___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hello,
does anyone succeed in using an Iphone as modem on 9-STABLE (sources
as of March 16) ?
I follow the instructions from
'http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=19995' using 'usbmuxd' and
'libimobiledevice' from ports.
When I start 'usbmuxd' I
Hi!
usb/165815
On 3/7/12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Would you please submit this as a PR?
>
> That way it Doesn't get (as) lost.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> adrian
>
> On 6 March 2012 16:53, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I
Hi!
Would you please submit this as a PR?
That way it Doesn't get (as) lost.
Thanks!
adrian
On 6 March 2012 16:53, Oliver Pinter wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I wrote a patch, to add support for Vodafone K3772-Z 3g modem.
>
> --
> Oli
Hi all!
I wrote a patch, to add support for Vodafone K3772-Z 3g modem.
--
Oliver Pinter
(Tresorium)
commit 092aa1246e1dde0ffe11a7bc06b540f4fa5851c9
Author: Oliver Pinter
Date: Wed Mar 7 01:47:51 2012 +0100
added support for Vodafone 3772-Z to u3g driver
ugen1.2: at usbus1
able to
> > interact with it.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > none3@pci0:5:0:0: class=0x070002 card=0x20282205
> > chip=0x015213a8
> > > > > > > > > rev=0x02 hdr=0x00
> > > > > &
ble port mapping!
> puc0: [FILTER]
> uart0: <16750 or compatible> on puc0
> uart0: [FILTER]
> uart1: <16750 or compatible> on puc0
> uart1: [FILTER]
>
>
>
> As I already pointed out, I do not have a line connected to the modem yet.
> This connection wi
attaches, but I am not able to
> interact with it.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > none3@pci0:5:0:0: class=0x070002 card=0x20282205
> chip=0x015213a8
> > > > > > > > rev=0x02 hdr=0x00
> > > > > > > >
;Exar Corp.'
> > > > > > > device = 'XR17C/D152 Dual PCI UART'
> > > > > > > class = simple comms
> > > > > > > subclass = UART
> > > > > > > bar [10] = type Memory, range 32
= 'Exar Corp.'
> > > > > > device = 'XR17C/D152 Dual PCI UART'
> > > > > > class = simple comms
> > > > > > subclass = UART
> > > > > > bar [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xe895, size 102
x27;Exar Corp.'
> > > > > device = 'XR17C/D152 Dual PCI UART'
> > > > > class = simple comms
> > > > > subclass = UART
> > > > > bar [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xe895, size 1024
0x015213a8
> > > > rev=0x02 hdr=0x00
> > > > vendor = 'Exar Corp.'
> > > > device = 'XR17C/D152 Dual PCI UART'
> > > > class = simple comms
> > > > subclass = UART
> > > >
applies, but it doesnt compile on RELENG_8
>
> Ugh, looks like the offset can't handle 0x200, try this instead:
>
> Index: pucdata.c
> ===
Thanks! that applies cleanly and I see both ports now. However, I s
On Friday, May 27, 2011 3:38:04 pm Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 5/27/2011 3:33 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > Actually, can you just try this:
> >
> > Index: pucdata.c
>
> Hi,
> Patch applies, but it doesnt compile on RELENG_8
Ugh, looks like the offset can't handle 0x200, try this instead:
On 5/27/2011 3:33 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> Actually, can you just try this:
>
> Index: pucdata.c
Hi,
Patch applies, but it doesnt compile on RELENG_8
patch < p
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|Index: pucdata.c
|=
uot;Oxford Semiconductor OXCB950 Cardbus
> 16950 UART",
> 0x10, 16384000 },
> { 0x151f, 0x, 0x, 0, "TOPIC Semiconductor TP560 56k modem", 0x10 },
> +{ 0x13a8, 0x0152, 0x2205, 0x2028, "MultiTech MultiModem ZPX", 0x10,
> + 8 * DEFAULT_RC
uot;Oxford Semiconductor OXCB950 Cardbus
> 16950 UART",
> 0x10, 16384000 },
> { 0x151f, 0x, 0x, 0, "TOPIC Semiconductor TP560 56k modem", 0x10 },
> +{ 0x13a8, 0x0152, 0x2205, 0x2028, "MultiTech MultiModem ZPX", 0x10,
> + 8 * DEFAULT_RC
24 17:10:21.0 -0400
+++ uart_bus_pci.c 2011-05-27 10:49:05.0 -0400
@@ -110,6 +110,8 @@
{ 0x1415, 0x950b, 0x, 0, "Oxford Semiconductor OXCB950 Cardbus
16950 UART",
0x10, 16384000 },
{ 0x151f, 0x, 0x, 0, "TOPIC Semiconductor TP560 56k modem"
speed /
8
> > as the speed to '-s'.)
> >
> > Also, is your card a modem or a dual-port card?
>
> If I add in the device IDs, I am not able to talk to it at any speed.
> However, the port that is exposed, might just not be echoing back chars
> and the second por
On 5/27/2011 8:05 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> Oh, hmm, looks like the clock has an unusual multiplier. Does it work if you
> use 'cu -l -s 1200' to talk at 9600 for example? (In general use speed / 8
> as the speed to '-s'.)
>
> Also, is your card a modem
> > > bar [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xe895, size 1024,
> > > enabled
> > >
> > >
> > > NetBSD supposedly has support for this card
> >
> > Oh, hmm, looks like the clock has an unusual multiplier. Does it work if
>
e comms
> > subclass = UART
> > bar [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xe895, size 1024, enabled
> >
> >
> > NetBSD supposedly has support for this card
>
> Oh, hmm, looks like the clock has an unusual multiplier. Does it work if you
> use &
On 5/27/2011 8:05 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> Oh, hmm, looks like the clock has an unusual multiplier. Does it work if you
> use 'cu -l -s 1200' to talk at 9600 for example? (In general use speed / 8
> as the speed to '-s'.)
>
> Also, is your card a mode
clock has an unusual multiplier. Does it work if you
use 'cu -l -s 1200' to talk at 9600 for example? (In general use speed / 8
as the speed to '-s'.)
Also, is your card a modem or a dual-port card?
--
John Baldwin
__
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 04:58:37PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 5/26/2011 4:12 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, can you get 'pciconf -lb' output?
> >
> > Hmm, wow, I wonder how uart(4) works at all. It tries to reuse it's softc
> > structure in uart_bus_attach() that was setup in uart_bus_
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 5:20:37 am Willy Offermans wrote:
> > > > Dear FreeBSD friends,
> > > >
> > > > I need support with a MultiTech modem, MT9234ZPX-PCIE-NV
> > > > (http://www.multitech.com/en_US/PRODUCTS/Families/
On 5/26/2011 4:12 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> Hmm, can you get 'pciconf -lb' output?
>
> Hmm, wow, I wonder how uart(4) works at all. It tries to reuse it's softc
> structure in uart_bus_attach() that was setup in uart_bus_probe(). Since it
> doesn't return 0 from its probe routine, that is for
> > I need support with a MultiTech modem, MT9234ZPX-PCIE-NV
> > > (http://www.multitech.com/en_US/PRODUCTS/Families/MultiModemZPX/)
> > >
> > > The modem is recognised during the boot event:
> > >
> > >
> > > pci6: at device 0.0 (no
Dear John and FreeBSD friends,
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:36:30PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, May 21, 2011 5:20:37 am Willy Offermans wrote:
> > Dear FreeBSD friends,
> >
> > I need support with a MultiTech modem, MT9234ZPX-PCIE-NV
> > (http://www.m
On Saturday, May 21, 2011 5:20:37 am Willy Offermans wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD friends,
>
> I need support with a MultiTech modem, MT9234ZPX-PCIE-NV
> (http://www.multitech.com/en_US/PRODUCTS/Families/MultiModemZPX/)
>
> The modem is recognised during the boot event:
>
>
&g
On 25/05/2011, at 16:04, Willy Offermans wrote:
> I'm using FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p2. I have enclosed the dmesg.boot file.
>
> puc was already incorporated into the kernel:
>
> kosmos# kldload -v puc
> kldload: can't load puc: File exists
>
> So I assume puc has already been loaded.
You could tr
On 25/05/2011, at 16:10, Willy Offermans wrote:
> According to the manufacturer
> (http://www.multitech.com/en_US/PRODUCTS/Families/MultiModemZPX/)
> it is not a soft modem, but a ``hardware'' modem. It says: Built-in
> processor does the work, so your computer doesn'
Dear Daniel and FreeBSD friends,
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 10:48:03AM +0200, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 22/05/2011, at 9:16, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >> However, as the boot process already mentions, there is no driver attached
> >> and I cannot get the modem t
Hello Jeremy and FreeBSD friends,
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 12:16:42AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:20:37AM +0200, Willy Offermans wrote:
> > Dear FreeBSD friends,
> >
> > I need support with a MultiTech modem, MT9234ZPX-PCIE-NV
> > (htt
On 22/05/2011, at 9:16, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> However, as the boot process already mentions, there is no driver attached
>> and I cannot get the modem to appear as an accessible and functional
>> device. Is there someone, who can help me to get this modem to work?
>
>
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:20:37AM +0200, Willy Offermans wrote:
> Dear FreeBSD friends,
>
> I need support with a MultiTech modem, MT9234ZPX-PCIE-NV
> (http://www.multitech.com/en_US/PRODUCTS/Families/MultiModemZPX/)
>
> The modem is recognised during the boot event:
>
Dear FreeBSD friends,
I need support with a MultiTech modem, MT9234ZPX-PCIE-NV
(http://www.multitech.com/en_US/PRODUCTS/Families/MultiModemZPX/)
The modem is recognised during the boot event:
pci6: at device 0.0 (no driver attached)
and also appears in the list of found hardware over the
Wednesday 18 of May 2011 14:13:00 crsnet.pl napisał(a):
> >> No.
> >> I check with minicom that AT+CFUN=1 (Turns modem on) give Error but
> >> AT+PCSTATE=1 turns it on.
> >> Unfortunately when i change it in ppp.conf from AT+CFUN=1 to
> >> AT+PCST
No.
I check with minicom that AT+CFUN=1 (Turns modem on) give Error but
AT+PCSTATE=1 turns it on.
Unfortunately when i change it in ppp.conf from AT+CFUN=1 to
AT+PCSTATE=1 that give me
May 18 12:13:48 x60s ppp[2697]: tun0: Chat: Send: AT+PCSTATE=1^M
May 18 12:13:48 x60s ppp[2697]: tun0
Wednesday 18 of May 2011 12:22:37 crsnet.pl napisał(a):
> On Wed, 18 May 2011 12:05:20 +0200, Maciej Milewski
>
> wrote:
> > Dnia środa, 18 maja 2011 o 11:40:36 crsnet.pl napisał(a):
> >> Hello.
> >> Have here anyone run this modem/GPS under FreeBSD 8.2 ? Mo
Wednesday 18 of May 2011 12:22:37 crsnet.pl napisał(a):
> On Wed, 18 May 2011 12:05:20 +0200, Maciej Milewski
>
> wrote:
> > Dnia środa, 18 maja 2011 o 11:40:36 crsnet.pl napisał(a):
> >> Hello.
> >> Have here anyone run this modem/GPS under FreeBSD 8.2 ? Mo
Dnia środa, 18 maja 2011 o 11:40:36 crsnet.pl napisał(a):
> Hello.
> Have here anyone run this modem/GPS under FreeBSD 8.2 ? Modem is
> recognized, but when i try to run ppp -ddial iplus i get this error :
>
> /var/log/messages
> May 18 11:20:59 x60s ppp[1656]: tun0: Wa
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:40:36AM +0200, crsnet.pl wrote:
> Hello.
> Have here anyone run this modem/GPS under FreeBSD 8.2 ? Modem is
> recognized, but when i try to run ppp -ddial iplus i get this error
> :
>
> /var/log/messages
> May 18 11:20:59 x60s ppp[1656]: tun0:
On Wed, 18 May 2011 12:05:20 +0200, Maciej Milewski
wrote:
Dnia środa, 18 maja 2011 o 11:40:36 crsnet.pl napisał(a):
Hello.
Have here anyone run this modem/GPS under FreeBSD 8.2 ? Modem is
recognized, but when i try to run ppp -ddial iplus i get this error
:
/var/log/messages
May 18 11
Hello.
Have here anyone run this modem/GPS under FreeBSD 8.2 ? Modem is
recognized, but when i try to run ppp -ddial iplus i get this error :
/var/log/messages
May 18 11:20:59 x60s ppp[1656]: tun0: Warning: Chat script failed
/var/log/ppp
May 18 11:20:53 x60s ppp[1656]: tun0: Phase: deflink
the other. It doesn't work like that. :-)
Isn't the reason for different dial-in and dial-out devices that this
should work? Or does that only work with modem?
You can't with two directly connected machines. When the two are
physically wired together, and getty is configured (via
e reason for different dial-in and dial-out devices that this
should work? Or does that only work with modem?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/serial.html#ACCESS-SERIAL-PORTS
Nicolas
--
http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas
___
freebsd-st
;ve made some tests with my machines and a couple of null modem cables,
> and
> > here's what I've got.
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 08:46:48AM +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote:
>
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 08:36:51AM +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 21.01.2010 at 11:37:06 +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote:
> > > Here's what I did:
> > >
> > > box1 COM1/ttyd0 -> box2
In message <717f7a3e1001210137p7884adcbxc66a4f7fff928...@mail.gmail.com>,
Marin Atanasov (dna...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello Jeremy,
>
> Now I'm a little confused :)
>
> I've made some tests with my machines and a couple of null modem cables, and
> here&#x
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Thu, 21.01.2010 at 11:37:06 +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote:
> > Here's what I did:
> >
> > box1 COM1/ttyd0 -> box2 COM1/ttyd0 -> using null modem cable
> > box1 COM2/ttyd1 -> box3 COM1/ttyd0 -&
On Thu, 21.01.2010 at 11:37:06 +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote:
> Here's what I did:
>
> box1 COM1/ttyd0 -> box2 COM1/ttyd0 -> using null modem cable
> box1 COM2/ttyd1 -> box3 COM1/ttyd0 -> using null modem cable
>
> On box1 I have this in /etc/ttys:
>
Hello Jeremy,
Now I'm a little confused :)
I've made some tests with my machines and a couple of null modem cables, and
here's what I've got.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 08:46:48AM +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote:
>
erial cable will start seeing "login:" and so on
assuming you attach to the serial port there.
For example:
box1 COM1/ttyu0 is wired to box2 COM3/ttyu2 using a null modem cable.
box1 COM2/ttyu1 is wired to box2 COM4/ttyu3 using a null modem cable.
On box1, you'd have something like
orodov wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:14:44 +0200 Marin Atanasov wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'm thinking about the following situation - 1 system acting like a
>>> host
>>> > with a serial port hub, each port of the hub is connected to a
2010 at 7:04 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:14:44 +0200 Marin Atanasov wrote:
> I'm thinking about the following situation - 1 system acting like a
host
> with a serial port hub, each port of the hub is connected to a
different
> machine on sio0, using n
Yeap, that makes sense :)
Thank you, I'm gonna try it as soon as I get that device :)
Thanks again,
Marin
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 08:34:17AM +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote:
> > Thank you a lot for your feedback!
> >
> > Now to the real ques
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 08:34:17AM +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote:
> Thank you a lot for your feedback!
>
> Now to the real question again, because I'm a little confused now - can I
> still get a usb-to-serial port converter having let's say 8 serial ports and
> then connect each machine to the usb-t
200 Marin Atanasov wrote:
>
> > I'm thinking about the following situation - 1 system acting like a host
> > with a serial port hub, each port of the hub is connected to a different
> > machine on sio0, using null modem cables.
>
> Along with milti-io serial cards w
On 2010-Jan-12 08:08:16 -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
[serial to TCP/IP adapters]
>As far as present-day devices go, the ones I can recommend are the
...
>
>You can also consider looking for used hardware -- either Xyplex devices
DECservers are good for this sort of thing as well. AFAIK we're st
about the following situation - 1 system acting like a host
with a serial port hub, each port of the hub is connected to a different
machine on sio0, using null modem cables.
Along with milti-io serial cards we use multi-usb serial
converters, such as SUNIX UTS7009P (7 USB to serial adapter):
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 17:14 +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I'd like to ask you about the following - is it possible to have multiple
> serial consoles coming from a single host?
>
> What I am talking about is connecting multiple machines using a null modem
t;I'm thinking about the following situation - 1 system acting like a host
> >>>with a serial port hub, each port of the hub is connected to a different
> >>>machine on sio0, using null modem cables.
> >>
> >>Along with milti-io serial cards we
ed to a different
machine on sio0, using null modem cables.
Along with milti-io serial cards we use multi-usb serial
converters, such as SUNIX UTS7009P (7 USB to serial adapter):
http://www.sunix.com.tw/it/en/LinkCraft/UTS4009P_UTS7009P.htm
I need to look it up when I'm in front of a rea
null modem cables.
Along with milti-io serial cards we use multi-usb serial
converters, such as SUNIX UTS7009P (7 USB to serial adapter):
http://www.sunix.com.tw/it/en/LinkCraft/UTS4009P_UTS7009P.htm
I need to look it up when I'm in front of a real computer, but there
are a number of
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:14:44 +0200 Marin Atanasov wrote:
> I'm thinking about the following situation - 1 system acting like a host
> with a serial port hub, each port of the hub is connected to a different
> machine on sio0, using null modem cables.
Along with milti-io serial card
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:08:16 -0800
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Yes this is possible with FreeBSD -- but you'll need to purchase a
And easy enough with conserver[1] and conserver-com[2] in ports.
No reason to exclude FreeBSD from this task. :)
References:
1) http://www.freshports.org/comms/conserv
ch to route the traffic to the corresponding port (whether the cable
needs to be null modem or not wil depend on the switch itself).
What I am talking about is connecting multiple machines using a null modem
> cable - I know it is possible only to connect two machines and they need to
> be
t;> What I am talking about is connecting multiple machines using a null modem
>> cable - I know it is possible only to connect two machines and they need to
>> be connected on sio0 (COM1).
>>
>> I'm thinking about the following situation - 1 system acting like a host
&g
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:14:44PM +0200, Marin Atanasov wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I'd like to ask you about the following - is it possible to have multiple
> serial consoles coming from a single host?
>
> What I am talking about is connecting multiple machines using a
Hello there,
I'd like to ask you about the following - is it possible to have multiple
serial consoles coming from a single host?
What I am talking about is connecting multiple machines using a null modem
cable - I know it is possible only to connect two machines and they need to
be connect
Exemys wrote:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> This is a message in multipart MIME format. Your mail client should
> not be displaying this. Consider upgrading your mail client to view
> this message correctly.
Come again?
Alphons
--
All right, that does it Bill [Donahue].
This is a message in multipart MIME format. Your mail client should not be
displaying this. Consider upgrading your mail client to view this message
correctly.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
-0500, Ben Hacker Jr wrote:
Dear Sir,
I am attempting to get a Broad Band Modem working on:
sony# uname -a
FreeBSD sony.family.hom 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #2:
Tue Dec 19 16:55:50 EST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SONY01 i386
The device is a Sprint PC57
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 03:45:25PM -0500, Ben Hacker Jr wrote:
>
> Dear Sir,
>
> I am attempting to get a Broad Band Modem working on:
>
>sony# uname -a
>FreeBSD sony.family.hom 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #2:
>Tue Dec 19 16:55:50 EST 2006
>
Dear Sir,
I am attempting to get a Broad Band Modem working on:
sony# uname -a
FreeBSD sony.family.hom 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #2:
Tue Dec 19 16:55:50 EST 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SONY01 i386
The device is a Sprint PC5740 pc card. When I
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 17:20, Oleg Dambaev wrote:
> > Two questions
> > 1) Is cuad0 the correct port? Have you tried cuad1?
> > 2) What baud rate are you using? (the -s flag)
>
> Good way to try *first*:
> 0. man stty
> 1. use tip instead cu
I prefer cu - you just specify the baud rate and
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 13:15, Sun Zongjun-E5739C wrote:
I run the command on device running FreeBSD 6.1
Test# cu -l /dev/cuad0
Connected
There is no response on the FreeBSD except the "Connected" string. Such
string can occur even there is no cable available.
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 13:15, Sun Zongjun-E5739C wrote:
> I run the command on device running FreeBSD 6.1
>
> Test# cu -l /dev/cuad0
> Connected
>
> There is no response on the FreeBSD except the "Connected" string. Such
> string can occur even there is no cable available.
>
> What happens
S1:23:respawn:/sbin/agetty -L ttyS0 115200, 9600 vt100
That is OK.
Thanks a lot
Best Regards
Sun Zongjun
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Koshy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2006年10月11日 12:02
To: Sun Zongjun-E5739C
Subject: Re: How to connects to Linux machine via null-modem cable a
HI, all
I am a newbie to FreeBSD. I want to connect one my pc running FreeBSD
6.1 to another PC running Fedora core 5 via a null modem cable.
I can login the PC running the Fedora Core 5 from PC running Windows via
one NULL modem cable.
When I connect the two serial ports of two pc, one
Hello!
I am running FreeBSD 6-STABLE (last update 14.5.06) on a Fujitsu Siemens
Amilo A notebook. This machine has internet access via kppp and a
Creative ModemBlaster V.92 serial modem.
Sometimes when surfing on the internet (most times with Opera 8.51
AFAIR) the system completly locks up and
often is the mtu value between your machine and your internet provider
/r/
wlodek
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> Dear list!
> For a month or two I will be connected
> to cable net. So, I tried it on another
> location and... did not work. Laptop
> has 6.0 and "rl". I used empty dhclent.
> conf and then populated it with every
> option I found on the net. Firewall
> got no traffic, the packet was not leaving
Dear list!
For a month or two I will be connected
to cable net. So, I tried it on another
location and... did not work. Laptop
has 6.0 and "rl". I used empty dhclent.
conf and then populated it with every
option I found on the net. Firewall
got no traffic, the packet was not leaving
the box. When a
On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 22:10, Павел Е. Черкаев wrote:
> console:
> ucom0: Qualcomm, Incorporated Qualcomm CDMA Technologies MSM, rev
> 1.01/0.00, addr 2, iclass 2/2
> ucom0: data interface 1, has CM over data, has break
> ucom0: could not set data multiplex mode
> device_attach: ucom0 attach returned 6
FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0:
what i can add to my kernel configuration ?
I need this modem :(
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
From: "Oliver Fromme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: internal modem / pnp0 / FAQ error ?
>
> If ltmdm doesn't support your winmodem, then it's pretty
> much a dead horse. I would rather recommend to buy a real
> modem.
>
>
thanks for the reply
I
pan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.html
>
> 4.5.2. Why is FreeBSD not finding my internal Plug & Play modem?
>
> You will need to add the modem's PnP ID to the PnP ID list in the serial
> d
From:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.html
4.5.2. Why is FreeBSD not finding my internal Plug & Play modem?
You will need to add the modem's PnP ID to the PnP ID list in the serial
driver. To enable Plug & Play support, compile a new kernel with controlle
[cc'ing to FreeBSD-Stable]
Hi,
I know that the proposed patches I submitted are not the best patches, but
given that the next release of RELENG_4 is coming out, would it not be
better to commit those to RELENG_4 as they allow the modem to work when it
shares an interrupt with another d
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 01:56:09 -0700 (MST), M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: wrote:
:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : I posted the same text a
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 01:56:09 -0700 (MST), M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I posted the same text as below to current@ on 20 Oct, but got no
answer.
: Is there somebody here who knows more about this
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ronald Klop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I posted the same text as below to current@ on 20 Oct, but got no answer.
: Is there somebody here who knows more about this or can tell me where to
: look further?
: I got a 'me too' message from somebody who g
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Zoran Kolic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Hi all!
: Don't wonna make stupid
: quiestions, but this is
: something I have to know
: to make reclamation if neces-
: sary.
: After 5-10 minutes of inter-
: net connection, when detached,
: m
m.
Ronald.
--- original mail below ---
My laptop will not recognize my pccard modem and pccard ethernet if I
insert them both.
When I only insert my modem it detects:
Oct 19 21:34:13 laptop kernel: pccard0: Allocation failed for cfe 15
Oct 19 21:34:13 laptop kernel: sio4: at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 11
Zoran Kolic said:
> Hi all!
> Don't wonna make stupid
> quiestions, but this is
> something I have to know
> to make reclamation if neces-
> sary.
> After 5-10 minutes of inter-
> net connection, when detached,
> my pccard modem is hot as fur-
> nace. I can
Hi all!
Don't wonna make stupid
quiestions, but this is
something I have to know
to make reclamation if neces-
sary.
After 5-10 minutes of inter-
net connection, when detached,
my pccard modem is hot as fur-
nace. I can barely take it in
my hand. Is it normal beha-
veour?
Model is Zoltrix
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 08:58:32AM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
>Dear FreeBSD!
>Hope that someone on the list has
> expirience with external Zoltrix modem
> named Rainbow. It should change my
> nightmare: lucent winmodem. Maker
> has a lot of data about windows com-
> pab
Dear FreeBSD!
Hope that someone on the list has
expirience with external Zoltrix modem
named Rainbow. It should change my
nightmare: lucent winmodem. Maker
has a lot of data about windows com-
pability, but freeBSD is not even men-
tioned. Should I buy it? (Modem on the
machine? Yes, gonna
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
