Hi people, (and thanks Alan for copying me in)
On 2018-12-17 01:42, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 04:35:32PM -0500, Alex McKeever wrote:
I ran into problems compiling the CDE in FreeBSD 12.0 RC3 (PowerPC)
on my eMac.
I don't know of anyone else who has tried to run it.
The serv
Cassiano Peixoto wrote:
Ok I know about HANDLE_RC_SCRIPTS, it's a good approach. But how to deal
with when I need to restart a service without upgrading? Reaper
functionnality is a trouble for many administrators who made meta ports to
manage their servers. I really think it could be a option to
On 27 January 2013 20:25, wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was used FreeBSD 9.1 Release since December 2012, I usually use
> "portsnap fetch && update" and "portmaster-a" to keep my system updated.
> Two weeks ago unexpectedly "named" not worked. this is my case:
>
> "Problem:
> root@server:/etc # /etc/rc.d/nam
On 21 Apr 2013 17:19, "Zoran Kolic" wrote:
>
> I had usb switch to share keyboard and mouse for two nodes, of
> which freebsd worked flawlessly, but openbsd disconnected quite
> often and made a lot of antics in X. After all, I dismembered
> the configuration and now I have 2 kb-s and 2 mice. A lo
On 10 April 2013 15:59, wrote:
> Got it. I'll double check to make sure everything was recompiled
> correctly. Thanks!
> Damon
While you're at it, I'll echo Ronald's concern-- make sure
/usr/include/utmp.h does NOT exist for you.
If it does, you must run make delete-old in /usr/src.
Chris
> O
On 17 Mar 2013 12:07, "Daniel O'Connor" wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I recently updated my 9.1-PRE system's ports and my previous X config now
results in no mouse (but the keyboard does work).
>
> I found that I needed to add the following..
> Section "ServerFlags"
> Option "AllowEmptyInput" "Fal
On 9 March 2013 09:37, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> I try to compile port lang/ruby19 and I always get on a FreeBSD
> 9.1-STABLE box the following error message, which is obviously triggered
> by some port auditing - but I do not find the "knob" to switch it off.
>
> Can someone give a hint, please?
I g
On 27 February 2013 21:19, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to get my sound working, and long story short: rc.d/sysctl parses
> sysctl.conf wrongly if there are sysctls of the form
>
> mib=val1=val2
>
> which is what you need for sound. For reference I needed/wanted
>
> dev.hdaa.4.nid25
On 21 Feb 2013 02:23, "Greg Miller" wrote:
>
> On 2/20/13, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > What is your point, besides getting software from the museum to build
> > stuff from the relative future?
>
> I can't speak for the OP, but I tried it because clang, gcc46, and
> gcc47 wouldn't produce a working
Somehow attribution has been screwed here-- I will perhaps blame the
appalling Android Gmail app that I used to reply to an earlier
message.
On 19 February 2013 18:54, Mikhail T. wrote:
> These were, indeed, complaints, but not about the port "not working after I
> broke it". My complaint is th
On 19 Feb 2013 14:23, "Mikhail T." wrote:
>
> 18.02.2013 15:26, Chris Rees написав(ла):
>>
>> I'm sure you understand that our compiler in base is rather elderly,
>> and that a project as insanely huge as Libreoffice is going to be
>> highly sensitive
On 14 February 2013 13:57, Mikhail T. wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I just finished building editors/libreoffice with gcc-4.2.1 -- had to
> edit the port's Makefile to prevent it from picking a different
> compiler. Everything built and installed, but libreoffice dies on
> start-up (right after flashing the
On 16 February 2013 18:08, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 05:38:56PM +0000, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 16 February 2013 17:05, Paul Mather wrote:
>> > On Feb 16, 2013, at 4:21 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at
On 16 February 2013 17:05, Paul Mather wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2013, at 4:21 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:23:33PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>>> 16.02.2013 01:32, Jeremy Chadwick ??:
>>>
Follow up -- I read Alfred's most recent mail. Lo and behold, I find
On 16 Feb 2013 09:21, "Jeremy Chadwick" wrote:
> I do not know who maintains the rc(8) and rc.subr(8) framework, but
> they've got their work cut out for them.
That's an interesting comment Care to guess at the obvious answer? :)
No-one actively maintains the infrastructure, though there are
On 8 February 2013 20:42, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> Wiadomość napisana przez Eitan Adler w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 20:05:
>> On 8 February 2013 13:46, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
>>> Wiadomość napisana przez Harald Schmalzbauer w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz.
>>> 16:08:
Hello,
>>
On 3 February 2013 17:15, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>
> Am 03.02.2013 um 10:57 schrieb Chris Rees :
>
>> On 3 February 2013 03:55, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>>>
>>> There is no PR yet with my fix and therefor no commit to ports tree
>>> that would fix the pr
On 3 February 2013 03:55, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:53:03AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
>>> I'm not sure why I'm being jumped on in this weeks old report of a
>>> now-fixed problem.
>>
>> I'm sorry, I'm that far behind
On 25 Jan 2013 18:28, "Dimitry Andric" wrote:
>
> On 2013-01-25 16:41, Chris Rees wrote:
> ...
>
>> I've just created devel/subversion-static that will be available by
pkg_add
>> once the package builds are back.
>
>
> Thanks, but the port does not
On 25 Jan 2013 10:27, "Marin Atanasov Nikolov" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Bob Bishop wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 25 Jan 2013, at 09:29, Marin Atanasov Nikolov wrote:
> >
> > > Hello again :)
> > >
> > > Here's my update on these spontaneous reboots after less than a week
> > sin
On 25 Jan 2013 13:39, "Ian Smith" wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:57:17 -0800, 'Jeremy Chadwick' wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:34:33PM +1100, Dewayne wrote:
> > > The objective is to return to a base build of FreeBSD that performs
> > > the expected task of being able to pull source
On 23 Jan 2013 21:55, "Jeremy Chadwick" wrote:
>
> (Please keep me CC'd as I'm not subscribed to the list)
>
> > Great idea;
> >
> > http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/svn-static.diff
> >
> > Lev, do you mind if I commit this? I haven't touched the subversion
> > port, but it'll have you as m
On 24 Jan 2013 14:33, "John Mehr" wrote:
>>
>> For testing against svn.freebsd.org -- this is pull only? So you only
>> need read permissions on svn.freebsd.org? That's fine: the SVN
>> repository is open to public access and you can just use it without
>> asking permission. Although I'd use one
On 23 Jan 2013 21:45, "Lev Serebryakov" wrote:
>
> Hello, Chris.
> You wrote 24 января 2013 г., 1:25:44:
>
> CR> Great idea;
> CR> http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/svn-static.diff
> I think, adding SERF or NEON (what is smaller) is good idea, or this
> build will lack http support, and it c
On 23 January 2013 19:17, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> devel/subversion already has an option to build a static version. A
> solution could be to create a stub port (devel/subversion-static)
> similar to:
>
> shells/bash-devel
> shells/bash-static-devel
>
> dns/ldns
> dns/py-ldns
Great idea;
http://ww
On 23 January 2013 20:41, Isaac (.ike) Levy wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
>> Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> in ancient times there was cvsup. cvsup was a PITA if you wanted (or
>>> needed) to install it via ports, the only reasonable way was to use
>>> pkg
On 23 Jan 2013 15:37, "Oliver Brandmueller" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 04:12:22PM +0100, Frank Staals wrote:
> > This type of question has been asked quite a few times recently. At this
> > point there is no svn version of csup, however there were people working
> > on it (or at least: the
On 4 Jan 2013 09:25, "Erich Dollansky" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 09:38:05 +0100
> "Patrick M. Hausen" wrote:
>
> > Am 03.01.2013 um 19:21 schrieb Matthew Seaman
> > :
> > > On 03/01/2013 17:48, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> > >> I'm a bit reluctant to installing svn on every system that
On 2 January 2013 16:05, Derek Kulinski wrote:
> Eitan Adler wrote:
>
>>On 2 January 2013 06:26, Chris Rees wrote:
>>> To clarify, no-one wants to remove CVS completely, the suggestion was
>>to
>>> move it out of the base system.
>>
>>As the
On 2 Jan 2013 11:08, "Thomas Mueller" wrote:
>
> > There has been some discussion about removing CVS from the base system
> > now it is no longer used. No concensus was reached, so it's not going
> > away immediately (and would not be removed from 9.x or earlier branches
> > in any case).
>
> > C
On 1 Jan 2013 00:01, "Dominic Fandrey" wrote:
>
> I have a Tinderbox that I just updated to the current RELENG_9.
> Following the update build times for packages have increased by a
> factor between 5 and 20. I.e. I have packages that used to build in
> 5 minutes and now take an hour.
>
> I'm susp
On 31 Dec 2012 20:40, "Chris H" wrote:
>
> Greetings Chris, and thank you for your reply.
> > On 31 Dec 2012 19:52, "Chris H" wrote:
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >> The following is hijacked from another thread, which prompts me to
> >> post this question:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:49:06A
On 31 Dec 2012 19:52, "Chris H" wrote:
>
> Greetings,
> The following is hijacked from another thread, which prompts me to
> post this question:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:49:06AM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
wrote:
> >> (Not sure if this is the right mailing list, but here goes.)
> >>
>
On 23 December 2012 16:23, Barney Wolff wrote:
[moving Barney's top post down]
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 10:51:24AM -0500, Mikhail T. wrote:
>> On 23.12.2012 03:05, Charlie Root wrote:
>> > Checking negative group permissions:
>> > 8903027 -rw--w-r-- 1 miwww794277 Oct 23 07:47:45 2007
On 23 Dec 2012 06:40, "Adrian Chadd" wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Would someone please file a PR for this? This is a huge unused
> allocation of memory for something that honestly likely shouldn't have
> been included by default in GENERIC.
>
> I've cc'ed ken on a reply to this. Hopefully after the hol
On 19 Dec 2012 09:47, "Volodymyr Kostyrko" wrote:
>
> 19.12.2012 01:22, Peter Wemm:
>
>>> I would be very much be willing to assist with seeding if we make dht
>>> torrent files available from my nodes located in downtown Los Angeles
>>> for west-coast and APAC network presence.
>>>
>>> as an asid
On 18 Dec 2012 19:44, "Eitan Adler" wrote:
>
> On 18 December 2012 03:59, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>
> > So what is the reason for this?
>
> The software used to seed the torrents was horribly insecure. This
> was found *prior* to the security incident.
What software?
Chris
On 26 Nov 2012 08:12, "Perry Hutchison" wrote:
>
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> > ... don't bet that csup and cvs will be around long ...
> > It's really time to get away from CVS and I suspect
> > it will be going away sooner than had been planned.
>
> Once csup goes away, how will a base-only syste
On 18 Nov 2012 09:49, "Andrea Venturoli" wrote:
>
> On 11/17/12 21:04, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>>> Looks like everything is back up again.
>>> Thanks for the good work.
>>
>>
>> Yes, but don't bet that csup and cvs will be around long.
>
>
> I'm aware of this and I'm (adimttedly slowly) moving away
On 12 Nov 2012 15:35, "Kurt Buff" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> >
> > On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, "Kurt Buff" wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> >> > It might
On 12 Nov 2012 08:55, "Paul Schenkeveld" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 08:29:27AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> > On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, "Kurt Buff" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> > > > It m
On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, "Kurt Buff" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> > It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's
> > any difference. Are those 3 line the same?
> >
> > WITH_KMS=YES
> > WITH_KMS="YES"
> > WITH_KMS=yes
>
> With regard to their use in /etc/
On 4 Nov 2012 20:12, "George Mitchell" wrote:
>
> On 11/04/12 14:59, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
>>
>> TB --- 2012-11-04 19:53:34 - tinderbox 2.9 running on
freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
>> TB --- 2012-11-04 19:53:34 - FreeBSD freebsd-stable.sentex.ca 8.3-STABLE
FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #0: Tue Oct 16 17:37:58
On 24 Sep 2012 12:26, "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" wrote:
>
> Chris Rees writes:
> > Have you tried using http:// ?
>
> Both should work, but svn is significantly faster.
Yes, that's why I tried it instead, but my point is that you may need to
sleep a bit between tri
On 24 Sep 2012 10:23, "Dag-Erling Smørgrav" wrote:
>
> I recently switched the machine that builds 7 and 8 from csup to svn.
> Unfortunately, it seems to have trouble maintaining a stable connection
> to svn.freebsd.org. I'm testing a patch that makes it retry up to three
> times before giving up
On 12 Sep 2012 07:19, "Christer Solskogen"
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Mark Linimon
wrote:
>
> > For most of the failures, we are already aware of them, as a result of
> > our periodic runs. So, just filing a PR to say "broken on clang"
doesn't
> > really help us all that much.
>
On 28/08/2012, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
> Jim Pingle writes:
>
>> On 8/23/2012 11:43 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 11:17 -0400, Ken Menzel wrote:
I found two good primers:
http://mebsd.com/configure-freebsd-servers/update-freebsd-source-tree-using-subversion-svn.ht
On 10 August 2012 12:28, Marcelo Gondim wrote:
> Em 10/08/2012 08:10, Denis Granato escreveu:
>
>> Good morning guys.
>>
>> I installed sucessfully a postgresql 9.2 beta 2 last month in
>> databases/postgresql92-server
>>
>> But yesterday in another server ai update my ports tree and this change t
On 21 July 2012 18:04, Daniel Braniss wrote:
>> On 21 July 2012 10:36, Daniel Braniss wrote:
>> > hi, lsof on freebsd 9.1:
>> > COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
>> > ntpd1707 root cwd unknown file
>> > system type: ne
On 21 July 2012 10:36, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> hi, lsof on freebsd 9.1:
> COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME
> ntpd1707 root cwd unknown file
> system type: newnfs
> ntpd1707 root rtd
On 15 June 2012 18:53, Etienne Robillard wrote:
> On 06/15/2012 01:08 PM, Jerry wrote:
>>
>> Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of
>> getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only
>> 2.x.
>
>
>
> Why not? Thinking FreeBSD could become immune to remot
On Jun 12, 2012 10:48 AM, "H" wrote:
>
> On Monday 11 June 2012 20:59 Chuck Swiger wrote:
> > Hi, Dave--
> >
> > On Jun 11, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Dave Hayes wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > > Do I have this wrong? Anyone see a problem with this picture?
> > > What can we do to "just upgrade" in a safe fashi
On 10 June 2012 18:10, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 06/10/12 17:43, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
>> On 06/10/12 09:54, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
>>> Am Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:37:09 +0100
>>> schrieb Chris Rees:
>>>
>>>> Er... people always test their c
On 10 June 2012 11:51, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 06/10/12 12:37, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 10 June 2012 11:12, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
>>> Am Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:09:09 +0700
>>> schrieb Adam Strohl :
>>>
>>>> I get the feeling people are upd
On 10 June 2012 11:12, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
> Am Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:09:09 +0700
> schrieb Adam Strohl :
>
>> I get the feeling people are updating their ports tree and then
>> recompiling/reinstalling everything "just because" and then are
>> complaining when one thing breaks (its the only thi
On 6 June 2012 14:12, Erich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06 June 2012 8:48:10 Chris Rees wrote:
>> On Jun 6, 2012 3:38 AM, "Erich" wrote:
>> >
>
>> No it doesn't. It states clearly that you shouldn't use tags unless you
>> know what you are doi
On Jun 6, 2012 3:38 AM, "Erich" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 05 June 2012 7:13:47 Mark Linimon wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 03:23:01PM +0700, Erich wrote:
> > > But is this true for apache only or for the whole ports tree?
> >
> > Entire tree.
>
> my problem with this is that the documentation stat
On Jun 5, 2012 3:07 AM, "Erich" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 05 June 2012 11:24:25 Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
>
> > Version tagging is just a convient way to get a snapshot at a
> > particular point in time unless you create branches that are them
>
> we do not ask for more. There should be only one differe
On 3 June 2012 21:55, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 06/03/12 15:29, Erich wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 03 June 2012 PM 5:14:10 Adam Strohl wrote:
>>> On 6/3/2012 11:14, Erich wrote:
What I really do not understand in this whole discussion is very simple.
Is it just a few people who run into problem
On Jun 4, 2012 9:50 AM, "Dave Hayes" wrote:
>
> Mark Linimon writes:
> > On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 07:24:11PM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote:
> >> I see features and pkgng and things being offered up as solutions...
> >> these are all well and good, but in my opinion more comprehensive
> >> documentation
On Jun 3, 2012 5:26 AM, "Erich" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 02 June 2012 PM 2:56:01 Chris Nehren wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 14:11:06 -0400 , Paul Mather wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what the solution is for the end user. I know I get
> > > somewhat leery of updating my ports if I see a large numbe
On Jun 3, 2012 4:39 AM, "Erich" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 02 June 2012 PM 4:07:23 Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
> > I'll try to be short.
> > I'm using FreeBSD both at servers and as a desktop, but I see
> > struggling of my friends with it in some things.
> >
> > 1. Ports mess. You can very easily render
On 2 June 2012 10:42, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02 June 2012 AM 9:14:28 Chris Rees wrote:
>> On Jun 2, 2012 4:04 AM, "Erich Dollansky"
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > But I have to mention one disadvantage. The ports are in no way linked to
>
On Jun 2, 2012 3:19 PM, "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>
> On 06/02/12 14:47, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 02.06.12 15:32, Erich wrote:
> >> I know that the ports tree is a moving target. But it stops moving
> >> during the release period. This could be used to give a fall back
> >> solution.
> >>
>
On Jun 2, 2012 4:04 AM, "Erich Dollansky"
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 30 May 2012 PM 7:20:31 David Chisnall wrote:
> >
> > This is off-topic, so please feel free to disregard it, but I'm sending
it to this list in the hope that it will reach a largish number of users.
> >
> > I am currently looking at u
On 1 June 2012 16:20, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>> Dear All ,
>>
>> There is a thread
>>
>> "Why Are You Using FreeBSD ?"
>>
>>
>> I think another thread with the specified subject '"Why Are You NOT Using
>> FreeBSD ?" may be useful :
>>
>>
>> If you are NOT using FreeBSD for any area or some areas ,
On 30 May 2012 19:20, David Chisnall wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> This is off-topic, so please feel free to disregard it, but I'm sending it to
> this list in the hope that it will reach a largish number of users.
>
> I am currently looking at updating some of our advocacy material (which
> adverti
On 26 February 2012 11:32, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 26 February 2012 18:16:53 Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 24 February 2012 01:35, Erich Dollansky
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Friday 24 February 2012 01:25:01 Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> >
On 24 February 2012 01:35, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday 24 February 2012 01:25:01 Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>
>> This is NOT a troll.
>> This is NOT a flame.
>> Do NOT hijack this thread to troll/flame.
>>
> allow them some fun too.
>>
>>
>> Now, I find the number of problem reports re
On 14 Jan 2012 08:48, "Andre Goree" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:58:13 -0600, Andre Goree wrote:
>
>> I recently csup'd 9-STABLE and was able to get it working along with my
>> custom kernel. I'm now in the process of rebuilding all my ports, and
I've
>> come across something when running '
On 23 Dec 2011 18:56, "George Kontostanos" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Matthew Seaman
> wrote:
> > On 23/12/2011 18:05, George Kontostanos wrote:
> >> Are all cvs mirror servers updated regarding these changes ?
> >>
> >> ANYBODY
> >
> > Should have by now. Commits usually t
On 15 Dec 2011 21:25, "Kevin Oberman" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> > On 15 December 2011 17:58, O. Hartmann
wrote:
> >> Since ZFS in Linux can only be achieved via FUSE (ad far as I know), it
> >> is legitimate to com
On 15 December 2011 17:58, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Since ZFS in Linux can only be achieved via FUSE (ad far as I know), it
> is legitimate to compare ZFS and ext4. It would be much more competetive
> to compare Linux BTRFS and FreeBSD ZFS.
>
Er... does ext4 guarantee data integrity?
You're not com
On 31 October 2011 04:03, Andrew Lankford wrote:
> I was able to buildworld, buildkernel to 9.0-RC1 from 8-stable without
> incident. Yay. However, I noticed a new sysinstall executable in
> /usr/sbin even though I included WITHOUT_SYSINSTALL="yes" in
> /etc/src.conf. My src.conf looks like
On 14 Oct 2011 21:50, "Stefan Bethke" wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.10.2011 um 14:03 schrieb Jilles Tjoelker:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:25:35PM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 01:27:07AM +0100, Adrian Wontroba wrote:
> >>> I won't be in a position to create a simpler test ca
On 9 October 2011 22:30, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just had my first encounter with the new installer. I chose manual
> partitioning, created a BSD disk (not GPT) with one swap and the rest for /.
> Rest of the installation went fine but then my system didn't boot. I
> repeated everything
Just on case anyone's not on ports@:
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Chris Rees"
Date: 8 Oct 2011 10:30
Subject: Re: [HEADSUP]: ports feature freeze starts soon
To: "Thomas Mueller"
Cc: , "Erwin Lansing"
On 8 October 2011 10:22, Thomas M
On 8 October 2011 03:25, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 02:36:25PM -0400, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
>> Just a quick note the repo was synced about 15 mins before this
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Aryeh Friedman
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I have a local cvs repo and after checking sr
On 4 October 2011 19:36, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
>> What is your Wiki name?
>>
> "ArnaudLacombe"
>
> created this morning, with the same email address as the one I'm
> sending this email
On 4 October 2011 16:35, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 4 Oct 2011 16:26, "Arnaud Lacombe" wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The third BETA build of the 9.0
What is your Wiki name?
On 4 Oct 2011 16:26, "Arnaud Lacombe" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> The third BETA build of the 9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now
>>> available. Since this is t
On 25 August 2011 18:54, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 24 August 2011 16:14, wrote:
>>> When the specified or calculated rate exceeds 64KB/sec, the
>>> required sleep interval between 64KB chunks is less than one
>>> second. Since diskcheckd calculates the interval in w
mment and manpage improvememts.
>
Hi Perry,
The changes look good, so if there's no response for a few days I'll
commit the changes.
Thanks for rescuing the port :)
Chris
--
Chris Rees | FreeBSD Developer
cr...@freebsd.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~crees
___
On 19 December 2010 19:55, Torfinn Ingolfsen
wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to install FreeBSD 7.4-BETA1 / amd64 on this[1] machine.
> The machine doesn't have a CD drive built-in, so I am using a Plextor
> PX-608CU external DVD writer which connects via usb as the CD drive to
> install from. I use th
On 10 February 2010 07:10, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Rohit Grover wrote:
> Initially start FreeBSD and dump all of the related circuit register values
> . This may require a key board . Problem is to override this requirement .
> If in the system there is
On 8 February 2010 11:47, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 02:19:06PM +0530, Rohit Grover wrote:
>> I am using a very recent Freebsd 8.0 STABLE on a Macbook. I updated my
>> sources and rebuilt a kernel about 3 days ago. I was able to use the
>> machine fine once or twice after tha
2009/10/17 Clifford, Ken :
> Take me off this fucking list!@
>From the bottom of the email you just sent:
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
You're welcome.
C
2009/6/22 Eric Furman :
> BWAAAHAHAHAHAH, what a bunch of retards
> Please stop sending this crap to OBSD lists.
>
Oh yeah, OpenBSD people also tend to be *very* direct with
conversations, demonstrated by Eric here.
Not entirely a criticism, it's just that you can expect the climate in
mailing l
2009/6/7 Clifton Royston :
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 04:12:41PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
>> > 2009/6/7 Clifton Royston :
>> >
>> >> If you feel you just *can't* do it via a script in
>> >
2009/6/7 Clifton Royston :
> If you feel you just *can't* do it via a script in
> /usr/local/etc/rc.d, which is the better way, add a script called
> /etc/rc.local and that will be run after all the other start-up steps.
What's wrong with rc.local?
Chris
--
A: Because it messes up the order i
2009/2/25 Christian Walther :
> 2009/2/24 SDH Support :
>>
>>> I tried using my ath based D-Link DWL G650, which still seems to have
>>> some issues in regard to interrupt handling:
>>
>>
>> I've been able to get /most/ wireless cards working with ndiswrapper.
>>
> This is just my personal opinion,
2009/2/25 Paul B. Mahol :
> On 2/24/09, SDH Support wrote:
>>
>>> I tried using my ath based D-Link DWL G650, which still seems to have
>>> some issues in regard to interrupt handling:
>>
>>
>> I've been able to get /most/ wireless cards working with ndiswrapper.
>
> *BSD doesnt have ndiswrapper.
2008/12/17 :
> This is a test message from Cogeco Cable. No reply is necessary.
What's wrong with http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-test ?
--
R< $&h ! > $- ! $+ $@ $2 < @ $1 .UUCP. > (sendmail.cf)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org ma
> Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 21:00:48 +0200
> From: Eirik Wix?e Svela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Is FreeBSD a suitable choice for a MacBook?
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> I have an Apple MacBook with an Intel Co
2008/8/11 Warren Liddell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Which Belkin wireless card do you have? Which arch are you running
>> (i386/amd64)?
>>
>> I had horrific trouble with a Belkin on the Realtek chipset, played up
>> with Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Fedora, even Windows!
>>
>> Trouble with Belkin is, you never kn
> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:33:54 +1000
> From: Warren Liddell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I downloaded the drivers for the chipset my belkin wireless card has, used
> ndisgen to create the kernel module, which all went aok .. however when
> trying to load the module it hard hangs the machine to the poi
2008/8/4 Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:00:16AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
>> Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:55:53 +0200
>> > Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>&g
Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:55:53 +0200
> Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Just to be sure: also if the first command you try on the interface is
>> 'ifconfig up'?
>
> Hello Torfinn,
>
> good point, no. The problem appears when the first thing called
2008/7/14 Sorin Pânca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm sorry for my late response, I was on vacation.
> I think this was the case (although I thought we have only amd64 machines).
> Is there a way to recover from this situation by ssh access only?
>
> Thank you!
>
On 02/07/2008, Chris Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 10:55:07 +0200
> > "Daniel Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >
> >> Can the OP get some non-Samsung disks for testing?
>
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
