Re: Incubation of iBATIS Data Mapper

On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Ted Husted wrote: if [...] overseeing a DB product with non-Java implementations is not an issue There is nothing Java specific about the Apache DB charter, indeed the DB proposal specicially calls out a language-agnostic approach.

Re: DB PMC has voted to sponsor Derby

I suspect HTML attachments are being trimmed, as I didn't see any attachments to Ken's message either. Here's the text of the proposal, as submitted to the DB PMC list on 23 July 2004. If someone can get the HTML form to the list, feel free. Proposal for Derby: an Apache Database Sub-Proj

status update for axion

Morgan happens to be off-line currently, but I'll fill in the basic status for him: * The Axion development team has (lazily) approved to sign the software grant. The comment period on this has expired. The grant should be signed and faxed this week. * A request has been made to infrastruct

RE: software grant questions

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote: You're right. I'l make sure that CVS is tarballed and xferred to minotaur. I assume we're dropping it in incubator? Yes, but wait for Rodney to tell you to pull the trigger. Please hold off for now. It would be convienient to wrap up some loose ends a

RE: software grant questions

On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote: 1) What form should this enumeration take? Something like "the Axion DB software, documentation and other files developed by the Axion Development Team at tigris.org" seems about right. Ok. Would a pointer to the relevant CVS tree suffice? These documents

software grant questions

The software grant form () requests that the "List of software and other intellectual property covered by this agreement" be enumerated in Exhibit A. 1) What form should this enumeration take? Would a pointer to the relevant CVS tree suffice?

Re: Axion Status

servlets/BrowseList?list=dev&by=thread&from=204435> for the thread. Note that this gives two weeks for someone to object. Otherwise expect a signed software grant on or about 9 July 2004. - Rod On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Brian McCallister wrote: Just c

Re: Axion Status

On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Brian McCallister wrote: Just checking in again on Axion =) Last I heard (April) we were waiting on the final CLA and a software grant: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=incubator-general&m=108325596609966&w=2 Any progress? All the active committers that haven't yet signed as CL

RE: Incubator Status Report: Axion

On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > Again, IANAL, but in lieu of an informed declaration to the contrary, > > > I suggest that we would spend more time discussing it than it takes > > > t

RE: Incubator Status Report: Axion

On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Again, IANAL, but in lieu of an informed declaration to the contrary, I > suggest that we would spend more time discussing it than it takes to have > each person FAX in two documents. Unless those folks have disappeared from the project. We can try to

RE: Incubator Status Report: Axion

Ping? On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > Make sure that all of the contributors to the code submit the appropriate > > signed documents (http://www.apache.org/licenses/). I know that at least > > some have

RE: Incubator Status Report: Axion

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Make sure that all of the contributors to the code submit the appropriate > signed documents (http://www.apache.org/licenses/). I know that at least > some have not yet done so. There should be information in the STATUS file. > > For example, when th

RE: [VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > > I am as interested in making Axion's incubation status clear as you are. > > > Some sort of "incubation status" notice [or logo] > > You mean like http://incubator.apache.org/imag

RE: [RESULT][VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > > I've noticed that a disturbing number of VOTE threads on this list never > > have a corresponding RESULT summary, so here's the result for the vote I > > recently called: > > AISI,

[RESULT][VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

to the .cwiki file if not to the site itself, assuming no one objects. On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > Since that first post hasn't drawn any response in over a week, let me try > this again, this time under a VOTE thread, and with an alternative in > light of the rec

Re: problems running forrest

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > IIUC you're just unlucky, as just yesterday a commit broke CVS forrest, > with the error you show. > > I'll see to fix it today and publish the website for you if you make > changes (I had done so last time). > Seems to work now. Thanks. - Rod <

Re: [VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > *Every* project comes here saying "well, but I'm different, I don't need > this and that, come on, take it easier on me". So in the end, they are > not different at all in this ;-) Without trying to be flippant, I'd urge you to consider the possibl

RE: [VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

; to "incubator" in the location bar, to be a sufficient indication of the project's incubation status, while something glaring, like a notice on top of every page, to be an insufficient one. The current approach seems fairly subtle to human eyes, and introduces a number of undesirable em

RE: [VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

7;s web site at http://incubator.apache.org/ is contrary to this goal--it creates work that will have to be undone once the project has graduated. On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > > Ceki Gülcü wrote: > > > Rodney Wal

RE: [VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Ceki Gülcü wrote: > > Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > > My concern isn't the difficulty of copying files from one directory to > > > another. It is pointing an exisiting user, developer and google-bot > > > commun

problems running forrest

Following the instructions at http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html, I seem to be having problems running forrest. Specifically, when I run "forrest run" from the incubator directory, I get an error like this: 13:45:52.691 EVENT ERROR (2003-12-22) 13:45.52:681 [access ] (Unkno

RE: [VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

does all this disruption buy for us? On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > In other words: > > >http://incubator.apache.org/axion > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >[EMAIL PROT

Re: [VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

e had previously discussed this, notably <http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01873.html>. On Sat, 20 Dec 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > Ok, great, thanks Nicola. > > > > I had assumed, based upon both the exsiting incubat

Re: [VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

Ok, great, thanks Nicola. I had assumed, based upon both the exsiting incubator documenation and a number of discussions, that Axion would be set up at: http://db.apache.org/axion [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] etc. Indeed that is what was proposed, since it's considered a bit of hassle

Re: [VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003, Greg Stein wrote: > The Board spoke about this topic for nearly 45 minutes yesterday at our > Board meeting. We started to come up with some guidelines for when a > project needs incubation, or when a PMC can directly handle it itself. We > need to work through that on the Boa

[VOTE] Re: request for incubation: axion database project

1 Yes, let the Apache DB project handle it (i.e., "graduate" it immediately) [ ] 0 Abstain [ ] -1 No, if Axion is to become a part of the ASF, it should be incubated here first. On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > The Axion Databas

Re: [VOTE] New Incubator rules and scope definition (long)

On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Leo Simons wrote: > It's a big thing to vote on all at once. I still have > question marks with some points. What I'm looking > for is some signal that we are moving in a direction > where the TLPs will actually *want* to follow > incubation procedure (which would be a good si

request for incubation: axion database project

che id: geirm) * James Burke (tigris id: jburke) * James Strachan (tigris id: jstrachan, apache id: jstrachan) * Jason van Zyl (tigris id: jvanzyl, apache id: jvanzyl) * Morgan Delagrange (tigris id: morgand, apache id: morgand) * Martin Poeschl (tigris id: mpoeschl, apache id: mpoeschl) * Rodney

Re: projects incubated by the incubator PMC

On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > There is no reason for a project to have a final destination until > it has to go somewhere other than incubator, at which point it can > decide whether it wants to be a TLP (calling for a board vote) or > part of an existing project (calling for that p

minimum advance notice for "review of activity"?

Under , we state: "The Incubator PMC SHALL inform Podlings of review dates at least 4 weeks in advance." and that "At least one week prior to each review, the Mentor MUST pr

Re: projects "in" versus "entering" versus "affiliated with" the incubator

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > The page is obsolete and does not reflect reality, the distinction is > really not there. > > I'm finishing the new website now, please wait a few more days. > > In the meantime look here for more fresh info: > http://www.apache.org/~nicolaken/white

projects "in" versus "entering" versus "affiliated with" the incubator

On the "Projects Being Incubated" page (), there are four categories listed: * "Projects in the Incubator" (AltRMI, FtpServer, WSRP4J, JaxMe, Pluto) * "Projects entering the Incubator" (Apache Geronimo, XMLBeans) * "Projects affiliated to the Incu

Re: incubation requirements for axion at apache db?

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > Assuming the Apache DB PMC approves Axion as a new subproject: > > > > 1) Other than the attribution of copyright to the ASF, the switch to > > the > > ASL, and the submission of a signed CLA for those that haven't already > > done so, what specfic c

Re: incubation requirements for axion at apache db?

r PMC." and "3. The "graduation requirements" for leaving the Incubator. Basically, what are the pre-defined goals that must be met before the podling can leave the Incubator?" On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > Ok, well, that's a procedural respons

Re: ezmlm problems?

nse I'm getting back, if you think that would help. On Sat, 18 Oct 2003, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > > A minor correction, it seems that *-get works when requesting a > > single message, (e.g., [EMAIL PROTECTED]), but not for > > a r

RE: incubation requirements for axion at apache db?

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Looking forward to seeing Axion come over. Will you want to transfer Scarab > info? If Scarab means what tigris.org calls "issuezilla", then yes, at least the open stuff, but the current bug database is small enough that we could do that manually if

Re: incubation requirements for axion at apache db?

Ok, well, that's a procedural response, similar to the one available on the incubator site, and is helpful as such, but I was also hoping to understand the process in practice. That is, what are the criteria by which the incubator PMC determines whether or not a project is ready for "graduation"?

Re: ezmlm problems?

not a command the system recognizes. On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > I seem to be having trouble getting various ezmlm commands like > general-index, general-get and general-thread to work. No matter what I > send all I get back is the generic help (general-help) message, toget

ezmlm problems?

I seem to be having trouble getting various ezmlm commands like general-index, general-get and general-thread to work. No matter what I send all I get back is the generic help (general-help) message, together with the headers from the message I sent. Is this user error or is something not right o

incubation requirements for axion at apache db?

Axion () is a Java-based relational database engine that was among the set of "seed projects" named in the proposal for Apache DB (). The Axion team is considering moving to the Apache DB project, and depending upon the sourc