Since it has be reiterated many times that aseg.stats is calulated using
estimates of partial volumes that increase accuracy over obtaining volumes
from binarized masks, I wonder whether I might still incorporate this
advanced procedure while still bisecting a previous segmentation by some
arbitrary plane, say z=27.

I propose the following procedure as an example for splitting the left
amygdala (for example) and still using the partial volume estimation:


   1. Make copies of aseg.mgz, one each for the partial segmentation you
   want to create (e.g. aseg_anterior.mgz and aseg_posterior.mgz, to split the
   amygdala by the plane z =27 on some particular brain, by some particular
   protocol).
   2. Edit  aseg_posterior.mgz (e.g. by tkmedit) to remove all amygdala
   anterior to z = 27. Similarly edit aseg_anterior.mgz to remove posterior
   segments.
   3. Run the stats on these edited segmentations, and record the data in
   aseg_posterior.stats and aseg_anterior.stats

Does this sound reasonable and wise procedure? If so, is there a quick way
to remove the unwanted segmentations without manually using a brush, slice
by slice in tkmedit? Loading it into Matlab, like Doug suggests, would
allow the edits I think, but then I'd have to rewrite the file from
matlab.. I think.

Josh





On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>wrote:

> yes
>
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, Joshua Lee wrote:
>
>  Actually, I have one last-last question.
>> If I use mri_binarize on my aseg.mgz file, does it remain in the same
>> 'space'? Meaning, if I identify a z-coordinate of interest in aseg.mgz,
>> will
>> that z -coordinate still be valid in nifti file i'd have mri-Binarize
>> create?
>>
>> Josh
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Joshua Lee <jki...@ucdavis.edu> wrote:
>>      I'm glad you caught that because I suddenly got really confused!
>>      Thank Bruce for all your hard work!
>>      Josh
>>      -
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Bruce Fischl
>> <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>      oops, I meant the aseg.stats, not the aseg.mgz
>>
>> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, Joshua Lee wrote:
>>
>>      Hi Bruce,
>>
>>      I'll see if I can phrase this right
>>
>>      In aseg.mgz each region has essentially been given a
>>      unique number (e.g. 17
>>      for left hippocampus, for example). ROI taken from
>>      aseg.mgz volumes are
>>      non-probabilistic, yes-no affairs already.
>>      MRI_binarize just pulls this out
>>      when we want to look at particular regions, say left
>>      hipp???
>>
>>      Josh
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>      On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Bruce Fischl
>>      <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>      wrote:
>>           probably not, as the aseg.stats calculation
>>      uses partial volume
>>           estimates.
>>
>>           cheers
>>           Bruce
>>
>>      On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, Joshua Lee wrote:
>>
>>           Hey Doug, THanks. That looks simpler. I'll
>>      probably use
>>           that.
>>
>>           Question: Will the total volume of a ROI taken
>>      from
>>           aseg.mgz correspond to
>>           the volume given in aseg.stats?
>>
>>           Josh
>>
>>
>>
>>           On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Douglas N
>>      Greve
>>           <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>           wrote:
>>                If you have matlab, you can load the aseg
>>      into
>>           matlab, like
>>                aseg = MRIread('aseg.mgz');
>>                vol = length(aseg.vol(:,:,n:256) == ID);
>>                where ID is the code number for the ROI
>>      you want  as
>>           found in
>>                $FREESURFER_HOME/**FreeSurferColorLUT.txt
>>                doug
>>
>>                Joshua Lee wrote:
>>           Hi All,
>>
>>           I would like to determine the volumes of a
>>      segmented
>>           region
>>           below or above an arbitrary line in one of the
>>      planes. For
>>           example, what would be the remaining volume of
>>      a label
>>           when z >=
>>           nth slice, where I would have previously
>>      determined the
>>           appropriate value of n.
>>
>>
>>
>>           Thanks,
>>           Josh
>>
>>       -----------------------------**------------------------------**
>> -------------
>>
>>           _____________________________**__________________
>>           Freesurfer mailing list
>>           freesur...@nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu<Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>
>>       
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.**edu/mailman/listinfo/**freesurfer<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer>
>>
>>
>>           --
>>           Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
>>           MGH-NMR Center
>>           gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>           Phone Number: 617-724-2358 Fax: 617-726-7422
>>
>>           Bugs:
>>      
>> surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/**fswiki/BugReporting<http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting>
>>           FileDrop:
>>
>>       
>> www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/**facility/filedrop/index.html<http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html>
>>
>>
>>
>>           The information in this e-mail is intended only
>>      for the
>>           person to whom
>>           it is
>>           addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent
>>      to you in
>>           error and the
>>           e-mail
>>           contains patient information, please contact
>>      the Partners
>>           Compliance
>>           HelpLine at
>>           
>> http://www.partners.org/**complianceline<http://www.partners.org/complianceline>.
>>  If the
>>      e-mail was
>>           sent to you
>>           in error
>>           but does not contain patient information,
>>      please contact
>>           the sender
>>           and properly
>>           dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to