On 19 Feb 2013 14:23, "Mikhail T." <mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com> wrote: > > 18.02.2013 15:26, Chris Rees написав(ла): >> >> I'm sure you understand that our compiler in base is rather elderly, >> and that a project as insanely huge as Libreoffice is going to be >> highly sensitive to minute changes. > > No, Chris... I do not understand this wonderfully PR-esque response. See, my understanding always was, the only possible reasons for a compiler to produce a non-starting executable are: > The code is buggy. > The compiler is buggy. > Both of the above. > My question was, which is it?
My answer is that it is almost certainly (b). You are welcome to ask upstream about it, but I doubt they would show much interest in such an old compiler. I think it's insanity that we still use this version for ports by default, but never mind. Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
