provide a bit more detail on what the objection is with the
>> kinesis library? Given it's optional and not being
> On Oct 30, 2016, at 6:03 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:53 PM Craig Russell
> wrote:
>
>>
>>> On Oct 29, 2016, at 1:54 PM, John D. Ament
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 4:51 PM Justin Mclean
>
er, there is already a JIRA for what appears to be relevant to this
issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-198#
Folks on legal-discuss can tune into that discussion, and may not be looking at
the Beam vote thread.
Craig
>
> On Oct 30, 2016 10:50, "Craig Russell" wrot
Hi Eric,
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 9:30 AM, Eric Friedrich wrote:
>
> Many of the release guidelines mention a license audit of the released
> source files.
>
> Are there any particular requirements as to how this audit is performed?
No. The requirement is that all files be examined to determine if
Is it me or is this link broken?
Thanks,
Craig
Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional co
I’m unable to find the proposal at
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals
Is it me or is the proposal not included on that page?
Thanks,
Craig
> On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> This vote passes with 10 binding +1's, 3 non-binding +1, and no -1's
>
> Binding:
>
Hi Niclas,
> On Nov 29, 2016, at 8:04 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
> I am seeing on
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-import-code-dump
> that the CCLA is adequate for new codebases coming in via the Incubator. Is
> that really the case? It seems to me to be a rather 'weak'
Hi Niclas,
The CCLA is sufficient as a code grant for new code bases coming into Apache.
Of course, committers must submit their own ICLA as well.
Why do you consider the CCLA a ‘weak’ agreement?
Craig
> On Nov 29, 2016, at 8:04 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
> I am seeing on
> http://incubator
My advice: Drop the -incubating. Vote on your dev@ list. The incubator is done
with you. ;-)
Craig
> On Dec 22, 2016, at 8:06 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Valid point.
>
> It means that we can proceed with 0.4.0-incubating release (without IPMC
> vote). Agree ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On Dec 29, 2016, at 6:30 PM, James Bognar wrote:
>
> Yea...that's my cat.
>
> I thought I did sign it with an Apache email address. I'll recheck that.
It should be possible for you to add your apache email address to your key. And
then re-up-load the key with the additional email address.
9ec39fa78c31b39c83a6fea29eb34fada0ee070413@1222432864@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> [4]:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release-java.html#best-practice-maven
> [5]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution.html#channels
Craig Russell
papa...@gmail.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi Hen,
To make it easier for secretary to request new accounts, can you post the
proposal to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals
Thanks,
Craig
> On Jan 23, 2017, at 9:19 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> Vote is closed and successful.
>
> 7 binding +1 votes.
>
> Henry Saputra
Hi Olivier,
Can you also post the link to this proposal on
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals ?
Thanks,
Craig
> On Feb 16, 2017, at 9:33 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Gobblin" for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator.
Excellent proposal.
+1 (binding)
Craig
> On Feb 16, 2017, at 9:33 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
> I would like to call a vote for accepting "Gobblin" for incubation in the
> Apache Incubator.
> The full proposal is available below, and is also available in the wiki:
> https://wik
Hi Hen,
At the bottom of the PPMC list is a big bold “+”. If you click on that, you can
add apache ids to the PPMC.
HTH,
Craig
> On Feb 20, 2017, at 11:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> When I look at https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/mxnet - I only see the
> mentors for the project listed
Hi,
Sounds like the easiest way to handle this is as you described.
Get a CCLA from Kenshoo with https://github.com/kenshoo/freemarker-online
describing the code being contributed
Add any current Kenshoo employees
Get an ICLA from non-Kenshoo folks
Create a git repo for the new content
After
Hi Daniel,
> On Feb 22, 2017, at 9:24 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
>
> Wednesday, February 22, 2017, 8:12:32 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sounds like the easiest way to handle this is as you described.
>
> If we can do that, that's great! I
> On Feb 23, 2017, at 6:23 AM, James Bognar wrote:
>
> Thanks Stian,
>
> Bugs opened for the NOTICE file, port conflict issue, and failing
> testcase. I thought we shook out all the timezone-related testcase
> failures on the last release, but I'll revisit.
>
> For the copyright, isn't the no
+1
Craig
> On Feb 22, 2017, at 9:05 AM, James Bognar wrote:
>
> The Apache Juneau Incubator PPMC has voted *+3* to release Apache Juneau
> 6.1.0-incubating RC2.
>
>
> This vote carries over *+2* binding votes from IPMC mentors:
>
> Steve Blackmon: +1
>
> John D Ament: +1
>
> Incubator PMC
+1
looks like a good solution to a sticky problem.
Craig
> On Mar 11, 2017, at 9:31 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> Log4cxx was originally a sub-project of the Logging Services. In 2013 several
> users became frustrated that they were submitting patches but there were no
> committers who could a
Hi James,
There was a pretty extensive discussion on the netbeans dev list. I’d encourage
you to review this thread
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2dce365d03334c82d31b12c8b3dcad1a925a2f71af75658b8d8a5a07@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E
You can get all of the messages in the thread by doing
Hi Ed,
What Nick said.
If you're still having trouble resetting your password at id.apache.org, the
reset information is sent to your email address eesp...@gmail.com
Regards,
Craig
> On Mar 31, 2017, at 2:21 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Ed Espino wrote:
>> Thanks for your
I also must vote -1 on this release.
clr% find . -name "*.jar"
./android/playground/gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jar
./android/sdk/gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jar
./android/sdk/license/license-gradle-plugin-0.12.1.jar
./android/sdk/license/maven-license-plugin-1.10.b1.jar
./android/sdk/license/
I'm going to call foul on this one.
If you cannot be civil, then leave the discussion to others.
Craig
> On May 3, 2017, at 7:24 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
> BUT ALSO figuring out what to start looking for. For fak sake,
> man Get a grip on reality!
Craig L Russell
Secretary, Apache Sof
nclear if we left it out, as some people on this very list pushed for on a
> previous RC.
>
> So, yes, I get pissed off as well. The incubator over time is getting more
> and more intolerant at podling's first release, and I think it is the wrong
> way to go. It is disheartening..
release, we can resolve them with "JIRA filed for next release".
>
> The only potential issues I see as legal impacting are the binaries and the
> com.google source code.
>
> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 9:23 PM Craig Russell wrote:
>
>> I also must vote -1 on this rel
> On May 6, 2017, at 10:04 AM, Craig Russell wrote:
>
>>> 3. The java source files in android/commons/src are still in the
>>> com.alibaba name space. Assuming that these are actually weex source files,
>>> they must be repackaged to org.apache.
>>>
I've seen a few (recent) incubator votes that imply that there are two
separate, distinct votes: one in the podling and one in the incubator general.
And lots of questions about binding votes and carried-over votes and whose
votes are counted.
I'd like to suggest:
There is one vote for a podli
e second phase?
No. The usual rules apply to the first phase. More positive than negative
votes. At least three PPMC members must cast votes in order to go to the second
phase.
Craig
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Craig Russell wrote:
>
>> I've seen a few (rec
In case anyone asks, I updated the licenses page
http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas to start using the new cla-corporate.pdf
http://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.pdf instead of the old
cla-corporate.txt.
The pdf version should be much easier to use and does not require users to
refor
> On May 20, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> Dumb question time.
I don't think the question is dumb.
>
> Should we encourage that @apache.org addresses are used when subscribing to
> a private PMC list; and if not all PMC members have subscribed on a
> podling, can one subscribe the
> On May 20, 2017, at 4:54 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
>
>
>> On May 20, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>> Dumb question time.
>
> I don't think the question is dumb.
>>
>> Should we encourage that @apache.org addresses are used whe
Hi John,
I don't know all of the details of the code, but this is in regard to
GridGain's grant via SGA of a persistent store system which is a substantial
body of code not developed at Apache. So IMHO it is appropriate for the code
grant to be reviewed.
I don't see any issues except it's diff
> On May 21, 2017, at 2:02 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 4:54 PM Craig Russell wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> I don't know all of the details of the code, but this is in regard to
>> GridGain's grant via SGA of a persistent
Let's all read the documentation on IP Clearance so we have a common basis for
discussion.
Craig
> On May 21, 2017, at 2:46 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 21, 2017, at 2:02 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 4:54 PM Cr
> Niclas
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Craig Russell wrote:
>
>> Let's all read the documentation on IP Clearance so we have a common basis
>> for discussion.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>> On May 21, 2017, at 2:46 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
>
Hi Denis,
Everything looks to be in order. Good luck.
Craig
> On May 22, 2017, at 1:28 PM, Denis Mag wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I've just followed well-described and clear "Process" section from this
> page:
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html
>
> Following 3. Gr
+1
Checked .asc signature
Signing keys in KEYS file and in pgpkeys.mit.edu
Checked LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER
Sampled source files include license
Good luck.
Craig
> On May 15, 2017, at 2:23 AM, sospartan wrote:
>
> Hi IPMC,
>
> I'm calling a vote for Weex-incubating 0.12.0-RC4 release.
>
Hi sospartan,
> On May 24, 2017, at 8:58 PM, sospartan wrote:
>
> Is this release have enough +1 bindings now?
> I count rapheal, craig and john ~~ that's 3 of them. I shall prepare some
> fireworks for this.
Fireworks are deserved. Is there a weex app for that? :)
Craig
>
> On Thu, May 25,
> On May 25, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Denis Magda wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> 72 hours have passed but nobody voted. Does it mean that the vote can be
> closed saying that nobody is against the donation?
Yes.
Craig
>
> —
> Denis
>
>> On May 23, 2017, at 5:30 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, M
Hi James,
Everything that is not explicitly called out in the top level NOTICE and
LICENSE files are licensed under the Apache 2.0 license.
Adding a file to this directory might mislead people into thinking that they
need to perform more due diligence with other files in other directories.
My
+1
Craig
> On Jun 18, 2017, at 9:30 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> All,
>
> This is a call to vote to retire the Blur podling. Blur has been
> incubating for nearly 5 years and has not grown a community. It is
> mutually felt that it is time to retire Blur. There was a successful vote
> on th
Hi James,
Instead of including "Copyright (c) 2001, Apache Foobar Foundation" in the
sample code, would it be possible/easy to "assume the copyright notice is in a
file and include the file contents here".
That is probably how you would want to do it anyway, considering the task of
updating c
quot;Copyright (c) ..."?
My understanding of the problem is that RAT reports that there is a copyright
notice in the code.
Craig
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
>
>> Hi James,
>>
>> Instead of including "Copyright (c) 2001, Apache F
Hi,
> On Jul 14, 2017, at 3:28 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> All,
>
> For podlings so far, its been easy to decide how to retire them. They've
> had releases and/or naming completed so we keep the source code around.
>
> HORN has neither a release nor naming.
>
> Should we delete the source r
+1 to release.
Craig
checked NOTICE, LICENSE
checked .asc and .md5 sigs and checksums
built from top level with no errors
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 10:33 AM, Suneel Marthi wrote:
>
> +1 binding
>
> 1. checked NOTICE, License
> 2. Verified sigs and hashes
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:31 PM, J
Hi,
I've got some updates for the ip-clearance page and I'd like to publish them.
I started by fixing
https://github.com/apache/incubator/blob/master/pages/guides/ip_clearance.ad
where the metadata is rendered as text.
But git gives me an error. How do I fix this?
Thanks,
Craig
clr% git c
. Give it a shot, and
> provide feedback of course :-)
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:24 PM Craig Russell wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've got some updates for the ip-clearance page and I'd like to publish
>> them.
>>
>> I started by fixing
Can anyone here tell me what the life cycle is for ip-clearance?
The guidelines at https://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html say that
ip-clearance is maintained in svn.
The web page has a typo: https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
(search for "concensus")
So I corrected
r the
> nightly build.
>
> John
>
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 6:52 PM Craig Russell wrote:
>
>> Can anyone here tell me what the life cycle is for ip-clearance?
>>
>> The guidelines at https://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html say
>> that ip-clearance
; content around how TLPs request IP Clearance into guides/ip_clearance.ad ?
>
> John
>
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 7:14 PM Craig Russell wrote:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Thanks for clarifying.
>>
>> I would like to confirm that ip-clearance web site is gen
cense-faq.html#PatentScope and
http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas and
http://www.apache.org/licenses/#submitting
Craig
> On Aug 6, 2017, at 5:30 PM, Craig Russell wrote:
>
> My idea is to put all of the common stuff into one document and have the
> others refer to it. Then if we ne
+1
Craig
> On Aug 14, 2017, at 5:50 AM, Fegaras, Leonidas wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> After a discussion on the dev@mrql list [1], the MRQL community has
> voted to retire the project [2]. I am now calling for a followup vote
> on IPMC to confirm the decision to retire MRQL.
> MRQL is incubating for m
Hi Henri,
If a project was developed outside Apache then everyone who contributed to the
project has to have an ICLA on file or file a Software Grant as part of IP
Clearance.
It's not sufficient that the code has always been under the ASL 2.0.
Are there any contributors to the project before
It looks like the request to vote on the release by the Incubator PMC was made
on Friday August 25.
This vote has been open more than 72 hours after the [VOTE] thread was opened.
So it looks like you are good to release.
Regards,
Craig
> On Aug 30, 2017, at 11:16 AM, Dominic Divakaruni
> w
-1 for an overly broad restriction that needs a bit of discretion.
The situation that caused this issue to be raised is that a grant was made of a
specific set of files contained in a .zip archive. That set of files contained
no non-donated IP. The issue is that the grant had a list of excluded
It might be useful to discuss under what terms we are considering incorporating
this code.
http://www.apache.org/licenses/#provenance describes three types of code. If we
are preserving the original (alv2) license and copyright it's ok to
redistribute it with the original headers.
But if we ar
Hi Andreas,
> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:17 PM, Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote:
>
> Am 25.09.2017 um 03:07 schrieb Craig Russell:
>> It might be useful to discuss under what terms we are considering
>> incorporating this code.
>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/#provenance de
Hi Andreas,
> On Sep 25, 2017, at 9:37 AM, Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote:
>
> Am 25.09.2017 um 17:42 schrieb Craig Russell:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:17 PM, Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 25.09.2017 um 03:07 schrieb Craig Russell
> On Sep 25, 2017, at 8:55 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> Hi Craig,
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:42 AM Craig Russell wrote:
>
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:17 PM, Andreas Lehmkuehler
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
1 - 100 of 380 matches
Mail list logo
