I have to agree with Bertrand (though I don't know what bikeshedding 
means... :) ). I sense that the discussion around the logo is getting far 
too serious for my taste. The logo is important, but not THAT much that it 
validates such nit picking.

-------- Original Message --------
> From: "Bertrand Delacretaz" <bdelacre...@apache.org>
> Sent: sexta-feira, 3 de Fevereiro de 2012 10:46
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [WTF?] final vote for logo color(s) selection
> 
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:27 AM, David Arno <da...@davidarno.org> wrote:
> > Who's brilliant idea was it to divide the single colour vote across 
four
> > viable candidates, thus ensuring the multi-coloured option easily won 
the
> > vote? This vote couldn't have been more rigged (no doubt completely
> > accidently in this case) if people had tried!...
> 
> If there's any blame it's on me as I started the vote, but I don't see
> the problem.
> 
> http://www.fusecollective.com/apache-flex/apache_flex_colors.jpg
> provides 5 options to choose from.
> 
> My plan is that we select one, make that the Flex logo and move on
> with other tasks more directly related to this project's goal.
> 
> There's no way everybody will agree on a logo color - it's pure
> bikeshedding at this point, so a vote between the 5 provided options
> is a fair way to move on, IMO.
> 
> -Bertrand 


Reply via email to