On freesurfer-Linux-centos4_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.1.0 installed on Ubuntu
16.04 LTS
mri_convert is seg faulting
>>ls brain*
> brain.finalsurfs.mgz brainmask.auto.mgz brainmask.mgz brain.mgz
>
> mri_convert ./brain.mgz --in_type mgz --out_type nii -o ./brain.nii
>
> $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2
Hi Doug,
Yes the quoted lines were output fromt her terminal.
ls -l brain.mgz
> -rwxrwx--- 1 myuser myuser 1216430 May 18 17:06 brain.mgz
>
I have many Tb of disk space. I can chmod 777 the files and still seg
faults.
Thanks
Josh
-
Joshua Lee, Ph.D.
Post-Doctoral Researcher
MIND Ins
I had replaced the user name in the output I posted to the listserv for
security reasons. I am not on a virtual machine. Fresh install on bare
metal.
ls -l ../
...
> drwxr-xr-x 13 myuser myuser 4096 Jun 2 11:50 mri
> ...
>
>
-
Joshua Lee, Ph.D.
Post-Doctoral Researcher
MIND Institut
I do note that I can enter "freeview ./brain.mgz" and the image opens. Then
I can manuall save it as a .nii
-
Joshua Lee, Ph.D.
Post-Doctoral Researcher
MIND Institute
University of California, Davis
530.747.3805
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Joshua Lee wrote:
> I had replaced
Perhaps something to do with
libcrypt-2.*.so ??
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2014-September/040528.html
-
Joshua Lee, Ph.D.
Post-Doctoral Researcher
MIND Institute
University of California, Davis
530.747.3805
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Joshua Lee wrote:
> I
reading from
./brain.mgz...Segmentation fault (core dumped)*
-
Joshua Lee, Ph.D.
Post-Doctoral Researcher
MIND Institute
University of California, Davis
530.747.3805
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:44 PM, dgw wrote:
> If you must use 5.1 (I would recommend upgrading), then try what Zeke
> sugges
5.1?
Josh
-
Joshua Lee, Ph.D.
Post-Doctoral Researcher
MIND Institute
University of California, Davis
530.747.3805
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Joshua Lee wrote:
> Unfortunately this does not seem to work.
>
> locate libcrypt-2
>
>
> */lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypt-2.23.so
Installing the latest version of FreeSurfer has resolved this problem. So
as long as the post-processing tools are compatible with these data then I
should be fine.
Thanks.
Josh
-
Joshua Lee, Ph.D.
Post-Doctoral Researcher
MIND Institute
University of California, Davis
530.747.3805
On Thu, Jun
When loading qdec I get
can't find package BLT
FsgdfPlot::InitFsgdf: Couldn't find fsgdfPlot.tcl
on Ubuntu with FreeSurfer5.3
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The
tkcon.tcl
fs-make.tclscuba_glut.tcl twocond-flat.tcl
fs-views.tcl scuba.tcltwocond-masked-views.tcl
histolabel.tcl setdefpatchview.tcl twocond-views.tcl
mk-fieldsign.tcl solmovie-flat.tclwrappers.tcl
-
Joshua Lee, Ph.D.
Post-Doctoral Researcher
lag via an
expert.opts file."
Are these expert options doing something similar to what was done in
Lüsebrink, Wollrab, Speck, 2013 in *NeuroImage*, in which they " conforms
the data to the minimum voxel size, which is equal in all directions if
data with an isotropic resolution is used"
Hi Alan,
Typically subfields segmentation requires hi-resolution data (e.g. 0.4 x
0.4 mm in-plane resolution). The thickness of a CA subfield typically range
between 0.5-1.00 mm, but 1.5 T data does not achieve sub-millimeter
resolutions. Further, subfield segmentation typically requires
high-cont
Thanks for the clarification Eugenio. Would saying that it relies on shape
instead of surface be more accurate? I would like to understand better.
Also, it is good news that there are plans to model the SLRM.
Josh
-
Joshua Lee
Doctoral Candidate
Department of Psychology &
Center for Mind
Hi All,
I wanted to get peoples advice on the best method of
registration/interpolation to use on a manually traced segmentation (and
its structural) that is not in the same space and orientation as the
structurals I started Freesurfer with (although they both originally came
from the same image.
ri_label2vol to convert the mask into FS conformed space
> (assuming that that is what you want to do).
> doug
>
> On 03/22/2013 04:43 PM, Joshua Lee wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I wanted to get peoples advice on the best method of
> > registration/interpolation t
Hi Doug,
Is a standard 12 affine registration sufficient to get a subjects
structural (in a different orientation) into the same space as norm.mgz, or
will I need some non-linear registration? Basically, what kind of
transforms are applied to go from orig to norm?
-
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
atial transforms to go from orig to norm. They are in the
> same space.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Joshua Lee wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>>
>> Is a standard 12 affine registration sufficient to get a subjects
>> structural
>> (in a dif
A subcortical segmentation error sometimes get Freesurfer (v 5.1) is
cortical areas coming over into the hippocampus, ignoring the wm inferior
and lateral to the hippocmapus (coronal). See attached png.
Will adding wm control points help, or do they not inform the aseg
segmentation. What is the bes
Hi All,
Am I right in reading the dev table that if I just want the aseg.mgz, (not
the stats output), I only need to run auto-recon1 and auto-recon2?
I need to run 250+ brains just to get the aseg volume, so if I can shave
off 4-10 hours off each that would be huge.
__
In fact, couldn't I stop after calabel if all I want is the aseg.mgz?
-
Josh
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Joshua Lee wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Am I right in reading the dev table that if I just want the aseg.mgz, (not
> the stats output), I only need to run auto-recon1 and a
gt; cheers,
> Natalie
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Bruce Fischl > wrote:
>
>> Hi Josh,
>>
>> yes, I think that's correct.
>>
>> Bruce
>> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Joshua Lee wrote:
>>
>> > In fact, couldn't I s
The aseg has shown poor performance in my sample. Are there settings,
atlases, etc, available that might improve performance?
-
Josh
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
Looking forward to it.
-
Josh
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Lilla Zollei
wrote:
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> We do not yet have a publicly available atlas for that population. We are
> working on it though and will announce it as soon as it is ready.
>
> Lilla
>
>
> On Tue
Hi All,
I recently ran a number of 2-yr-old brains through Freesurfer, and overall
Freesurfer did well considering the age group. However, a subset (~10%) had
catastrophic failures in the left termporal lobe in which parahippocampal
cortex bled over into the hippocampal region. I've since added c
I have read that the hippo-subfield algorithm uses the aseg for
initialization, and then uses the original MRI data. By original, does that
mean it up-samples the conformed 1mm data to .5mm, or does that mean it
takes the original original input (i.e. my 0.7 mm isotropic MPRAGE) and
upsamples it to
lag to change this? The algorithm is
> pretty resolution-independent, and could certainly benefit from
> higher-res data.
> Cheers,
> /Eugenio
>
> On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 13:34 -0700, Joshua Lee wrote:
> > I have read that the hippo-subfield algorithm uses the aseg for
> >
I'm trying to understand Leemput's subfield algorithm better as implemented
in Freesurfer. Does the algorithm make use of intensity differences in the
internal hippocampal lamina from the subject's T1 image to warp meshes and
assign subfield probabilities? Or does it depend only on outward boundari
result in very different subfield segmentations?
Josh
-
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Center for Mind and Brain &
Department of Psychology
University of California, Davis
530.747.3805
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> Hi Josh
>
> it depends on intensity differences i
atlas).
> /E
>
>
>
> On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 12:42 -0700, Joshua Lee wrote:
> > Thanks Bruce and Eugenio,
> >
> > Suppose I had two identical images of a subject, but in one image I
> > reduced the contrast of internal lamina while leaving the rest of the
&
Dear Freesurfers,
>From the Wiki Freesurfer surface stream follows something like:
1. Affine registration to Tal.
2. Bias correction and skull stripping
3. Classify WM
4. Cut hemisphere planes
5. Tile WM surface
6. Refine WM surface following GM-WM intensity gradients
7. Nudg
Hi Experts,
I just wanted confirm my understanding that Freesurfer does not employ
multi-atlas label fusion methods. Is this correct?
Thanks,
Best,
Joshua
-
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Center for Mind and Brain &
Department of Psychology
University of California, Davis
530.747.
tribute the manually labeled data which we don't have IRB approval for
> Bruce
>
>
>
> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013, Joshua Lee wrote:
>
> Hi Experts,
>>
>> I just wanted confirm my understanding that Freesurfer does not employ
>> multi-atlas label fusion method
Well you could mri_binarize the three volumes, then subtract regions
using fslmaths from the FSL suite. Of course this would create gaps
between your formerly adjacent regions.
Joshua
-
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Center for Mind and Brain &
Department of Psychology
University of Califo
Is it possible/pracitcal? This is a long step, and unfortunately my
analysis computer was rebooted in the middle of this step, and I was hoping
to present the volumes tomorrow.. ouch.
-
Josh
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https
not that I have any real hope lol
-
Josh
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Joshua Lee wrote:
> Is it possible/pracitcal? This is a long step, and unfortunately my
> analysis computer was rebooted in the middle of this step, and I was hoping
> to present the volumes tomorrow.. ouch.
&
ischl wrote:
> no, sorry :<
>
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Joshua Lee wrote:
>
> Is it possible/pracitcal? This is a long step, and unfortunately my
>> analysis
>> computer was rebooted in the middle of this step, and I was hoping to
>> present the volumes tomorrow
In my data-set I have observed that Freesurfer has a tendency to include
some amygdala into the hippocampal head, despite a visible strip of alveus
white-matter segregating hippocampus from amygdala in my images. Has this
tendency been noticed by others? If so, has anyone found a non-manual
correct
I used mri_convert to resample my norm.mgz to 0.25 mm iso nii.gz, and then
again back up to 1mm isotropic space. The resultant image shifted up a
voxel from the original converted straght to nii.gz. This points to the
resampling procedure, and not the conversion to different file format.
Suggestion
re your exact mri_convert commands?
> doug
>
> On 08/09/2012 06:05 PM, Joshua Lee wrote:
> > I used mri_convert to resample my norm.mgz to 0.25 mm iso nii.gz, and
> > then again back up to 1mm isotropic space. The resultant image shifted
> > up a voxel from the original converted s
Hi All,
I tried to convert a high res T2 image using mri_convert and got this error
message:
nifti1Read(): unsupported slice timing pattern 5
Any advice? Complete message below:
mri_convert DKA2921c_20120807_001_003_t2_
tse_hippo.img bb.nii.gz
$Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.179.2.2 2011/05/16 20:53:
I started over from the .dcm and I didn't encounter the error anymore. So
alls well.
-
Josh
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Joshua Lee wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I tried to convert a high res T2 image using mri_convert and got this
> error message:
>
> nifti1Read(): u
for the next
release?
gratefully,
Joshua
-
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Center for Mind and Brain &
Department of Psychology
University of California, Davis
530.747.3805
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> Hi Joshua
>
> sorry, I haven't found the time to
Can I get thickness values for the perirhinal (posterior parahipp too
maybe???)
I came across
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/PerirhinalArea35Labels but the
labels download link isn't existent. I tried running the commands on that
page anyway but of course it can't find the label...
Thank
k can probably get you a beta
> Bruce
>
>
>
> On Dec 11, 2012, at 8:25 PM, Joshua Lee wrote:
>
> Can I get thickness values for the perirhinal (posterior parahipp too
> maybe???)
> I came across
> http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/PerirhinalArea35Labels but the
do I need to download the whole freesurfer package again to get it?
-
Josh
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the p
Thanks for all your hard work on the coming release. Is there a feature
list of whats in the new release? This would be helpful in deciding to wait
on a new project I'm about to start.
Thanks!
-
Josh
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Anastasia Yendiki <
ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> Not
I dont know if this applies but I sometimes have really long run times when
image quality is bad, usually from subject movement. I drop them.
Josh
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:31 PM, paul horton wrote:
> Hi Bruce and Martin,
>
> Thanks for your replies.
>
> With regards to the questions from Bruce,
Does this mean that using Freesurfer at sub-1mm isotropic resolutions will
not be possible next version?
Josh
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Nick Schmansky
wrote:
> Colin,
>
> It will still error if any dimension is greater than 256, which then means
> the flag -cw256 must be added to recon-al
rough the standard
> recon-all, then run a postprocessing surface deformation on the higher res
> data. Our preliminary results are pretty encouraging on T1s, T2s and FLAIRs.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
>
>
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2013, Joshua Lee wrote:
>
> Does this mean that using F
On 30 Jan 2013, at 13:41, Jacobs H (NP) wrote:
>>
>> Message: 7
>> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:19:25 -0500 (EST)
>> From: Bruce Fischl
>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] beta
>> To: Colin Reveley
>> Cc: Joshua Lee
>
I would like to upsample the aseg.mgz to
Dimensions: 370X512X512
Spacing 0.5mm in x,y, and z.
Any suggestions?
-
Josh
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The informati
forgot to mention, this is to upsample Freesurfer Aseg to compare with
manually traced hipp volumes from original structural images.
-
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Center for Mind and Brain &
Department of Psychology
University of California, Davis
530.747.3805
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:1
I do indeed. Thank you very much!
-
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Center for Mind and Brain &
Department of Psychology
University of California, Davis
530.747.3805
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> Hi Josh
>
> do you have a volume with those dimensions? If so
Hi All,
I'm just wondering what kind of protocol people are using to address
the situation when Freesurfer has a catastrophic failure in accurately
segmenting the sub-cortical structures. While manual editing is an
option, are there upstream changes that might improve the subcortical
segmentation
If I want to install the new Freesurfer version but retain the older
Freesurfer install as well, what issues might I face?
Is it simply sourcing the usual setup scripts?
export FREESURFER_HOME=/freesurfer
source $FREESURFER_HOME/SetUpFreeSurfer.sh
-
Josh
__
etc.
> and then
> export FREESURFER_HOME=/freesurfer/5.1
> etc
> Hth, S.
>
>
> On Thu, February 21, 2013 12:59 pm, Shantanu Ghosh wrote:
> > Hi Josh,
> > you can modify the SetUpFreeSurfer.sh to source the correct version.
> > Hth, Shantanu
> >
> > On Th
expects,
would the hipposubfields algorithm do its magic on this volume?
Joshua
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Center for Mind and Brain &
Department of Psychology
University of California, Davis
530.747.3805
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga <
gariko...@gmail.com
The new Freesurfer has an optional flag to adjust NU intensity correction
parameters for images acquired on 3T scanners. There exists also a flag
for MPRage sequences.
I use 3T MPRages. What is the recommended use in this case?
Thanks
Josh
___
Freesurf
Hello Freesurfer Gurus,
I was wondering whether the original individual subject atlases used to
construct the probabilistic atlases for subcortical segmentation have been
made available for download?
Thanks!
josh
-
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@
I understand. Thank you Bruce, for you good work.
Joshua
-
Joshua Lee
Doctoral Candidate
Department of Psychology &
Center for Mind and Brain
University of California, Davis
530.747.3805
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Bruce Fischl
wrote:
> Hi Josh
>
> sorry, it was impossib
Dear Freesurfer Experts,
I am trying to better understand what regions of the hippocampal formation
are meant to be included in the hippocampal label (e.g. inclusion of the
alveus/fornix, lateral boundaries around the subiculum, superior boundaries
in the tail, etc.).
Has the protocol used to man
Dear Experts,
I've been collecting hi-res hippocampal scans with a 32 ch coil on a 3T
Siemens Trio to manually segment hippocampal subfields. However, I wonder
whether the protocol is appropriate for use with the new Freesurfer subfield
segmentation tool.
Specifically, our hi-res scan does not ca
Are there any existing Amazon EC2 AMI registered publicly that can be used?
I want to analyze a lot of data fast.
Thanks,
-
Joshua Lee
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo
I think I may have found it as a public ami with freesurfer 5.1. Testing it
out on Bert right now. Thanks!!
-
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Center for Mind and Brain &
Department of Psychology
University of California, Davis
530.747.3805
2011/10/30 Joshua Lee
> I think I may have found
ts/recon-all.log
To report a problem, see
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
-
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Center for Mind and Brain &
Department of Psychology
University of California, Davis
530.747.3805
___
Freesurfer mailing lis
Small Update: Error Disappears if Using Freesurfer version 5.0 instead of
5.1. However, since I am keenly interested in the hippocampal-subfield
segmentation capabilities of the most recent version, I am loathe to
regress to an earlier version of FreeSurfer
-
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Center for
Thats an interesting suggestion, givien my recently reported issues with
the talairach in FreeSurfer 5.1.
-
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Center for Mind and Brain &
Department of Psychology
University of California, Davis
530.747.3805
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
Thanks Nick,
Is use-mritotal equivalent to what version 5.0 does by default?
Also, any suggestions on why this talairach error would occur only on a
portion of my data, despite all being collected with the same imaging
protocol, same conversions from dicom, etc?
-
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Wed, 2011-11-02 at 16:10 -0400, Joshua Lee wrote:
> > Thanks Nick,
> >
> > Is use-mritotal equivalent to what version 5.0 does by default?
> >
> > Also, any suggestions on why this talairach error would occur only on
> > a portion of my data, despite all being collect
1
>> uses orig.mgz.
>>
>> its hard to say why it would fail for some subjects but not others,
>> other than head positioning and to some degree ventricle size makes a
>> difference.
>>
>> n.
>>
>> On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 16:10
arger disk
that comes with the instance. I had disk-write errors because the the main
partition ran out of space.
Anyway, ec2 rocks with Freesurfer.
-
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Center for Mind and Brain &
Department of Psychology
University of California, Davis
530.747.3805
2011/11/12 Nola
I'd try reinstalling virtualbox. Then I'd make sure that you adjust the vm
with enough ram, videocard memory, etc. It should work fine. I run the same
setup all the time, and I don't believe that this is a 'known issue'.
Joshua
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:25 AM, wrote:
> Hello Friends,
>
> I am
malicious
intent. Moreover, it could contain such scripts as makes the analysis
process easier.
-
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Center for Mind and Brain &
Department of Psychology
University of California, Davis
530.747.3805
2011/11/14 Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior
> Ok. I'll labe
At least by my reading of the Duvernoy Human Hippocampus atlas, the most
anterior and posterior extents of the hippocmapus (perhaps just a slice at
the tips in most scans) are almost entirely composed of the CA1 subfield.
Thoughts?
Joshua
-
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Center for Mind and Brain
irly minor points. Still, I wouldn't mind some comments on
these observations, as they were changes I have been proposing to make in
the segmentation protocol used in my lab.
Best,
Joshua
Joshua Lee
Graduate Student
Center for Mind and Brain &
Department of Psychology
University o
on for the licensing
>>> issue.
>>>
>>> --**--**
>>> -
>>> Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior
>>> Netfilter & SpeedComm Telecom-- www.netfilter.com.br
>>>
>>
Sounds like a virtualbox problem. Try reinstalling Virtualbox.. Try adding
a bit more video memory to the vm.
BTW, is there an error message, or does it just silently shut down?
-
Joshua
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Popescu, V. wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Please help with the following pro
>
> Best,
>
> Veronica
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
> --
>
> *From:* nimzodisas...@gmail.com [mailto:nimzodisas...@gmail.com] *On
> Behalf Of *Joshua Lee
> *Sent:* maandag 21 november 2011 17:20
> *To:* Popescu, V.
> *Cc:* freesurf
size). On the host there is room enough. I tried memory
> ballooning but it doesn’t work (no 64-bits host).
>
> Thank you!
>
> Best,
>
> Veronica
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
> --
>
> *From:* nimzodisas...@gmail.com [mailto:ni
Hi All,
I would like to determine the volumes of a segmented region below or above
an arbitrary line in one of the planes. For example, what would be the
remaining volume of a label when z >= nth slice, where I would have
previously determined the appropriate value of n.
Thanks,
Josh
__
OK, I think I can take the output of binarize and then use FSL's fslroi
tool to split up on my plane, the find the volume of that final
mask...that will work as long as the output of binarize is in the same
space as its input.?.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Joshua Lee wrote:
>
ab, like
> aseg = MRIread('aseg.mgz');
> vol = length(aseg.vol(:,:,n:256) == ID);
> where ID is the code number for the ROI you want as found in
> $FREESURFER_HOME/**FreeSurferColorLUT.txt
> doug
>
> Joshua Lee wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I would
ok at particular regions, say left hipp???
Josh
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> probably not, as the aseg.stats calculation uses partial volume estimates.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, Joshua Lee wrote:
>
> Hey Doug, THanks. That loo
I'm glad you caught that because I suddenly got really confused! Thank
Bruce for all your hard work!
Josh
-
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> oops, I meant the aseg.stats, not the aseg.mgz
>
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, Joshua Lee wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
Nov 30, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Joshua Lee wrote:
> I'm glad you caught that because I suddenly got really confused! Thank
> Bruce for all your hard work!
> Josh
> -
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Bruce Fischl
> wrote:
>
>> oops, I meant the aseg.stats, n
suggests, would
allow the edits I think, but then I'd have to rewrite the file from
matlab.. I think.
Josh
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> yes
>
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, Joshua Lee wrote:
>
> Actually, I have one last-last question.
>> If I use m
Forgive me, I hadn't realize that tkmedit had a fill a function. I can do
what I propsed easily. Thanks again!
-
Joshua
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Joshua Lee wrote:
> Since it has be reiterated many times that aseg.stats is calulated using
> estimates of partial volumes th
of memory for one
recon-all process to ever reach...)
To solve this, you need to get a 64 bit installation, or find a way to stop
MRIalloc from needing so much memory.
Best of luck
Joshua
-
Joshua Lee
Center for Mind and Brain &
Department of Psychology
University of California, Davis
On
I'm relatively new to Freesurfer, and have mostly focused of the aseg.mgz
segmentation. However, I am also interested in entorhinal cortex and loaded
the label up in tkmedit. What I noticed was that it seemed each label
essentially noted the border between white and gray matter, but didn't
really c
I am not an expert but I'll say this as far as compliance to Duvernoy: In
the body of the hippocampus, compliance to Duvernoy is quite strongmuch
better than any others I've seen. However, according to my reading of
Duvernoy, the positions of the subfields change in the anterior head and
poster
Hi All,
I am wanting to run a functional analysis in spm using the hippo-subfields
as individual roi's. Thus I need to convert into a binary mask that is in
SPM space.
Knowing that the sub-field segmentations are probabilities [0..255] I chose
a threshold (i.e. ~95% certainty, corresponding to a v
I think many have better scans than 1mm. Right now I'm using 0.7mm iso with
decent snr, and am collecting 2 scans (about 7 min each), and on most
slices I can see internal structural detail. It does seem a shame that all
this detail is not used for hippo-subfield segmentation.
-
Joshu
Dear experts,
The hippocampal-subfield are expressed as probability maps. For each
subfield, each voxel is assigned a probability of inclusion on a scale of
[0-255]=[0-1]. However, If I were to select only voxels from each
subfield's probability map corresponding to a >50% chance (i.e.
mri_binariz
Ha nevermind. While true, I can just mask the masks with each other and
drop the over lapped regions.
-
Josh
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Joshua Lee wrote:
> Dear experts,
>
> The hippocampal-subfield are expressed as probability maps. For each
> subfield, each voxel i
That is, I can use fslmaths from fsl suite to subtract my binarized
subfield rois.
-
Josh
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Joshua Lee wrote:
> Ha nevermind. While true, I can just mask the masks with each other and
> drop the over lapped regions.
> -
> Josh
>
>
> On Tue,
ure versions
of Freesurfer will limit use of the old stream to situations in which
tal-check fails.
Thanks you all.
Sincerely,
Joshua Lee
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The
>
> best,
>
> Alan
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Joshua Lee wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I thought I'd share my recent experiences with the newest Freesurfer v.
>> 5.10 and subcortical segmentation.
>>
>> I ran a large sample of
I was told to use this recon-all flag and my talairach problem went away:
-use-mritotal
-
Josh
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Nick Schmansky
wrote:
> Ed,
>
> email probably trounced it. recon-all is a text file. attached is a
> gzipped version. use gunzip to unpack it.
>
> N.
>
>
>
> On Tue,
wait it was Nick that told me to use this a while back when I had tal-check
failures...I just posted about my current issues where I discuss my recent
experiences with a high rate of talairach failures in the current version.
-
Josh
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Joshua Lee wrote:
> I
As I mentioned, this new recon-all file resolved my issue with poor
hippocampal segmentations
-
Joshua Lee
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Steven Korycinski wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been following an e-mail on this list-serve from Joshua Lee
> regarding poor hippocampal se
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo