On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Noel J. Bergman wrote: > Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > > I've noticed that a disturbing number of VOTE threads on this list never > > have a corresponding RESULT summary, so here's the result for the vote I > > recently called: > > AISI, the reason there was no summary is that the vote was halted on the > grounds that it was improper. Because DB had already voted to accept the > project, the Incubator does not vote to accept it (ballot 1). If you want > to view ballot 2 as a vote to release it, I guess you could say it failed. > But I think we tried moving from the pro forma phase to actually trying to > work with you. :-) > > --- Noel
Acked. The notion of automatically accepting projects already accepted by a sponsor seems like a good one. It's not very clear from the process docs that this is the case. Indeed, it's not very clear from the process docs that a VOTE is ever required, it just says that the PMC "may" require a vote. As a point of clarification, does that mean that someone with the appropriate karma can create a new podling via lazy consensus (i.e., just do it until someone pipes up with a -1)? I don't know what "AISI" stands for, but the way. For that matter, what's RT stand for in [RT]? - Rod <http://radio.weblogs.com/0122027/> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
