I have to agree with Bertrand (though I don't know what bikeshedding means... :) ). I sense that the discussion around the logo is getting far too serious for my taste. The logo is important, but not THAT much that it validates such nit picking.
-------- Original Message -------- > From: "Bertrand Delacretaz" <bdelacre...@apache.org> > Sent: sexta-feira, 3 de Fevereiro de 2012 10:46 > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [WTF?] final vote for logo color(s) selection > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:27 AM, David Arno <da...@davidarno.org> wrote: > > Who's brilliant idea was it to divide the single colour vote across four > > viable candidates, thus ensuring the multi-coloured option easily won the > > vote? This vote couldn't have been more rigged (no doubt completely > > accidently in this case) if people had tried!... > > If there's any blame it's on me as I started the vote, but I don't see > the problem. > > http://www.fusecollective.com/apache-flex/apache_flex_colors.jpg > provides 5 options to choose from. > > My plan is that we select one, make that the Flex logo and move on > with other tasks more directly related to this project's goal. > > There's no way everybody will agree on a logo color - it's pure > bikeshedding at this point, so a vote between the 5 provided options > is a fair way to move on, IMO. > > -Bertrand