There are currently 29 outstanding no votes made on a discussion thread merely for the fact that those candidates names were listed. Are you not reading private@incubator?
There is currently a -1 on a current vote thread there as well. ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> > To: general <general@incubator.apache.org> > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:18 PM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] eliminate vetoes on personnel votes > > Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> > wrote: >> Any other rational opinions? > > I don't recall a case where a candidate was not elected because of an > unnecessarily strict -1. All I'm seeing now is abstract discussion > about hypothetical votes and a lot of hot air. > > I'd go for a policy vote only once there's a concrete case (i.e. a > failed vote) where progress is being obstructed by reasons that the > majority finds unreasonable. > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
