On 24 February 2012 01:35, Erich Dollansky <erichfreebsdl...@ovitrap.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday 24 February 2012 01:25:01 Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> >> This is NOT a troll. >> This is NOT a flame. >> Do NOT hijack this thread to troll/flame. >> > allow them some fun too. >> >> >> Now, I find the number of problem reports regarding 9.0-RELEASE alarming >> and I'm growing more and more fearful towards it. >> >> In the current state of things, I have *absolutely* no wish to run it in >> production :( >> > Did you read deeply into the strategy behind the releases? If I remember > right, the odd numbers are a little bit more experimental compared to the > even numbers. For myself, I try to stick with even numbers whenever possible. > If I install FreeBSD on a serious machine, I never use x.0. It must be at > least x.1.
There's no such odd/even number policy with FreeBSD-- I think you're thinking of another OS ;) You're right that x.0 is slightly more experimental in general though (by its nature, it must be). Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
