> From: "Martin Heidegger" <m...@leichtgewicht.at> > (...) Also > the if checks for the type cost performance. > > yours > Martin. >
I believe that the example stated there were no difference in the code that sent any of the types. If that was not the case, I'd keep the descriptive long method names. Agree on the type safety when you use *, but I would only use that when any type is absolutely admissible, or I'd keep the descriptive long method names. Rui