On 4 Jan 2013 09:25, "Erich Dollansky" <erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 09:38:05 +0100 > "Patrick M. Hausen" <hau...@punkt.de> wrote: > > > Am 03.01.2013 um 19:21 schrieb Matthew Seaman > > <m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk>: > > > On 03/01/2013 17:48, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > >> I'm a bit reluctant to installing svn on every system that needs > > >> source updates. Are there more lightweight ways? > > > > > > freebsd-update(8) > > > > > > which is what 'make update' will run by default and in the absence > > > of any configuration to use other mechanisms. > > > > > > Sorry for being too terse in my first post. Seems like I should have > > a closer look at freebsd-update. "Of course" I have lines like this > > in my /etc/make.conf on each machine that I update from sources: > > no matter, you showed how deeply this integration was up to the point > that you did not notice it anymore. > > You also showed that there was a reliable infrastructure available > which served you for years without any problems. > > What will happen after the jump into the cold water?
Is there a problem with using freebsd-update for your sources too? Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
