On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> IPMC, on the other hand, feels different since, practically speaking, the
> accumulation of the kind of merit IPMC cares for require *some* level
> of IPMC karma already.
There is an open question currently lingering on general@incubator
On 16 October 2012 16:31, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>> My point is only that I'd prefer to give Roman, and people like him, a
>> +1 on the IPMC (assuming people vouch for him) than have someone else
>> voting +1 on a release without doing app
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> My point is only that I'd prefer to give Roman, and people like him, a
> +1 on the IPMC (assuming people vouch for him) than have someone else
> voting +1 on a release without doing appropriate due diligence.
If that's the easiest practical r
> My point is only that I'd prefer to give Roman, and people like him, a
> +1 on the IPMC (assuming people vouch for him) than have someone else
> voting +1 on a release without doing appropriate due diligence.
I certainly agree with this.
>
> Ross
>
> ---
On 15 October 2012 12:29, Benson Margulies wrote:
> This whole thread was launched, if I read Ross' remark correctly, by
> my doing something stupid. I've apologized. It's not at all clear to
> me that my mistake is example of a common kind of stupidity.
Nope. My position is not prompted by any i
This whole thread was launched, if I read Ross' remark correctly, by
my doing something stupid. I've apologized. It's not at all clear to
me that my mistake is example of a common kind of stupidity.
I perceive, however, an ambiguity. The phrase 'proper IP
verification,' more or less, has echoed do
I dont disapprove of what you call "freelance votes". I disapprove of votes
not backed by proper review efforts.
Other than that I agree with all you say.
Sent from mobile, forgive terseness and errors
On Oct 15, 2012 3:43 AM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Ross Ga
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> On Oct 13, 2012 2:59 AM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
>> That the Incubator's release process would grind to a halt without
>> "freelance" IPMC votes exposes a systemic flaw.
>
> Also agreed. I think Jukka's release taskforce idea is a good way
Sent from my tablet
On Oct 13, 2012 2:59 AM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
> > Nobody, in my opinion, sh8old be voting on a release without having
> > conducted the appropriate verifications themselves.
>
> -0
>
> I agree -- but that's not goi
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> Nobody, in my opinion, sh8old be voting on a release without having
> conducted the appropriate verifications themselves.
-0
I agree -- but that's not going far enough.
In my view, no one should vote on a release unless they're subscribed t
Sent from my tablet
On Oct 11, 2012 8:01 PM, "Marvin Humphrey" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > However, see my 'how would it help to clear 3 +1 IPMC votes hurdle'
question
> > on this thread'?
>
> If you help to audit the IP of the podling and to instill g
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Jakob Homan wrote:
>> You go and help the community out in general and, when it comes time
>> for a release, you do all the things a regular mentor would do. If
>> you catch issues with the release, this
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> However, see my 'how would it help to clear 3 +1 IPMC votes hurdle' question
> on this thread'?
If you help to audit the IP of the podling and to instill good habits and
values, it will make it considerably easier for the formal Mentors
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> You go and help the community out in general and, when it comes time
> for a release, you do all the things a regular mentor would do. If
> you catch issues with the release, this will be a big help. No one is
> going to ignore your assistan
> Great. Lets make it practical -- there's a Helix project that is currently
> being proposed for incubation. I'm very much interested in helping
> it to grow into a TLP eventually. Given how closely it aligns with some
> of the things we're trying to do in Bigtop -- I'm definitely joining the
> co
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> I guess I would encourage you to do as Luciano suggests, and to chat to
> mentors on a project that you might help with.
Great. Lets make it practical -- there's a Helix project that is currently
being proposed for incubation. I'm very much inte
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> But great suggestion Luciano (to use all the incumbent IPMC to help more
> while experiences are fresh).
> My personal opinion is, the easiest way to look for projects needing help is
> during releases. If a project
> comes to general list w
On Oct 11, 2012, at 4:32 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> There's that, and also the fact that no two mentors have the same level
> of experience anyway, so what you describe is possible within the
> current structures, just isn't formalized.
I am not sure if formalizing the role is neded. I agree with Up
There's that, and also the fact that no two mentors have the same level
of experience anyway, so what you describe is possible within the
current structures, just isn't formalised.
I guess I would encourage you to do as Luciano suggests, and to chat to
mentors on a project that you might help with
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> ever since Bigtop has incubated I've been thinking
> about the experience that I've had and that it would
> be very nice if I could help the new projects at least
> 1/10th the amount of help I received from some of the
> mentors.
>
Hi!
ever since Bigtop has incubated I've been thinking
about the experience that I've had and that it would
be very nice if I could help the new projects at least
1/10th the amount of help I received from some of the
mentors.
Also, seeing a steady stream of graduating projects
I would imagine tha
21 matches
Mail list logo
