> From: "Martin Heidegger" <m...@leichtgewicht.at>
> (...) Also 
> the if checks for the type cost performance.
> 
> yours
> Martin.
> 

I believe that the example stated there were no difference in the code that 
sent any of the types. If that was not the case, I'd keep the descriptive 
long method names.

Agree on the type safety when you use *, but I would only use that when any 
type is absolutely admissible, or I'd keep the descriptive long method 
names.

Rui

Reply via email to