--On 29 July 2014 09:24 -0400 Mike Tancsa <m...@sentex.net> wrote:
Would it not be better to have switchport trunk allowed vlan 2200-2300 otherwise its not clear to me what would be tagged and what would not be tagged as vlan 2000, no ?
I don't think that's the issue - I've had a couple of emails from other people who have this setup working, so I'd guess that's just a syntactical 'whats better / worse' kind of thing...
Do you really need to send a mix of tagged and untagged frames on the port ?
Yes, the project involves an element of migration - existing hosts being brought over will not have VLAN support, and a requirement is for them to just 'drop in' to the network, and still work.
Thanks to those who replied (on and off list) - I've been able to create a test setup in house, which doesn't seem to have the issue - so I'll do some more digging around comparing that, to the remote kit / setup.
I was just ruling out any known issues doing this kind of thing (which there doesn't appear to be).
Regards, -Karl _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
