Thanks a lot for your prompt reply, Doug and Bruce. I did collect field
maps and just tried epidewarp.fsl, but I met with the following error "FSL
Version is 5.0.6, must be 3.X or 4.X". I've searched the email archives
and found a message about epidewarp.fsl that works with FSL 5 from Doug,
howeve
Hi Bruce,
I would like to make a ROI analysis where i'll investigate cortical thickness
of the labels - and afterwards use the labels to make a ROI analysis of fMRI
data and t1t2ratio data which is mapped onto the fsaverage (I've already made
an analysis "on the surface"). My question is how to
Each entry in the paradigm file represents a presentation characterized
by 4 values:
1. Onset time
2. Stimulus code (integer 0-N)
3. Stimulus duration
4. Weight (usually 1)
If each stimulus presentation has a different duration, then that would
be indicated in #3
doug
On 7/22/15 12:23 AM, Th
Try using this version
ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/epidewarp.fsl
On 7/22/15 4:03 AM, Bingjiang Lyu wrote:
Thanks a lot for your prompt reply, Doug and Bruce. I did collect
field maps and just tried epidewarp.fsl, but I met with the following
error "FSL Version
Hi Stefano
can you send us the command that was run and the full output?
Bruce
On Wed, 22 Jul
2015, std...@virgilio.it wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> mri_convert command line did not provide output file.
>
> This error was produced during the first computations of trac-all -prep
> command line.
>
>
Hi Silas
I think we already provide the information you want as we tabulate the
thickness of the different parcels in the various files in each subject's
stats dir. If you want to do the same thing with a different set of labels
draw the labels on fsaverage, use mri_label2label to map them to
The statements are automatically generated based on the names of the
variables you provide. In this case, you've included (global?) lh
thickness as a covariate. This will have a slope when plotted against
thickness at a given vertex, and this slope my differ between genders.
The "average" th
Thanks
Here is attached.
INFO: SUBJECTS_DIR is /Applications/freesurfer/subjects/subject_provaINFO:
Diffusion root is /Applications/freesurfer/subjects/subject_provaActual
FREESURFER_HOME /Applications/freesurfertrac-preproc -c
$SUBJECTS/Control75/scripts/dmrirc.local -log
$SUBJECTS/Control75/s
The commands look ok.
On 7/21/15 8:26 PM, std...@virgilio.it wrote:
My concern is whether this command line is correct
fcseed-config -segid 1 -seg ROI_MASK. -fsd rest -mean
-cfg mean.ROI_MASK.config
fcseed-sess -s SessXXX -cfg mean.ROI_MASK.config
Thank you
Stefano
Messaggio originale
Hello Freesurfer Experts
I have got the statistic P map ( -log10(p)),such as the
'Patient-smaller-Control_P_on_fsaverage4_lh.mgh', now i want to do the
cluster_wise correction with p<0.05., or do the FDR correction. Could you
please give me some suggestions how to do it? Thank you very much!
(I apologize in advance if I have not used the reply correctly and have
accidentally started a new thread - still new to this board!)
I thought it might help if I laid out all of my steps and code to reach the
part where I am having problems. I am attempting to use the longitudinal
pipeline ou
Dear Freesurfer Team,
I am inquiring as to what are the necessary steps to run in recon all if one
only wants to perform subcortical segmentation and relevant statistics. I just
want to run the necessary steps for these to run properly.
Thanks so much for your help.
TK
__
Hi Tony
if you run recon-all it will do everything needed. You could stop after
mri_ca_label I suppose, but then you won't be able to use the surfaces to
correct white matter and cortex.
cheers
Bruec
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015, Tony
Koroulakis wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer Team,
>
> I am inquiring as t
Hi there,
I’m running stable:
source /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0
Thanks,
Keji
> On Jul 21, 2015, at 4:56 PM, Douglas Greve wrote:
>
> what environment are you running in? ie, dev or stable?
>
> On 7/21/15 2:12 PM, Morenikeji Adebayo wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> When running selxavg for t
Thank you for the reply.
I am ended up using afni's make_random_timing.py to solve the problem.
Best,
Heeyoung
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Douglas N Greve
[gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
S
Thank you for the reply.
I am ended up using afni's make_random_timing.py to solve the problem.
Best,
Heeyoung
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of MCLAREN, Donald
[mclaren.don...@gmail.com]
S
*
Can you run the following
preproc-sess -debug -s nmasa_031_130412 -fsd bold -stc up -surface
fsaverage lhrh -min305 -fwhm 5 -per* |& tee fordoug.log
and send me fordoug.log
On 07/22/2015 02:12 PM, Morenikeji Adebayo wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I’m running stable:
>
> source /usr/local/freesurfe
Dear Freesurfers,
I am trying to use the longitudinal 2-stage model to run a mri_glmfit
analysis. How do I specify my FSGD file so that I compared spc or pc1 maps
instead of the regular thickness maps? Also, it is my understanding that I do
not have to run mris_preproc and mri_surf2su
Hi Doug,
When I run:
preproc-sess -debug -s nmasa_031_130412 -fsd bold -stc up -surface fsaverage
lhrh -min305 -fwhm 5 -per* |& tee fordoug.log
I get:
preproc-sess: No match.
Thanks,
Keji
> On Jul 22, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Douglas N Greve
> wrote:
>
> *
> Can you run the following
>
> prepro
Sorry, there should not be a * at the end of -per. I was just trying to
copy your command line with -debug as the first arg.
On 07/22/2015 04:02 PM, Morenikeji Adebayo wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> When I run:
> preproc-sess -debug -s nmasa_031_130412 -fsd bold -stc up -surface
> fsaverage lhrh -min305
Hi Koushik,
the output of the long_mris_slopes will be (by default) in each subjects
base/template directory, so you would have to map things to, e.g.
fsaverage and stack +smooth everythibng before running mri_glmfit. You
can also make use of the long_mris_slope flags --stack-spc and
--qcac
No problem! Here you go.
fordoug.log.docx
Description: MS-Word 2007 document
On Jul 22, 2015, at 4:30 PM, Douglas N Greve wrote:Sorry, there should not be a * at the end of -per. I was just trying to copy your command line with -debug as the first arg.On 07/22/2015 04:0
Thanks for the detailed reply Martin. When you say "here we mean really
subjects, not time points, as there is only one SPC map per subject", are you
referring to the base template name?
Also, as an extension to my previous question, if I have 3 timepoints (tp1, tp2
and tp3). Is it possible for
can you just send the log and not put it into a doc file?
On 07/22/2015 04:46 PM, Morenikeji Adebayo wrote:
> No problem! Here you go.
>
>
>
>> On Jul 22, 2015, at 4:30 PM, Douglas N Greve
>> mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, there should not be a * at the end of -per. I was
Yes, I mean the base name, but not repeated (so only lilsted once per
base), so you cannot simply copy that column from the long qdec file.
The PC1 is the slope of the linear fit with respect to the first time
point (the SPC with respect to the value of the linear fit at the mid
time point and
I sure can. Hopefully. Is the what you need?
fordoug.log
Description: Binary data
On Jul 22, 2015, at 5:01 PM, Douglas N Greve wrote:can you just send the log and not put it into a doc file?On 07/22/2015 04:46 PM, Morenikeji Adebayo wrote:No problem! Here you go.On Jul
Thanks again Martin. tp1 is really my baseline and so I want to compare the
rate of change from baseline to tp2 and tp3. So, I think the 1st option would
not work.
If I do use the longitudinal 2 stage model and then mri_glmfit, I would have 2
stacked files (1 for each comparison) and also, insi
Hi,
I am running longitudinal processing with Freesurfer according to the
instructions on freesurfer website here:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/LongitudinalStatistics
So in step2, I ran
recon-all -base template -tp subPRE/subPRE/mri/norm.mgz -tp
subPOST/subPOST/mri/norm.mgz -sd /home
Hi Koushik,
If that is what you want to do, the first option works:
(tp2-tp1) - (tp3-tp1) = tp2 - tp3
Best, Martin
On 07/22/2015 06:25 PM, Govindarajan, Koushik Athreya wrote:
> Thanks again Martin. tp1 is really my baseline and so I want to compare the
> rate of change from baseline to tp2 and
Hi Diane,
for -tp you need to pass the id of the processed time points from the
first step. So if you have two time points and called the subject ids
subPRE and subPOST then
recon-all -base subTemplate -tp subPRE -tp subPost -sd
Both the subPRE and the subPost need to be in the same subject
Thanks Martin. I will try that.
Regards
Koushik
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Martin Reuter
[mreu...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 6:48 PM
To: Freesurfer support l
31 matches
Mail list logo