On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > The page is obsolete and does not reflect reality, the distinction is > really not there. > > I'm finishing the new website now, please wait a few more days. > > In the meantime look here for more fresh info: > http://www.apache.org/~nicolaken/whiteboard/incubator-draft-new-site/index.html > > These docs are more near to the real incubation process: > http://www.apache.org/~nicolaken/whiteboard/incubator-draft-new-site/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html > http://www.apache.org/~nicolaken/whiteboard/incubator-draft-new-site/incubation/Process_Description.html > http://www.apache.org/~nicolaken/whiteboard/incubator-draft-new-site/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html >
Thanks Nicola. These seem to provide the level of detail I was looking for. I'm trying to prepare a note for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to describe in detail the process of moving to Apache DB. Is it safe to assume this draft site accurately represents the current policy? (I.e., how "draft" is this?) By the way, two suggestions on content: * I think "partecipate" in "howtopartecipate.html" and related links and content is meant to be "participate" * I'd suggest the term "candidate" (as is used in Roles_and_Responsibilities) or "project" (as in "incubating [sub]project"), or even the term "pod", rather than the diminutive "podlet" in describing the "entity being incubated" - Rod <http://radio.weblogs.com/0122027/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
