[FtpServer]Site Generation

Hi, Sorry for the cross posting. I don't know where from I shall get the help. Recently I have changed the FTP server doc. Can somebody please tell me how can I update the FTP server site. May be it is dumb question but I am really novice in this site management. Thanks in advance, Rana

RE: Proposal: Sponsor becomes Mentor

> > I just posted a "new project" form for people to review. And it seems from > > other messages that Nicola Ken wants to postpone new project adoption until > > he finishes the web site renovation, since that includes the new STATUS > > form. > There are a bunch of things that the directory pro

Re: Proposal: Sponsor becomes Mentor

Noel J. Bergman wrote: Just wondering who the mentor is for the Directory Project? I would suspect that Noel is the official Sponsor however I have not seen any discussions concerning the projects mentor. AFAIK, Nicola Ken and I are doing that duty. Also wanted to check and see

Re: Proposal: Sponsor becomes Mentor

Berin Lautenbach wrote: From: Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The name "Sponsoring Entity" is wierd, and the more I think of it, the more it seems artificial. Yup. It was the best I could think of at the time :<. What we need is something that sponsors the project, and w

Re: Proposal: Sponsor becomes Mentor

> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The name "Sponsoring Entity" is wierd, and the more I think of it, the > more it seems artificial. Yup. It was the best I could think of at the time :<. > > What we need is something that sponsors the project, and will accept it, > and someone

Re: projects "in" versus "entering" versus "affiliated with" the incubator

The page is obsolete and does not reflect reality, the distinction is really not there. Right, the existing web site is nothing more than a draft. That is why it is a bit silly to create all these other "draft" and "whiteboard" and "wiki" places for other drafts. Please move all relevant content

Re: Proposal: Sponsor becomes Mentor

Ahhh What I would like to have seen was not * Sponsor * Shepherd styled category of entities, but * Mentor * Coach (Coacher?) styled category of entities. Horay! That's "incubation". :-) -- Tetsuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- P.S. I have not been able to interpret "podling" into japane

minimum advance notice for "review of activity"?

Under , we state: "The Incubator PMC SHALL inform Podlings of review dates at least 4 weeks in advance." and that "At least one week prior to each review, the Mentor MUST pr

RE: RE: Proposal: Sponsor becomes Mentor

> Just wondering who the mentor is for the Directory Project? I would suspect > that Noel is the official Sponsor however I have not seen any discussions > concerning the projects mentor. AFAIK, Nicola Ken and I are doing that duty. > Also wanted to check and see if there are any things (loose e

Re: RE: Proposal: Sponsor becomes Mentor

Hello, Just wondering who the mentor is for the Directory Project? I would suspect that Noel is the official Sponsor however I have not seen any discussions concerning the projects mentor. Also wanted to check and see if there are any things (loose ends) still expected of the Directory Projec

Re: projects "in" versus "entering" versus "affiliated with" the incubator

Rodney Waldhoff wrote: * I'd suggest the term "candidate" (as is used in Roles_and_Responsibilities) or "project" (as in "incubating [sub]project"), or even the term "pod", rather than the diminutive "podlet" in describing the "entity being incubated" +1 -- Stephen J. McConnell mailto:[EMAI

RE: Proposal: Sponsor becomes Mentor

> > The name "Sponsoring Entity" is wierd, and the more I think of it, the > > more it seems artificial. > > > What we need is something that sponsors the project, and will accept > > it, and someone that mentors the project, which are 2 concepts, not 3 > > as now. > I'm +1 on the terminology and

Re: Proposal: Sponsor becomes Mentor

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: The name "Sponsoring Entity" is wierd, and the more I think of it, the more it seems artificial. What we need is something that sponsors the project, and will accept it, and someone that mentors the project, which are 2 concepts, not 3 as now. Nicolas: I'm +1 on

RE: Proposal: Sponsor becomes Mentor

> - Sponsor: the Apache entity (PMC) that sponsors the project > and that will recieve it upon succesfull incuabtion. This doesn't work in the case where there is no such PMC (e.g., the project will be a TLP), or when the final destination has not be decided. It pre-supposes a dest

Re: projects "in" versus "entering" versus "affiliated with" the incubator

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > The page is obsolete and does not reflect reality, the distinction is > really not there. > > I'm finishing the new website now, please wait a few more days. > > In the meantime look here for more fresh info: > http://www.apache.org/~nicolaken/white

Proposal: Sponsor becomes Mentor

The name "Sponsoring Entity" is wierd, and the more I think of it, the more it seems artificial. What we need is something that sponsors the project, and will accept it, and someone that mentors the project, which are 2 concepts, not 3 as now. Hence I propose that we have: - Sponsor: the Apac

Re: incubation requirements for axion at apache db?

Rodney Waldhoff wrote: On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Roy T. Fielding wrote: ... There is no timeframe. Some take longer than others; some are ready before they even begin; and some never manage to begin. The process.html document implies that the rough timeframe should be known before the process is initi

Re: projects "in" versus "entering" versus "affiliated with" the incubator

Rodney Waldhoff wrote: On the "Projects Being Incubated" page (), there are four categories listed: * "Projects in the Incubator" (AltRMI, FtpServer, WSRP4J, JaxMe, Pluto) * "Projects entering the Incubator" (Apache Geronimo, XMLBeans) * "Projects

projects "in" versus "entering" versus "affiliated with" the incubator

On the "Projects Being Incubated" page (), there are four categories listed: * "Projects in the Incubator" (AltRMI, FtpServer, WSRP4J, JaxMe, Pluto) * "Projects entering the Incubator" (Apache Geronimo, XMLBeans) * "Projects affiliated to the Incu

Re: incubation requirements for axion at apache db?

On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > Assuming the Apache DB PMC approves Axion as a new subproject: > > > > 1) Other than the attribution of copyright to the ASF, the switch to > > the > > ASL, and the submission of a signed CLA for those that haven't already > > done so, what specfic c