ck 'em both in there) --
and if so then perhaps default behavior should be changed.
--
Karl Denninger
k...@denninger.net
/The Market Ticker/
/[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
.
If THAT is what's making it mad (its seeing reserved address packets
that are never routable coming from me) then my turning it off may fix
it, but I don't know.
--
Karl Denninger
k...@denninger.net
/The Market Ticker/
/[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On 6/18/2025 21:29, Zhenlei Huang wrote:
On Jun 19, 2025, at 6:00 AM, Karl Denninger wrote:
Resurrecting an older thread
Can you please point me to the thread ? I'd like to gather more
context from that.
It was under this title; should be in the archives from June of last year
00 Ed Maste wrote ---
> On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 at 01:32, Ben woodswoods...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> In the previous threads some objections were raised about dhcpcd's
> lack of sandboxing (Capsicum / privilege separation), which has since
> been addressed.
>
> I w
call which can be used to push
changes to a DDNS server and since its "one thing instead of two" if
you're on dynamic addresses and using DDNS its more-convenient than
dealing with it in both the "factory" DHCP software for IPv4 and in
dhcp6c for the "6" side.
--
Karl Denninger
k...@denninger.net
/The Market Ticker/
/[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
expected on an immediate
basis but the box did come up, did get a delegation and my clients got
SLACC addresses as expected so "first blush" it looks good.
--
Karl Denninger
k...@denninger.net
/The Market Ticker/
/[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On 2/21/2025 14:18, Roy Marples wrote:
Aha!
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:34:25 + Roy Marples wrote
---
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 17:49:28 +0000 Karl
Denninger wrote ---
> > The issue that I had with it not configuring properly on a
cold boot, as far as I
tps://reviews.freebsd.org/D22012
Maybe some FreeBSD comitter could pickup the torch and move things forward?
Roy
The issue that I had with it not configuring properly on a cold boot, as
far as I know, has not been addressed -- unless there are updates since
you and I conversed on that point.
--
K
v6ra_autoconf
ia_pd 0/::/56 intnet1/42 intnet2/56
Thanks.
- Chris
--
Karl Denninger
k...@denninger.net
/The Market Ticker/
/[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 7/31/2024 08:00, Karl Denninger wrote:
On 7/31/2024 07:10, Roy Marples wrote:
Roy Marples
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 03:38:46 +0100 Karl Denninger wrote ---
> Starting dhcpcd.
> dhcpcd-10.0.8 starting
> igb0: link state changed to UP
> igb1
On 7/31/2024 07:10, Roy Marples wrote:
Roy Marples
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 03:38:46 +0100 Karl Denninger wrote ---
> Starting dhcpcd.
> dhcpcd-10.0.8 starting
> igb0: link state changed to UP
> igb1: link state changed to UP
> no in
On 7/30/2024 16:54, Karl Denninger wrote:
On 7/30/2024 10:44, Roy Marples wrote:
Don't use -T in the real world. It will exit once one address family completes.
You probably want the --noconfigure option.
Roy
Ah, ok.
Well, next couple days I cannot screw with the network configur
one script" that
handles both -- right now, with two programs, I have to deal with both
separately as there are things on that box that do have to be
reconfigured or at least restarted on an IP address change.
--
Karl Denninger
k...@denninger.net
/The Market Ticker/
/[S/
now delayed auth had been obsoleted, thanks for letting
me to notice.
I'll try dhcpcd instead of dhcp6c.
Best Regards,
--
Karl Denninger
k...@denninger.net
/The Market Ticker/
/[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Nevermind -- I found an old Bugzila entry on this; the mlx4 driver does
not autoload the dependency (mlx4en) kernel module. With that loaded
manually it now appears to be working properly.
On 7/25/2024 12:45, Karl Denninger wrote:
Unable to determine PCI device chain minimum BW
--
Karl
solve and neither do the release note or user manual
links)
Thanks in advance!
--
Karl Denninger
k...@denninger.net
/The Market Ticker/
/[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 7/24/2024 04:10, Roy Marples wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 02:48:15 +0100 Karl Denninger wrote ---
> I'd like to replicate this that is currently being sent up via
dhcp6c, which is not quite-clear to me from the docs on how to do that..
> #
>
plicate that in the config file for
dhcpcd; I can figure out the script I'm sure, but the base config is not
clear to me.
--
Karl Denninger
k...@denninger.net
/The Market Ticker/
/[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
uot;
I also modify /etc/rtadvd.conf as the default for lifetime is wildly too
large and if you don't change it and then the gateway reboots you can be
waiting a LONG time before a client behind the gateway will re-validate
its IPv6 address and routing information.
root@IpGw:/data/karl # mor
his; snippet from
/etc/rc.conf:
#
# IPv6 on internal interface, autoconfigure
#
ifconfig_igb0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv"
rtsold_enable="YES"
And it does.
.
(addresses and options)
status: active
nd6 options=23
--
Karl Denninger
k...@denninger.n
On 1/13/2020 10:26, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Karl Denninger wrote:
>
> [dd]
>
>> Strongswan works fine with Win10 HOWEVER note that Windows 10 until
>> somewhat recently (last summer, I believe) and ALL PREVIOUS VERSIONS
>> (e.g. Win7, 8, etc.) had a SEVERE problem
see what I mean) and StrongSwan will happily allow that. If you set
something even better (e.g. modp2048) and haven't made the registry
changes on the client side then a client that hasn't done it with
registry changes (whether by Powershell or direct edit) will not be able
to connec
--On 04 July 2019 10:59 +0200 Christian M
wrote:
From my tests I found that 10.4-RELEASE was as fast as you could expect
(>10Gbit/s), then something changed in 11.0-RELEASE and carried on and got
even worse in 12.0-RELEASE. Would it not be a good idea to begin there
(10.4 -> 11.0), and try
nderstand) - it leaves FreeBSD pretty much
stuck, at least for some usage cases.
Regards,
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
quite-severe incident
because it left the external connection completely invisible -- if there
had been nobody available on the "inside" to do that manually.....
I'm on 12-STABLE r343809 on the specific box in question.
--
Karl Denninger
k...@denninger.net <mailto:k...@denn
I'm connecting to:
[karl@NewFS ~]$ ping6 svn.freebsd.org
PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) 2600:8807:8600:7941:230:48ff:fe9f:1d6 -->
2610:1c1:1:606c::e6a:0
16 bytes from 2610:1c1:1:606c::e6a:0, icmp_seq=0 hlim=54 time=58.461 ms
16 bytes from 2610:1c1:1:606c::e6a:0, icmp_seq=1 hlim=54 time=58.114 m
?" sort of request; what I find
especially interesting, however, is that it /always /happens when
talking to Project machines for updates whether for packages or SVN,
which is why I'm bringing it here.
--
Karl Denninger
k...@denninger.net <mailto:k...@denninger.net>
/The Market Ticker/
/[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Ipfw's internal nat will do this out of the box.
-- Karl
Original Message
From: m...@netfence.it
Sent: May 18, 2018 16:29
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Proxy a TCP connection
Hello.
Let's say I have a router connected to the Internet on one side and to a
LAN with priv
On 1/4/2018 10:32, Lewis Donzis wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2018, at 10:17 AM, Karl Denninger wrote:
>> I've written a fair bit of code that binds to both Ipv4 and v6 for
>> incoming connections, using two sockets (one for each.)
>>
>> Perusing around the 'net I see
.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/ssw_i5_54/rzab6/xacceptboth.htm
--
Karl Denninger
k...@denninger.net <mailto:k...@denninger.net>
/The Market Ticker/
/[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
n purpose.
I'd like to ram that up someone's chute out at Microslug, never mind
that their default proposals are intentionally insecure (gee, I wonder
if someone in the government "asked nicely" for that?) That's fixable
with a bit of registry editing, but the lack of IKEv2 frag support is a
killer and has basically forced me to support OpenVPN when there are
windows clients around and you have no control (at all) over the
networks in the middle between the client and server.
--
Karl Denninger
k...@denninger.net <mailto:k...@denninger.net>
/The Market Ticker/
/[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
tore the skews, push them to a very
high value, mark as 'BACKUP' all the VHID's - and something to undo it all
again - though actually just removing it might be easier (providing adding
it doesn't cause a moment of "I'm MASTER, uh, no, I'm BACKUP").
-K
;re taking services down, and
don't want the host to 'accidentally' pickup stray CARP vhid's from other
boxes (because there's no service running).
Thanks,
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
e the
> network starts? Of is there a better way?
>
> Thanks!
I am seeing the same behavior with an X220 Thinkpad with (what I believe
is) the same Centrino (a/b/g capable) WiFi card. It works /most of the
time /eventually, but often will cycle two or three times before it
finally
implify the IPv4 gameplaying that's
necessary to have something behind a gateway router while on a "globally
visible", but possibly changing "at whim", IpV6 address.
I assume someone has gone after this issue by now so if there's "prior
art" a pointer would
omeone can confirm it's working
properly on other architectures but not on ARM.)
On 5/12/2017 12:45, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Under fairly heavy stress (~50% of the 100Mbps possible FDX performance)
> I've now run into a problem that is turning into something I can repeat
>
ot; outcome for that involuntary
situation. But in the event that a local process *would* cause a buffer
overrun the kernel will instead return an error to the calling process
and *not* toss the data on the floor.
--
Karl Denninger
k...@denninger.net <mailto:k...@denninger.net>
/The Market Ticker/
/[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
get a chance I'll
see if I can run it up one of the affected boxes, if I can find one I can
mess around with.
Good to know it wasn't just "me" :)
Cheers,
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mai
--On 06 September 2016 09:13 +0100 Karl Pielorz
wrote:
We've just changed the network config on a box - going from a single
'em1' adapter to a lagg failover of em0, em1.
Sorry - not enough coffee yet, I should have said this is on FreeBSD
10.3-RELEASE-p7 a
it was we had to log into a number of key boxes and 'arp -d' the IP's -
and take a ~800 second 'hit' on other boxes timing out the old MAC.
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
that should be documented.
>
>
This is kinda serious in that the above manifestation in svn effectively
disables it for those of us that are on IPv4 connections and have no
provider capability for IPv6 at the present time. When I was running
10.2 this was not a problem but as soon as
ise...
Regards,
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
we originally set this up way-back-when we had a lot of fun with the
various ways & syntax of getting it setup, just settling for the way we do
'because it works' - not ideal I guess, so I'd be interested to see if
there's another way of spec'ing the config i
--On 23 June 2016 14:30 +0200 Michael Gmelin wrote:
I don't think having an IP address on an interface that also has vlan
interfaces is a good idea. What kind of traffic are you expecting on
lagg1?
Hi,
This has worked for 'quite a while' (i.e. >year). lagg1 is connected to an
HP switch th
--On 23 June 2016 11:53 +0100 Karl Pielorz wrote:
This gets increasingly weird if I run tcpdump on the 10.3 box. The act of
running 'tcpdump -i lagg1.30 -n' actually fixes the problem:
As a follow up - running 'ifconfig lagg1 promisc' fixes the issue as well
(as you
ttl=64 time=0.320 ms
If I ctrl-c the tcpdump on the 10.3 box at this point - pings stop dead.
Restart the tcpdump - pings resume.
Restoring 10.1 on the box fixes this - but I'd obviously rather be using
10.3 now.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
-Karl
___
(i.e. from the man page).
Hope this helps...
Certainly appears to have, thanks!
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
parent (i.e. em0/em1)? - It would seem to in at least some cases (i.e. the
other people who seem to have this working).
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
eople running the same ifconfig
(admittedly on different FreeBSD versions / cards) and getting what I'd
expect [a working system], but I don't?
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
So sadly, I'm still stuck :(
Something is lopping 4 bytes off the MTU when it shouldn't need to. None of
the example configs I could find were from 10.1-R (or with exactly the same
cards) - but obviously this is just bread & butter lagg/VLAN stuff, so it
should work?
-
agg0.10 has shrunk by 4 (size of VLAN tag). Is there a way of
avoiding that?
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--On 14 June 2015 15:15 +0100 Karl Pielorz wrote:
I've disconnected 're1' again (as before) to see if that stops it locking
up.
Ok, don't use re1 for anything - the box is stable. Use re1 (even for
fairly low volumes of traffic) and the box locks up hard after a random
gged at all for the time it had
been up.
-Karl
--On 14 June 2015 12:28:16 +0100 Karl Pielorz
wrote:
--On 12 June 2015 08:53:03 -0700 Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
If this works for people then we should document this somewhere and
include the firmware/tool.
I upgraded the firmware (boa
nd so far, this does appear to have fixed
the problem.
The 'TinyCore Linux installer' PC Engines have on their site (as a windows
.exe that creates a bootable USB) comes with the latest 'beta' firmware
[which I installed].
I've let PC Engines know as well that
nfortunately we need all 3 interfaces working when these boxes are
deployed - so longer term, avoiding re1 isn't really an option :(
Since moving from re1 to re2 (and rebooting) - I've not seen any watchdog
timeout errors for any re interface.
-Karl
--On 10 June 2015 21:44:50 +
onally) is:
"
re1: watchdog timeout
re1: link state changed to DOWN
re1: link state changed to UP
re1: watchdog timeout
re1: link state changed to DOWN
re1: link state changed to UP
re1: watchdog timeout
re1: link state changed to DOWN
re1: link state changed to UP
"
Any suggestions?
Ch
connection via select() (allowing
detection of exceptions as well) and then calls accept() and, now having a
connected file handle, fork()s and executes whatever is to handle the
connection with the parent closing the handle so as to not orphan the handle
when the child exits.
-- Karl
(On Passport PDA
--On 30 July 2014 13:26 +0400 Hrant Dadivanyan wrote:
Hi Karl,
I'm not sure whether it's on by default, but many Cisco switches
(including all in 3750 family) can tag native vlan, so no a packet will
leave ports untagged.
no vlan dot1q tag native
in configuration mode will s
'll do some
more digging around comparing that, to the remote kit / setup.
I was just ruling out any known issues doing this kind of thing (which
there doesn't appear to be).
Regards,
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
.
I would say we'd try it with a different O/S but at the moment, all the kit
on 'our' side is FreeBSD based...
Cheers,
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
it's
checksum related - which '-txcsum' seems to address for clients, but not
the router).
If some kind soul can have a look at this - and suggest anything?
Cheers,
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
heavily queuing
outgoing packets - or binning them off?
Thanks,
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 3/23/2014 10:57 AM, Karl Denninger wrote:
On 3/23/2014 12:01 AM, Karl Denninger wrote:
On 3/22/2014 5:44 PM, Karl Denninger wrote:
FreeBSD-STABLE 10 r263037M
It *looks* like anything coming in through IPSEC and being decoded
in there never goes through the ipfw chain at all
On 3/23/2014 12:01 AM, Karl Denninger wrote:
On 3/22/2014 5:44 PM, Karl Denninger wrote:
FreeBSD-STABLE 10 r263037M
It *looks* like anything coming in through IPSEC and being decoded in
there never goes through the ipfw chain at all.
This may be addressed by PR185876 checking
On 3/22/2014 5:44 PM, Karl Denninger wrote:
FreeBSD-STABLE 10 r263037M
Configuration has outside IPSEC connections coming in to Strongswan
which should then be able to NAT back out to the Internet. The
premise here is that "roaming" people may connect to this box and
obtain both
side Internet access, since the
client points default at the IPSEC'd connection.
This used to work on 9.1, but am uncertain whether it has since.
It does NOT under 10.0.
[root@Gateway /disk/karl]# ipsec status
Security Associations (1 up, 0 connecting):
XX[3]: ESTABLISHED 5 minutes
up) - to avoid any possibility of the box coming up,
and 'stealing' MASTER even if the other machine is down... (something which
you apparently can't achieve with rc.conf).
What version of the OS are you using ?
9.2-RC2 on amd64.
-Karl
___
quently doing a 'ifconfig carp0' doesn't bring it up either :(
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 4/20/2013 11:01 PM, Karl Denninger wrote:
> On 4/20/2013 9:36 PM, Karl Denninger wrote:
>> I don't think so -- gre is not involved in the config.
>>
>> On 4/20/2013 7:59 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
>>> - Original Message - From: "Karl Denninger&q
On 4/20/2013 9:36 PM, Karl Denninger wrote:
> I don't think so -- gre is not involved in the config.
>
> On 4/20/2013 7:59 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
>> - Original Message - From: "Karl Denninger"
>> ...
>>> My "ordinary" NAT entry
I don't think so -- gre is not involved in the config.
On 4/20/2013 7:59 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Karl Denninger"
> ...
>> My "ordinary" NAT entry is simply "nat 1 ip from any to any via em1",
>> whic
t translate those packets then I can use the VPN to get INTO
the network but I CANNOT use it to make the remote machine appears to be
PART OF the network, and that sucks.
Any ideas?
--
-- Karl Denninger
/The Market Ticker ®/ <http://market-ticker.org>
Cuda Systems LLC
hash?) or even 4k to
cover expansion.
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Is there anything I need to tune for this kind of quantity (or
more), or is it all 'auto-adjusting' on 9.0-S onwards?
Thanks,
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubsc
e
wise.
In all the years I've been doing this - that'll be the first NIC that's
ever failed "after" installation...
Regards,
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ve got a problem :( - But probably not the same problem that I
have on this SuperMicro machine :-(
-Karl
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ow if that's "bad").
The HP switch it's connected to doesn't seem to log any errors for the port.
Any suggestions on how I can debug this further, or any ideas to try and
fix it?
You can find the dmesg output here:
<http://www.tdx.com/dmesg.txt>
(ifcon
I installed freebsd 9.0_amd64 and it can't find my network. i tried to add
"if_re_load="YES"" But it didn't help.
Is the Realtek 8111F not suported by freebsd yet?
Motherboard: ASUS P8H77-I
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
extauth-script /usr/local/etc/mpd5/mpd_auth.sh
set auth enable ext-auth
set auth disable internal
Karl Dunn
kd...@acm.org
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
Jack,
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You know I generally try to maintain courtesy and civility in my
> dealings with the community but this really ticks me off.
>
> I have stayed out of this thread because I figured it was only
> fair that those with obvi
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a point of reference for fellow readers:
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=brian.mcginty+freebsd&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=
And your point is?
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org ma
Haiku Bounties: www.haikubounties.org
Is looking for developers to take up their code bounties for a usb stack.
Please drop by the site and apply if interested!
_
Take charge with a pop-up guard built on patented Microsoft® SmartSc
power supply becomes a $200 one once the
warranty ends - good for them, not good for you.
Other than that, I've been pretty happy with their stuff. Sure beats a lot
of other "PC" vendors out there in terms of reliability, heat management,
BIOS updates, etc.
--
--
Karl Denning
Hi,
I tried that, but I'm just a dumb high school kid who even after
reading it, didn't understand the syntax, nor how to make it work.
Sorry
Karl
On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 04:58 PM, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
Karl,
try
man arp
man route
on your FreeBSD system.
Ma
Sorry, I should have tried this out before sending the other email.
Your new route comand works, but the arp command says:
set: can only proxy for 10.10.10.0
Any ideas?
Thanks again,
Karl
set: can only proxy for 10.10.10.0
On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 04:59 PM, Martin J. Muench wrote
e add -net 10.10.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth1
route add default gw 10.10.10.0 dev eth1
anyone know how i would change these commands to work with the FreeBSD
versions of arp and route?
Thanks!
Karl
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in
Recieved and Confirmed..
Thanks,
Karl Clapp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
Great Works Internet
Technical Support Department
Online Help http://support.gwi.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.800.229.2096
**
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Thierry Herbelot
87 matches
Mail list logo
