Hi all guys,
I would like to propose Syncope, an Open Source system for managing
identities in enterprise environments, implemented in JEE technology,
originally developed by Tirasa, an Italian IT company, to be an Apache
Incubator project.
The goal for Syncope is to become the reference implement
On 1/31/12 3:06 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message -
From: William A. Rowe Jr.
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 9:01 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes
On 1/30/2012 7:51 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Mess
I missed antelders +1 vote and only noticed this today via this link:
http://old.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-MRUnit-version-0.8.0-incubating-td33113645.html
As such, the vote passes with:
4 +1 Patrick Hunt, Chrs M, antelder, Brock Noland
0 -1
Patrick Hunt, Chrs M, antelder are all members of
On 31 January 2012 00:06, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
> lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
> authority over personnel matters makes little sense on this
> PMC. Therefore I propose we adopt the policy that personnel
> votes
Hi Simo!
Sounds like a really nice project.
But I wonder if there is some overlap with the Apache Shiro project [1]?
LieGrue,
strub
[1] http://shiro.apache.org/
- Original Message -
> From: Simone Tripodi
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> On 31 January 2012 00:06, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
>> lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
>> authority over personnel matters makes little sense on this
>> PMC. T
On 31/01/2012 11:08, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi Simo!
>
> Sounds like a really nice project.
Hi Mark,
first of all, thanks.
> But I wonder if there is some overlap with the Apache Shiro project [1]?
> [1] http://shiro.apache.org/
" Apache Shiro is a powerful and easy-to-use Java security framewor
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> On 31 January 2012 00:06, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
>> lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
>> authority over personnel matters makes little sense on this
>> PMC. T
On 1/31/12 11:08 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Simo!
Sounds like a really nice project.
Sounds nice, yes.
But I wonder if there is some overlap with the Apache Shiro project [1]?
IMO, Syncope spectra is wider than Shiro. Actually, Syncope *could* use
Shiro.
I have a Q : Can't it be a bit
Hi Francesco and Simo,
it looks interesting.
As an Identity Manager, I wonder if we can't extend it to OSGi, in
addition of JEE.
Regards
JB
On 01/31/2012 11:17 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 31/01/2012 11:08, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Simo!
Sounds like a really nice project.
Hi Mark
On 31/01/2012 11:31, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> On 1/31/12 11:08 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>> Hi Simo!
>>
>> Sounds like a really nice project.
>
> Sounds nice, yes.
>>
>> But I wonder if there is some overlap with the Apache Shiro project [1]?
>
> IMO, Syncope spectra is wider than Shiro. Actually,
Salut Jean-Baptiste,
why not? :) Feel free to add yourself in the proposal if you like it!!! :)
A trés bientot,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Jean-B
On 31/01/2012 11:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Francesco and Simo,
>
> it looks interesting.
>
> As an Identity Manager, I wonder if we can't extend it to OSGi, in
> addition of JEE.
Hi,
I must admit that I am not very deep in OSGi stuff, but there shouldn't
be nothing against making Syncop
On 1/31/12 11:44 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 31/01/2012 11:31, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On 1/31/12 11:08 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Simo!
Sounds like a really nice project.
Sounds nice, yes.
But I wonder if there is some overlap with the Apache Shiro project [1]?
IMO, Syncope spec
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> Great, thanks. Using this method, I get a file layout similar to:
> giraph-0.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
> NOTICE (without appended text for dep1 and dep2)
> LICENSE (without appended text for dep1 and dep2)
> bin/
> lib/
On 31 January 2012 11:07, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Jakob Homan wrote:
>> Great, thanks. Using this method, I get a file layout similar to:
>> giraph-0.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>> NOTICE (without appended text for dep1 and dep2)
>> LICENSE (without
On 10/7/11 10:11 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Any more questions/comments about this proposal? If not, I suggest we
start the vote tomorrow.
I think we're good. The one thing I'd like to do is asking to add
another committer to the ros
On 10/7/11 10:11 PM, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Any more questions/comments about this proposal? If not, I suggest we
start the vote tomorrow.
I think we're good. The one thing I'd like to do is asking to add
another committer to the ros
Hi Guys,
On Jan 31, 2012, at 1:17 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>>
>> Oh, so you want a supermajority in terms of those who have voted, not in
>> terms of the membership of the IPMC? Not unreasonable. Let's see what
>> others think.
>
> I would easily +1 a proposal with a 3/4 majority of the *
On 01/30/2012 11:32 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
I spent a few moments reviewing the November reports and related
information of all the projects scheduled to
On 1/30/2012 6:06 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> It is clear that with all the turmoil of late and people
> lightly tossing around -1's that the notion of having veto
> authority over personnel matters makes little sense on this
> PMC. Therefore I propose we adopt the policy that personnel
> votes are
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Any other rational opinions?
I don't recall a case where a candidate was not elected because of an
unnecessarily strict -1. All I'm seeing now is abstract discussion
about hypothetical votes and a lot of hot air.
I'd go for a policy vot
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:58, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 1:17 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>> Oh, so you want a supermajority in terms of those who have voted, not in
>>> terms of the membership of the IPMC? Not unreasonable. Let's see what
>>> othe
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Forget about my last mail. I missed the rename to Callback...
No worries, the project has been quick to change names. :-) Hopefully
Cordova will stand the test of time.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
--
- Original Message -
> From: William A. Rowe Jr.
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Joe Schaefer
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes
>
> On 1/30/2012 6:06 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> It is clear that with all the
There are currently 29 outstanding no votes made on
a discussion thread merely for the fact that those
candidates names were listed. Are you not reading
private@incubator?
There is currently a -1 on a current vote thread there
as well.
- Original Message -
> From: Jukka Zitting
> To
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:18, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> Any other rational opinions?
>
> I don't recall a case where a candidate was not elected because of an
> unnecessarily strict -1. All I'm seeing now is abstract discussion
> about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin closed PODLINGNAMESEARCH-4.
-
Resolution: Fixed
There is little evidence that Creadur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Burrell Donkin closed PODLINGNAMESEARCH-1.
-
Resolution: Fixed
The consensus reached is that though A
On 1/31/2012 11:38 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> Plainly wrong: It has been repeatedly established (even by the Chair)
> that policy decisions here are not subject to veto. This is one of those
> times.
> Furthermore the documentation [1] clearly points out that procedural issues
> are to be deci
On 1/31/2012 11:12 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> I'm a little unclear on wrowe's original message talking about
> "supermajority" and whether that was for *addition* or for *removal*.
> I'm assuming that it was only about addition because I've never seen
> any PMC-based ejection of a PMC member. The B
> Instead, since you are including dep1 and dep2 inside
>giraph-bin.tar.gz, they should be covered by the NOTICE/LICENSE pair
> of the tarball.
This is the case for Giraph (and Kafka and other projects that bring
in transitive dependencies into the tar.gz via maven), so the
jackrabbit approach won'
- Original Message -
> From: William A. Rowe Jr.
> To: Joe Schaefer
> Cc: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes
>
> On 1/31/2012 11:38 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>
>> Plainly wrong: It has
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
> in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
>
Sure, but there isn't even a February page at the wiki :
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> Any other rational opinions?
>
> I don't recall a case where a candidate was not elected because of an
> unnecessarily strict -1. All I'm seeing now is abstract discussion
> abo
Greg Stein wrote on Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:12:50 -0500:
> In that light, we're talking about "what kinds of voting results
> should be forwarded by the Chair?" If the Chair sends a request to the
> Board to add somebody and reports "5 +1 votes, 2 -1 votes"... would
> that be sufficient? 2/3rds or
Hi Luciano,
The February page is here: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012
Best,
Daniel
On 31 January 2012 19:17, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
>
On 31 Jan 2012, at 18:17, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Jukka Zitting
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The deadline for podlings to submit their February reports is already
>> in two days since the ASF board meeting is scheduled for Feb 15th.
>>
>
> Sure, but there isn't even
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:20, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:12:50 -0500:
>> In that light, we're talking about "what kinds of voting results
>> should be forwarded by the Chair?" If the Chair sends a request to the
>> Board to add somebody and reports "5 +1 vo
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> There are currently 29 outstanding no votes made on
> a discussion thread merely for the fact that those
> candidates names were listed.
I count those as votes once I see them in an actual VOTE thread. We've
had similar VOTEs earlier, th
On 01/30/2012 05:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I've never liked vetoes for this. One person can hold an entire PMC hostage
> simply for disliking someone (or worse: subtle corporate concerns masked
> otherwise). People have said in the past, "you should have veto so you're
> not forced to work with so
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 05:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> I've never liked vetoes for this. One person can hold an entire PMC hostage
>> simply for disliking someone (or worse: subtle corporate concerns masked
>> otherwise). People have said in the past, "
On Jan 31, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 05:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> I've never liked vetoes for this. One person can hold an entire PMC hostage
>> simply for disliking someone (or worse: subtle corporate concerns masked
>> otherwise). People have said in the past, "you
Proposal looks good.
Niall
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
>
> I would like to propose Syncope, an Open Source system for managing
> identities in enterprise environments, implemented in JEE technology,
> originally developed by Tirasa, an Italian IT compan
On 1/31/2012 3:28 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
> Having said that, I should note that the context of Incubator is
> significantly different than a normal PMC. If incubator wants to structure
> itself more like a board and less like a project, I really don't have
> much to say against that. Note
Hi Roy,
On Jan 31, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
>
>> On 01/30/2012 05:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> I've never liked vetoes for this. One person can hold an entire PMC hostage
>>> simply for disliking someone (or worse: subtle corpor
On 1/31/2012 5:05 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>
> In replacement, I propose the following concrete actions:
>
> 1. Move the Incubator process/policy/documentation, etc., to ComDev - I
> agree with gstein on this. I think it could be maintained by the ASF community
> folks there, and upda
May I suggest bumping thoughts of cashiering the incubator to its own
thread? It seems a much bigger question than whether to prevent
vetoes on PPMC membership votes.
Don
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:21 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 1/31/2012 5:05 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>>
>> In
Hi,
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2011?action=diff&rev1=55&rev2=56
Or is someone just confused?
For comparison: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/bluesky.html
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi Simo!
>
> Sounds like a really nice project.
>
> But I wonder if there is some overlap with the Apache Shiro project [1]?
>
>
They're not the same as some have pointed out yet even if they were there's
nothing wrong with having overlappi
Dear Proposed Syncope mentors:
Please post messages on this thread indicating your prior experience
as mentors, if any, and your willing to remain in place as active
mentors for at least a year.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Mark Strube
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2011?action=diff&rev1=55&rev2=56
>
> Or is someone just confused?
It's me who's confused. We're in 2012 already... :-)
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---
On 31 January 2012 18:15, Jakob Homan wrote:
>> Instead, since you are including dep1 and dep2 inside
>>giraph-bin.tar.gz, they should be covered by the NOTICE/LICENSE pair
>> of the tarball.
> This is the case for Giraph (and Kafka and other projects that bring
> in transitive dependencies into t
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> Did I miss the reminder? Or is it not working?
I suppose the reminder will go out tomorrow on the first day of the
month. I guess that's not too helpful given that the deadline is also
tomorrow.
>>> Droids
>>
>> Any progress on getti
Hi,
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2012?action=diff&rev1=17&rev2=18
Perhaps a bit verbose to some tastes, but this contains all the
information an external observer needs to get a good picture of the
project status. Great level of introspection combined with ability
identify concrete ac
55 matches
Mail list logo
