On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Any other rational opinions?
>
> I don't recall a case where a candidate was not elected because of an
> unnecessarily strict -1. All I'm seeing now is abstract discussion
> about hypothetical votes and a lot of hot air.
>
> I'd go for a policy vote only once there's a concrete case (i.e. a
> failed vote) where progress is being obstructed by reasons that the
> majority finds unreasonable.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting

+1 to that.

I'd really like this flood of emails to stop, i've not read many since
last week, can't you all take a break? If some policy is being changed
can't it wait a few weeks till a quieter time so it really getting the
proper attention of PMC members?

   ...ant



   ...ant

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to