Cool!
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: 16 August 2012 23:47
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: piter...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Adobe Donation Update
OK, TLF has been checked in. The donation was prepared by the former TLF
team. I have no idea if the
Nice!
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: 09 August 2012 08:05
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Flex trademark assigned to Apache Software Foundation
The Apache Flex PPMC would like to inform our community that Adobe Systems
Inc. has assigned th
Hi,
Original Message
> From: "Alex Harui"
> > but my question is this: If I am using Flash Builder 4.6, what will i
need to
> > do to compile the sdk for use in testing?
> For testing changes to the compiler or the SDK or your apps? The
compiler
> code is in Java and has Ecl
WOW! I want one of each!
Original Message
> From: "Tomasz Maciag | Fuse Collective"
> Sent: sexta-feira, 16 de Março de 2012 13:11
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [OT] 360 Flex Denver 2012 - Apache Flex Discovery Room
>
> You can see our initial designs at [1]
> From: "Bertrand Delacretaz"
>
> If you want those namespace URLs to eventually point to documents they
> should be under http://flex.apache.org which will belong to this
> project once graduated.
>
> I'd suggest http://flex.apache.org/ns (meaning "namespaces") as a
> prefix for namespace URLs -
Hi Justin,
I made a couple of changes to your PostCodeValidator class in order for it
to "understand" Portuguese postcodes. I've also updated the unit tests to
include Portuguese postcode.
Do you want me to send in a patch or is it OK if I just commit the code to
your whiteboard?
I also wante
Original Message
> From: "Bertrand Delacretaz"
>
> I agree that these delays are not good, but I don't think we can do
> much about them. Either wait, or rewrite the missing parts.
>
As do I, but if you look around at other Apache project that were donated
in a mature state
Original Message
> From: "Bertrand Delacretaz"
>
> I don't think this has been mentioned on this list yet:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/learn/rules-for-revolutionaries.html
>
> "Any committer has the right to go start a revolution" - and if you're
> not a committer yet, s
Original Message
> From: "Arnoud Bos"
>
> Hi Tink,
>
> Your layouts / navigators are of great value! So consider this as interest :-)
> Maybe because they just work and people can grab them from the whiteboard
> there is not much feedback.
Interesting you mention this as I've ju
Original Message
> From: "James Cowan"
> This has probably been discussed before but I was wondering what the
> conclusion/response
> to the suggestion of linking Haxe with Flex was:
> http://ncannasse.fr/blog/open_letter_to_flex_community
>
This has indeed been discussed,
Igor, what you really mean is wrap or wrapper, isn't it?
Evolving the HTML template is a good idea, I think and keeping it in sync with
current trends does show how much we respect the web standards. However, I'm
not sure about the rest of the group, but I've never used the generated HTML in
fi
I agree with Carol. No bug numbers in code except where the solution is so
complex or so awkward that it requires some background (possibly
attachments and discussion thread from the JIRA issue.
Rui
Original Message
> From: "Carol Frampton"
> Sent: segunda-feira, 27 de Fevere
Original Message
> From: "David Arno"
>
> I suspect that asking him to leave is as unhelpful to the group as the
> original rudeness. The gentle way I was asked to tone down my language
> without any accompanying threats is probably the best way to keep us
more
> "colourful" fo
Original Message
> From: "Omar Gonzalez"
> Sent: sexta-feira, 24 de Fevereiro de 2012 8:06
>
> I don't think you can rename a branch, but maybe that's a good idea.
Name
> it patchStaging?
You can change Subversion branches. They're just basically folders, so
renaming them is
Original Message
> From: "Left Right"
> Sent: sexta-feira, 24 de Fevereiro de 2012 11:10
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [CODE] Short cleanup
>
> OMG!!! Seriously, you are writing SDK code and you don't know what's the
> difference between using `in' operato
Original Message
> From: "Justin Mclean"
> Sent: sexta-feira, 24 de Fevereiro de 2012 1:25
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [LAZY] Commit en_AU and en_GB locales to SVN
>
> Hi,
>
> I've created a new branch of the framework directory called
"localechanges".
Hi,
I hope I'm not stepping on anyone's toes here, but I went to the Incubator
monthly report wiki and started Flex's March report. I basically copied
what was on the February report and added the stuff I thought was
significant.
Please revise and correct if there is something wrong or missing
> From: "Nicolas Cannasse"
> I can't decide for you, but I can at least answer the questions you
> might have.
>
> Best,
> Nicolas
Thanks for the clarification Nicolas. I've been wanting to try out HaXe for
a long time. Maybe now is the moment to do it. I'd sure want to contribute
to this te
> From: "Dimitri k."
> Subject: Adobe might think of open-sourcing the Design View if there is
sufficient interest
>
> She concluded that the best thing to make it happen would be to show
> interrest for the open-sourcing of DV on this list.
>
That would definitely be very interesting. Will a
Computers as Theatre it is, Alex.
I'm liking a lot what I read and start to understand what you've been
hinting at in other posts. Looking forward to look into your code and
understand your ideas in more detail.
Rui
rdon. I appreciate the efforts you and your
team have been putting into improving the Flex compiler and I too would like
to see it being donated as soon as possible.
[Rui Silva]
Hi,
Just changed the getting started wiki page in order to reflect the fact that
the source code has already been imported to trunk. Also removed the
reference to the framework in the whiteboard area. Actually, now that we
have the source code in the trunk does it still make sense to keep the o
Hi,
I reached my contacts at Adobe regarding the possibility to use some of the
structure that has been implemented by Adobe for community translation. They
are considering the possibility to deploy those tools in a more open manner,
probably as a hosted service, as currently they are used sole
Hi,
> From: "Dave Fisher"
> I was looking to say similar. Here is a useful link.
http://producingoss.com/en/setting-tone.html#prevent-rudeness
>
> Regards,
> Dave
I was actually going to respond to David on the weekend with about the same
concerns especially in consideration for all the peop
> From: "Carol Frampton"
> The compiler team had absolutely no cuts last November. It was a
separate
> team from the Flex frameworks team.
>
> Carol
>
I stand corrected. Thanks for clarifying Carol.
Rui
> From: "David Arno"
>
> This is not a viable timescale for Apache Flex in my opinion. Therefore
> I feel we have no choice but to ignore Falcon and to start developing
> our own compiler with immediate effect. I therefore want to get an idea
> as to who, if anyone, here is interested in getting
Original Message
> From: "Doug Arthur"
>
> Ahh, I didn't consider that. I thought he was already on the commiters
> list, I should have looked. Anyway - Mike, I have assigned the ticket
> to you.
>
> - Doug
Now that you mention it, I believe I'm listed as a committer either
a tool that would greatly improve the way the community at
large could contribute with translations for the SDK.
I guess I can contact the people at Adobe I have been working with and see
if this is possible.
Cheers,
Rui Silva
Original Message
> From: "Michael A. Labriola"
>
> Not sure how the logistics of this would work, however, if we wanted to
bring FlexUnit into the fold, I would be willing to donate all of the code
to Apache directly. Right now it is MIT license.
>
That sounds great Mike.
Nice work! The new logo has a modern shiny plastic/rubbery feel to it. I love
it! It increases the depth of field perception on the whole composition giving
it more strength and presence. The two color/gray-scale version looks
particularly impressive with this solution.
I don't know about the r
Thanks Martin. There's one thing I'd change, thought and that's the
reference to [Binding] within the other thread markers. [Binding] is used
solely within a [Vote] to signal PPMC votes. I'll go ahead and take that
out. I'll also change thread markers to All Caps as that seems to be the
usual s
> I absolutely agree that it's good to keep such things around.
>
> -Bertrand
>
> [1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Compile-time-data+injection
Makes sense to me too. The wiki page having a comments section can also be
used to hold some discussion around what is described
> From: "Bertrand Delacretaz"
> Working in small steps, with some discussion if needed followed by a
> minimal prototype that demonstrates the ideas, works best for me.
>
> -Bertrand
It also works for me, small steps being the operative idea.
Rui
> From: "Peter Elst"
>
> Once all the practical steps are over, I look forward to more
contributions
> and less discussion which - with all due respect - does more to divide
us
> into opposing camps than get excited about the potential of the
technology.
> There is no need to purely see things
> From: "filippo dipisa"
>
> 1)My problem is, if you have to start a greenfield project web based,
would
> you use Flex or go for another RIA solution like GWT that already
targets
> html5?
Flex
> 2)If you start a client(desktop)/server project should you use Scala and
> JavaFx( that now you
Agreed. I wonder if we'll have this depth of discussion when we get to the
interesting bits about code and framework?
Original Message
> From: "João Saleiro"
> Sent: sexta-feira, 3 de Fevereiro de 2012 15:55
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] Logo Cho
Hi Filippo,
Original Message
> From: "filippo dipisa"
>
> Many thanks.
> Do you know if anyone started to think about a new runtime for
actionscript
> or flex not dependant to Adobe or FP and opensource?
I don't think that we should go down the route of creating another VM ju
I have to agree with Bertrand (though I don't know what bikeshedding
means... :) ). I sense that the discussion around the logo is getting far
too serious for my taste. The logo is important, but not THAT much that it
validates such nit picking.
Original Message
> From: "Bertr
Original Message
> From: "Bertrand Delacretaz"
> a) leftmost 4-colored logo
>
+1 (Binding)
I'd put them all on vote and a simple +1 would do just fine, IMHO.
Original Message
> From: "Tomasz Maciag | Fuse Collective"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 2 de Fevereiro de 2012 16:27
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Flex logo colors
>
> W dniu 2012-02-02 17:19
Also agree in both counts.
Original Message
> From: "Greg Reddin"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 2 de Fevereiro de 2012 14:50
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Flex logo colors
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Carol Frampton
wrote:
> > That said, I really li
Seems perfect to me.
Original Message
> From: "Alex Harui"
> Sent: terça-feira, 31 de Janeiro de 2012 20:40
> To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org"
> Subject: [DRAFT] Apache Flex Podling Incubator Status Report (February 2012)
>
> Below is my proposal for the status report for re
Hi James,
> From: "James Roland Cabresos"
> Jangaroo anyone? It supports AS3 and has it's own compiler that converts
> AS3 code to JS
>
> http://www.jangaroo.net/home/
>
>
Jangaroo still only supports a subset of AS3 and some of the things that
are not supported are extensively used in Fle
I'd rather not have any mention to reasoning why any of the submissions
have not been chosen. Let's focus on the one we considered to be the best
representation of Apache Flex.
Rui
Original Message
> From: "Greg Reddin"
> Sent: sexta-feira, 27 de Janeiro de 2012 17:17
> To: f
> From: "Doug McCune"
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [Binding] Logo - final tweaks
>
> >
> > C.7 I'd add some stationary elements that we could use in printable
> > documents used with more traditional communication channels.
>
> C.8 I'd also like to see some studies around printed presentation and
>
Tomasz,
First let me congratulate you and your team (especially Adrian) for the very
excellent and professional work you have been doing with (both) your logo
submissions.
Now, for the tweaking:
A. I agree that Flex should be more important than Apache. It is the name of
the project and carri
> From: "Tim Bosschaerts"
> Sounds like a plan to me
>
> Tim Bosschaerts
A great plan, I might add.
> From: "Jonathan Campos"
> How about the designer, good enough to win our contest, determine how
they
> want to take feedback. No design by committee.
I agree, seems like a great way to move forward.
Rui
Hi Ted,
> My only ask is... Please stay laser focused on making Apache Flex kick
ass.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ted Patrick
> Developer Relations
> Sencha
Thank you for the message. It's important that the world starts to focus on
each technology's strong points instead of competitors weak points. Yo
Francis,
> From: "Frank Altomare"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 26 de Janeiro de 2012 14:08>
> >
> > I, on the other hand, would 100% disagree and say that mobile features
are
> > very important.
> >
> >
> +1,
> I would actually say a focus on Mobile performance will really help out
the
> project
> Fr
> From: "David Arno"
> Someone suggested calling the first Apache release "lifeboat." I like
that,
> so it's what I have started referring to it as (it avoids the whole
> discussion on version numbers.) I don't know if anyone else uses the
term
> though.
>
> David.
For me, and for the time-be
+1 #42
(binding)
> From: "Dave Fisher"
> Once you have done so let this thread know. I'll periodically add people
to the committers group.
>
> Those that want admin rights can be added to that group as well.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
I've create a CWiki account with username rduartes. If there is any help
needed
David,
> Sent: segunda-feira, 23 de Janeiro de 2012 16:54
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org, jef...@dot-com-it.com
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Logo contest
>
> I'm a bit puzzled as to why the Rui didn't just publish the results and
why the PPMC needs to conduct the review in secret.
>
> David.
I h
Hi,
I'm fine with whatever solution we come up for version numbering. The
communication around it is what really matters, so that we explain clearly
how version x from Apache relates to version y from Adobe. People will
adjust and we can always change it in the future if we're not happy with
t
Omar,
> From: "Omar Gonzalez"
> Sent: domingo, 22 de Janeiro de 2012 14:45
> To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org"
> Subject: [DISCUSS] ApacheFlex Versioning (was Re: A newbie's guide to
building the SDK (and a question))
>
> Thoughts? Do we need a vote for versioning scheme?
>
> -omar
Seems p
Hi,
Fresh updates:
= First Round =
Round started on: 18-01-2012 21:25:00 (GMT)
Votes for this round accepted until:21-01-2012 21:25:00 (GMT)
= General Stats =
125 members have voted, 20 of which are PPMC members (binding).
Above Avg
ID 29: 1
ID 42: 4
(binding)
Hi Bogdan,
As per the rules in http://markmail.org/message/zfr64u4guwvlumcc, please
distribute your points by, at least, 2 submissions.
Thanks,
Rui
Original Message
> From: "Bogdan DINU"
> Sent: sábado, 21 de Janeiro de 2012 9:46
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject:
Hi Jude,
As per the rules in http://markmail.org/message/zfr64u4guwvlumcc, please
distribute your points across at least 2 submissions.
Thanks,
Rui
Original Message
> From: "jude"
> Sent: sexta-feira, 20 de Janeiro de 2012 17:14
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject:
> From: "Doug Arthur"
>
> Just as a note, I'll also be tallying votes tomorrow night so we have
> a cross comparison to make sure nothing gets missed.
> - Doug
That'll be great Doug! Thanks!
Rui
> From: "Jeffry Houser"
> I know someone asked before; but I didn't see a response. What do
> those numbers mean in relation to voting?
>
> Jeffry Houser
Hi Jefrry,
You can see my response to Michael here
http://markmail.org/message/thpxbumi5i4m7yaz. In the last tally I just
added how many
Hi,
Fresh updates:
= First Round =
Round started on: 18-01-2012 21:25:00
Votes for this round accepted until:21-01-2012 21:25:00
= General Stats =
112 members have voted, 17 of which are PPMC members (binding).
Above Avg 13
A
Hi Alfonso,
As per the rules in http://markmail.org/message/zfr64u4guwvlumcc, please
distribute your points across at least 2 submissions.
Thanks,
Rui
Original Message
> From: "alfonso fonso"
> Sent: sexta-feira, 20 de Janeiro de 2012 10:12
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Samuel,
I don't see your name in the PPMC member list. I will tag your vote as
non-binding unless you (or someone) provides proof of membership.
Thanks,
Rui
Original Message
> From: "Samuel Janzen"
> Sent: sexta-feira, 20 de Janeiro de 2012 8:10
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apach
daniel,
As per the rules in http://markmail.org/message/zfr64u4guwvlumcc, please
distribute your vote by ate least two entries.
Thanks,
Rui
Original Message
> From: "Daniel Nelson"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2012 20:34
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject
Hi Julierme,
As per the rules in http://markmail.org/message/zfr64u4guwvlumcc, please
distribute your points by, at least, 2 submissions.
Thanks,
Rui
Original Message
> From: "Jullierme Barros"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2012 19:04
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.o
Hi Mike,
> From: "Michael Schmalle"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2012 18:41
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: re: [LOGO CONTEST] Tallying the votes
>
> Quoting Rui Silva :
>
> >> Above Avg 12
> >> Above Avg + 1StD
Forgot to specify the timezones on the start and end dates. I'll make that
clear in further updates. All dates are in GMT.
Original Message
> From: "Rui Silva"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2012 18:23
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Hi,
I don't know if I'll be able to keep the counting for the rest of today
(GMT), so here's another update:
= First Round =
Round started on: 18-01-2012 21:25:00
Votes for this round accepted until:21-01-2012 21:25:00
= General Stats =
80 membe
> From: "Martin Heidegger"
>
> Sorry for being a little uneducated but: What is monocle?
>
> Martin.
Monocle is an external profiling tool that has been demoed at MAX by Deepa
and that is able to introspect content running inside the Flash Player with
great detail.
Rui
Hi again,
Another quick update on the voting process (now with some more info):
79 members voted, 8 of which are binding.
Above Avg 12
Above Avg + 1StD5
Above Avg + 2StD3
> From: "Michael Schmalle"
>
> Is this something I screwed up on? I'm just coming into this thread.
>
No Mike. They are at different URLs. It was probably an unfortunate
oversight from Denis himself.
Hi,
Just a quick update on the voting process:
72 members have voted of which 6 are PPMC.
Thanks,
Rui
Andrei,
You voted 6 points. Only 5 are allowed. Please re-vote.
Rui
Original Message
> From: "andrei apostolache"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2012 14:58
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Logo contest
>
> id 42: 3pt
> id 35: 2pt
> id 49: 1pt
Original Message
> From: "Dave Fisher"
>
> Agreed. If someone submitted two proposals those are separate. If both
proposals make it to a second round. We could certainly give the submitter
the chance to withdraw one. I happen to like a few of these and that will
make my vote
> From: "Greg Reddin"
>
> Are not 8 and 29 the same? Should we combine the votes for those 2
> into one or ask the submitter to withdraw one of them?
>
> 08 - : http://s.apache.org/af-logo-08
> 29 - : http://s.apache.org/af-logo-29
>
> Greg
You have a point Greg. Denis' odds of winning are bein
I think you missed the point.
Please check out the voting instructions here:
http://markmail.org/message/zfr64u4guwvlumcc
Original Message
> From: "Garrafa Pet 2 Litros"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2012 12:29
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE]
Hi,
Just a quick update on the voting process:
54 members have voted, of which 2 are binding.
Thanks,
Rui
Marcus,
You have just used 4 points. Please re-vote using 5 points.
Original Message
> From: "Marcus Fritze"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2012 10:51
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org, "Marcus Fritze"
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Logo contest
>
> ID 04: 1 pt.
> ID 35: 2
> From: "Dany Dhondt"
>
> Do we vote on this list or do we use the link provided earlier:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dGRaaGZXZTk1Sk9Jb0w1eHl
OX1pBanc6MQ
>
> -Dany
On the list, please.
Thanks,
Rui
Hi Glenn,
Please split up the vote across at least 2 entries (in accordance to the
rules).
Cheers,
Rui
Original Message
> From: "Glenn Williams"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2012 9:55
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Logo contest
>
> ID:49-->5p
Fréderic,
You have to split up your vote to at least 2 entries.
Original Message
> From: "Fréderic Cox"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 2012 9:51
> To: "Apache Flex Mailing List"
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Logo contest
>
> ID 42 => 5pts
Hi all,
I'm keeping the tally on a spreadsheet that I'll publish as soon as the
first round finishes in order to help tallying the votes. We've had a
pretty good participation so far.
If there's a general consensus on publishing this document earlier (I'd
rather not, in order to not influence
> From: "Peter Elst"
>
> (...) an experimental branch of the Flex
> framework that we can get feedback on to see what works and what doesn't
> before it goes into the core code base.
>
> - Peter
I generally agree with this idea, as long as we are aware of the cost
required to maintain two main
> From: "Doug McCune"
>
> One of the reasons for people being optimistic about the move to Apache
is
> the opportunity for bugs that people couldn't get Adobe to fix to get
> fixed. To show progress and momentum I'd urge you all to try to fix some
> bugs and get releases out there that people can
> From: "Rick Winscot"
> Is anyone under the impression that they are going to be able to swap out
the Adobe Flex 4.6 SDK for Apache Flex 4.7 without issues??? I think we are
loosing track of the fact that what we are doing here in all likelihood is
_not_ going to be a drop-in replacement for
> From: "Alex Harui"
> The first release, even if it is
> just approximate parity with Adobe Flex 4.6 would be called "Apache Flex
> 2012". Any other release cut this year would be a point release
("Apache
> Flex 2012.1")
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs
> From: "João Saleiro"
>
> I suggest the following.
>
> 1- The voting is open to everyone, but PPMC votes are worth the double
> 2- A page is setup with all logos, with a # for each logo
> 3- A new unique thread is created for voting
> 4- Each person can distribute 5 points in the following way:
>
> From: "João Fernandes"
> I don't see the point of doing -1 on logos with that many entries.
>
> João Fernandes
I agree with João (that's why I proposed a 5 points systems :) ). I think there
are far too many entries and far too few PPMC members to have that sort of
vote. +1, 0, -1 works real
> From: "Jonathan Campos"
> Should people have to at least vote for 2 or 3 different logos. It may
be
> possible that everyone votes for a different logo and every logo gets 5
pts.
>
> --
> Jonathan Campos
I'd leave people free to vote in any way they want.
Rui
Hi people,
We should decide how the actual voting should occur within this list. I had
started a vote thread earlier which I'll repeat here to start up the
discussion:
1. Email on the mailing list with a list of URLs to the logos on contest;
2. Only PPMC member's votes are counted;
3. Each vo
rduartes
Same here. Just worked with my Apache account. I was thinking that you'd
only have to create a new JIRA account if you weren't an Apache member.
> From: "Peter Elst"
>
> I'm confused, I didn't create an account and my Apache login credentials
> just worked on JIRA.
>
> - Peter
>
> >
Rui
Jonathan,
Sounds like a great idea! Let me know if you want to offload some of that
work.
Rui
> From: "Martin Heidegger"
> (...) Also
> the if checks for the type cost performance.
>
> yours
> Martin.
>
I believe that the example stated there were no difference in the code that
sent any of the types. If that was not the case, I'd keep the descriptive
long method names.
Agree on the
> From: "David Arno"
> To quote Bertrand Meyer
> (http://drdobbs.com/184414874):
>
> "Overloading, the most masochistic device ever introduced, means that
you
> can give the same name to several methods as long as they differ by at
least
> one argument type. This is a rare example of a facility
João,
> This might be a stupid idea, but what if we had a Wiki with a couple of
> articles that we could use to write down important topics, being one of
> those articles something like "what is being worked on and who's behind
> it" with links to the SVN ? I think this would reinforce communicati
> From: "Carlos Rovira"
>
> I think Alex or Carol should give a clue if some work on this was
already
> started on the Adobe side to avoid duplicate efforts.
>
While that makes sense, Carlos, I wouldn't tell contributors to hold out
their contributions waiting for what already has been done b
> From: "Erik de Bruin"
> The other day I came across this article ([1]) on Slashdot about the
> effort to remove unused code from the LibreOffice project. Is that
> something that might be relevant to a framework like Flex (it's been
> around for a while, after all)?
>
> Sound like a great way
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
