On Fri, 2022-10-28 at 11:05 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> IMO we should wait for the "official unofficial" new mailing list. If
> the time until the end of life of this list on gnome.org shouldn't be
> enough time, to get the new "official unofficial" mailing list, we
> probably s
On Wed, 2022-11-02 at 16:18 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I think that should be possible here as well, no?
>
> Not sure how that works. Was that email addressed directly to you, or
> was it a general post to the list?
I am also on the network-manager list.
What happened was that someone
On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 06:07 +, Mike wrote:
> I purged evolution from the PC, deleted the .config/evolution
> folders, deleted the trash, rebooted, reinstalled at 12:36 and ran it
> at 12:37. I did not import the backup file, so that isn't the
> problem.
>
> None of these errors are in the VM i
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 15:15 -0600, Tim McConnell wrote:
> Your problem with using the flathub version is because the Flatpack
> doesn't honor the dependencies of the distribution.
I'm not sure I understand this comment. The whole point of flatpak
(and snap) is that it's not _supposed_ to need to
On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 16:17 -0600, Tim McConnell via evolution-list
wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-11-07 at 16:34 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand this comment. The whole point of flatpak
> > (and snap) is that it's not _supposed_ to need to worry about th
On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 09:33 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> I know this is getting way of topic, but this is primarily why I shy
> away from Flatpak. You download a blob of "stuff" and you have no
> real idea what is in that - it could be some ancient bug-ridden
> library that the dev has decided to use
On Tue, 2022-11-08 at 17:07 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> the only tricky part is to run it in the flatpak sandbox. It's easy
> once you know how to do it:
>
> $ flatpak run --command=sh org.gnome.Evolution
Yes, I am familiar with this since I used it to help you debug the
issue
It's clear that no one has any actual pros/cons that they want to
discuss in a serious way. So, this is my last message on this topic.
I simply urge people to not take these "it's horrible" statements,
without any reference to actual problems that anyone has ever had in
real life and very little
On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 09:19 -0600, Anonymous Japhering via evolution-
list wrote:
> The 3.46.x flatpak series has been a total disaster for me.
> Mysterious segfaults after 15 or so actions.
This is (probably) due to the bug in libsoup, which has been fixed but
that fix has not made it to the rele
On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 20:09 +0100, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> it was pointed out several times that Evolution downgrades are
> sometimes a problem regarding the user data/settings. Downgrades of
> any software can suffer from this issues.
Of course. I didn't mean to suggest that som
On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 15:08 -0600, Tim McConnell via evolution-list
wrote:
> I'm on Evolution version 3.46.1-1 & Libsoup version 3.74.3-
> 1(testing).
I don't think there's any such thing as libsoup 3.74.3. The most
recent libsoup released is 3.2.2.
Did you mean *2*.74.3?
___
I'm using flatpak Evolution 3.46.1 on Ubuntu 20.04 and I'm seeing
something extremely odd in the calendar, on the "Work Week" display.
Today is Wednesday Nov 16th at 1:45pm. If I use "Day" view and select
today (via the "Select Today" button) then it shows correctly: I get
the correct day, the re
On Wed, 2022-11-16 at 19:58 +0100, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> it's this one:
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/-/issues/2097
Oh yes, so it is. Thanks Milan!
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your lis
On Wed, 2022-11-16 at 13:52 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> And finally, the midnight date is not tomorrow (17th) but rather
> Tuesday (15th)... maybe because the first day shown in my work week
> is Monday (14th)? Seems like an odd choice.
Did that fix address this bit too? Or i
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 08:49 +0200, Gary Curtin wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-08-19 at 22:59 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Gary, perhaps it just happened by accident, when you trimmed the
> > quote, but the quote is not marked as a quote.
> >
> > This happens regularly with Evolution when changing from HT
On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 17:16 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> It all depends on your distro. LTS or Enterprise versions tend not
> to majorly update things for stability. But whereas most such distros
> are happy to update minor versions because they are usually bug
> fixes, Ubuntu, for some reason, seem
On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 12:33 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> All that being said, there is currently an upgrade to Evolution 3.28.5
> in the Ubuntu 18.04 "proposed" repo.
FYI as of this morning Evolution 3.28.5 hit the "bionic-updates"
repository in Ubuntu 18.04 so everyone o
On Sat, 2019-07-20 at 13:00 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-07-20 at 01:25 +0100, James Freer via evolution-list
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-07-19 at 13:24 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> >
> > > this is a list for Evolution development.
> >
>
On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 16:52 +0100, Thomas Prost wrote:
> The question that might annoy you: Which distro usually comes with
> the latest evolution version at the moment ?
I think Fedora usually has the most up-to-date versions of Gnome and
Evolution, the most quickly after they are released.
Foll
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 09:16 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via evolution-
list wrote:
> {
> "name": "bogofilter",
> "buildsystem": "simple",
> "build-commands": [
> "cd ./bogofilter/ && echo \"# Skip for Flatpak
> build\" > doc/Makefile.am &&
On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 16:41 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 09:16 -0500, Japhering, Anonymous via
> evolution-list wrote:
>
> > My apologies for assuming [...] the Evolution dev team had followed
> > the rest of the software development world in moving away th
Has anyone else noticed that accessing gmail via imapx from Evolution
has gotten extremely slow a number of times over the last week or so?
Sometimes it's fine, then it will be unbearable for a few hours (or
more), then it seems fine again.
Probably it doesn't matter but FYI, I'm using Ubuntu 20.0
On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 22:11 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Click on Folder->Subscriptions and uncheck the Sent folder. You may
> also want to disable that folder in Gmail's IMAP settings.
I thought about that but then I'd have to resubscribe it by hand to use
it. I do actually use my Sent fo
On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 22:58 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Do you have IMAPX enabled for the account?
Yes, it's an "imapx" account type and I have Quick Resync enabled (I
don't know of gmail supports it though) and also "listen for server
change notifications" is checked.
I have "Check for n
So, I'm using Ubuntu 20.04 but to get a newer version of Evolution I'm
using flatpak. Just yesterday I installed the latest flatpak for
Evolution 3.44 and now I'm seeing something odd: I use dark mode on my
system and when HTML messages are shown in the message preview, the
background is dark but
On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 10:06 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> So, I'm using Ubuntu 20.04 but to get a newer version of Evolution
> I'm using flatpak. Just yesterday I installed the latest flatpak for
> Evolution 3.44 and now I'm seeing something odd:
Hm. I might have to drop bac
On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 16:52 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 10:06 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> > So, I'm using Ubuntu 20.04 but to get a newer version of Evolution
> > I'm using flatpak. Just yesterday I installed the latest flatpak
> > for Ev
I don't have any hope that anyone can actually make something useful
from this report, but here goes anyway:
I'm on Ubuntu 20.04 but I'm using the Evolution 3.44.1 flatpak to get a
modern version. I've been using this for a number of months without
problems, including sending other email to this
On Tue, 2022-06-07 at 18:21 +0100, Steve Percival wrote:
> I am currently running Evolution from my Distro's(Ubuntu) Repo but
> want to start using the flatpak version. Is there any documentation
> on migrating from a 'native' version to flatpak?
>
> I am especially interested in how to migrate th
Yesterday I updated my flatpak to Evolution 3.46.0 (from Evolution
3.44.x) and I'm having something of a hard time adjusting. I'm running
it on Ubuntu 20.04 which has native Gnome 3.36.8.
The biggest issue is that this version of Evolution has crashed twice
on me, so far in two days. I was runni
On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 08:26 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> Some info on the debugging of the Flatpak apps is here:
> https://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/debugging.html
Thanks for that info. I started evolution in the background inside a
flatpak --devel container, then attached to it
On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 10:17 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 08:26 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list
> wrote:
> > Some info on the debugging of the Flatpak apps is here:
> > https://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/debugging.html
>
> Hopefully the next time
On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 15:27 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> I just installed org.gnome.Sdk.Debug flatpak, maybe that has the
> right stuff in it?
I suspect that was it because when I attached to Evolution via GDB this
time, it took about 3 minutes to load all the stuff and get me to a
(gdb)
On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 09:46 +0200, Milan Crha via evolution-list wrote:
> Do you have enabled sender's photos, or RSS, or remote content
> loading, or... I do not know off head what all can call libsoup in
> the evolution process while viewing messages, I'm sorry.
Remote content loading is set to
Hi all;
Every so often I notice that there is a huge amount of network traffic
to/from my system, it can last for quite a while (hour+)
I started up nethogs and I can see that the traffic is between
Evolution and the Exchange server on my system, via port 443 (HTTPS) of
course. I mean, things li
On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 19:17 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> That announcement email seems to have been automatically tagged as
> "important" on my systems (Evo 3.44.4). I've noticed it happening
> before but largely ignored it. What is doing it? Is it a general
> "feature" of something in Evolution or
On Thu, 2022-10-20 at 19:29 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> I had assumed it would be something like that. But what is the header
> that controls it
I believe that checkbox adds this email header:
Importance: high
___
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-
On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 21:26 +0200, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
> As long as nobody succeeded, there is nobody who can help other to
> replicate success. It's at least my {,mis}understanding that nobody
> succeeded.
I overwhelmed by all the email about this topic and just deleted it
all.
On Sat, 2022-10-22 at 13:42 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I seem to be getting them now. Trouble is, I'm also getting stuff
> that has absolutely nothing to do with Evolution, despite having set
> a tag (or whatever it's called) to "Evolution".
If you set "Mailing list mode" in your Discours
On Sat, 2022-10-22 at 13:55 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> So the way to get it working as a proper mailing list is by turning
> off Mailing List Mode. So intuitive.
Agreed it's really poorly named. I think the idea is that if you
enable it then it's as if the entire Discourse site becomes o
On Mon, 2022-10-24 at 00:51 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> For those who are interested, see
> https://groups.io/g/evolution-users
>
> It is now, up to you to decide what you want to do.
I have no problems with people signing up to whatever they want, of
course, but I have to say that I'm on one or t
Hi all. I'm trying to push to get some kind of resolution to the
"bogofilter problem" put into Ubuntu 15.04, if possible. I'm using
Ubuntu GNOME as my distro for now and the only real issue I have is that
Evo's bogofilter plugin is not supported:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evoluti
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 17:36 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> I would revert part, or whole, commit [1]. If I read it properly, then
> the only reason is to get the bogofilter path during configure,
> instead of having it hard-coded.
>https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/commit/?id=b46da7735a5f58c3
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 13:11 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 17:36 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> > I would revert part, or whole, commit [1]. If I read it properly, then
> > the only reason is to get the bogofilter path during configure,
> > instead of
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 14:28 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> Actually, looking at this more it seems like you can set the
> BOGOFILTER environment variable to any value and it's used verbatim
> without checking if it exists.
I did create the patch below while looking at things... it allo
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 17:36 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> I would revert part, or whole, commit [1]. If I read it properly, then
> the only reason is to get the bogofilter path during configure,
> instead of having it hard-coded.
Well, life is never simple. It looks like after the change you pointe
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 08:15 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> I agree with you, I'm also not aware of the reason why the change in
> plugins was done, the requirement of having it installed during build
> time looks odd to me too. The only similarity I might see there is the
> rpath (or what's that call
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 08:15 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> Please file a bug report against evolution to (partially) revert the
> two commits, and name them, plus attach your patch there as well.
Milan! You rock! I was laid up in the hospital for a few days and I
get out and find BOTH
https://bugz
On Sun, 2015-02-22 at 15:17 +0100, Jörg Jenetzky wrote:
> Anyway, that's the newest out of the Ubuntu repositories.
The newest _for your release of Mint_ (you don't say which release
you're using, but it seems pretty old). If you update to a newer
version of Mint, you'll get a newer version of Ev
On Sun, 2015-02-22 at 20:12 +0100, Jörg Jenetzky wrote:
> am 22.02.2015 um 19:26 schrieb Paul Smith:
> > On Sun, 2015-02-22 at 15:17 +0100, Jörg Jenetzky wrote:
> >> Anyway, that's the newest out of the Ubuntu repositories.
> >
> > The newest _for your re
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 12:32 +, jug...@ekit.com wrote:
> I am using evolution 3.10.04 on 64-bit Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS and MATE 1.8.1.
>
> Spam filtering has never worked since I upgraded to 14.04. I now see
> that the options to install either Bogofilter or Spam-Assassin are
> missing from the pl
On Sat, 2015-03-07 at 16:23 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> jug...@ekit.com wrote:
> > I am at a loss to understand why Evolution - which has worked pretty
> > much perfectly ever since I moved over to Ubuntu nearly a decade ago -
> > should suddenly start falling over. Has the age-old engineering maxi
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 14:22 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> But again, it's common sense on most lists
It's not "common sense", in any way. Someone who's never used mailing
lists before will not just inherently understand this without needing
instruction.
Rather, it's a learned behavior that is obt
Hi all. This has bugged me for years but never enough to complain about
it (until now, I guess :)). I wonder if it's just me, or just my setup,
or what. I'm currently using Evolution 3.12.10 but I've seen this for a
number of releases (maybe always?)
I order my folders by Received (Ascending) s
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 11:31 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> It's never been completely clear to me what these ordering really mean
> when combined with threading.
I'm not so worried about the order in which different threads are
displayed. But within a single thread it seems to me that whatev
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 16:56 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I don't have a custom sort order, and I also see the saner behaviour
> you describe, Patrick. If I delete a message, focus moves to the next
> message below it in the display. Not the next newer message in the
> mailbix which may be els
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 07:52 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> it uses the tree, basically what you see in UI, positioning based on
> the selected row index. There is some influence of collapsed threads,
> usually above the selected message. I recall a bug with a race
> condition on the positioning, two
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 10:20 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> The most recent version of this thread from a couple of weeks ago
> starts
> here:
>
> https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/2015-March/msg00032.html
Just a note, Iain submitted a patch this week for this for the next
Ubuntu 15.04 re
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 07:50 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> I'll follow up if/when I get any fresh detail.
Aha! Interesting! I just got it to happen again and noticed something
important. I had a thread like this:
--> Joe v help with thisToday 00:57
Bob hel
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 15:18 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > In the above situation, I use C-d to delete the current message. I
> > thought the problem was that the cursor then skipped the next message
> > but what happens is more subtle than that: the cursor does correctly go
> > to the next message
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 10:04 -0700, Tim Wescott wrote:
> Paul: I'm not sure how much influence you have, but I'm (a) very much
> interested in seeing this fix applied to 14.04, and (b) using 14.04
> specifically because it's an LTS version and not just to be a jerk: I
> use Ubuntu for my work machin
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 12:39 -0700, Tim Wescott wrote:
> Paul, I can no longer even figure out how to navigate to a spot to
> report a bug in the new Ubuntu site.
>
> Can you post a link to the bug listing? I'll get to find out if my
> login still works, and I can squeak in harmony with you about
On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 18:28 +, Pete Biggs wrote:
> Finally, there are some pages out there giving you hints on how to
> build Evo from source. Paul Smith has a page here
>
> http://mad-scientist.net/welcome-to-the-lab/gnome-evolution-from-source/
>
> but I think it hasn&#x
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 13:36 -0400, a.gnome wrote:
> Is there a best-guess release date for Evolution 3.16?
It was released last week; I guess Milan forgot to CC this list:
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-hackers/2015-March/msg1.html
> Hello,
> this is just a notice that evo
I'm using Evolution 3.12.11 (on Ubuntu GNOME 15.04). I used Gnome's
Online Accounts to add two different GMail accounts plus a traditional
IMAP account at my ISP. All are using IMAPX types in Evo.
Up until today, all was fine. However, suddenly most of my previous
email in the two gmail account
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 08:16 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> the only left option I can think of is that the missing messages are
> marked either as Junk or as Deleted. These messages are not shown in
> regular folders.
>
> You can View->Show Deleted Messages, but the Junk messages are shown
> in the Ju
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 16:31 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> You might want to turn off junk processing for Gmail accounts.
I checked and it's off. It could be that when I first started Evolution
it was on and it munged all my email (I created the accounts first using
Gnome's online account ma
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 11:20 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote:
> Thank you. What is ppa for 3.16.3. I obtained 3.16.0 from Fabies
> Tassin's ppa. No evidence of 3.16.3 is there.
Unfortunately there is no official version of Evolution 3.16 available
for Ubuntu. I asked about this:
https://lists.ubu
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 18:18 +0200, Tom wrote:
> I'm often noticed - particularly on this list, that my Evolution
> packages are pretty old, even ancient (and here it's 3.2.3 as it came
> with Precise and it will doggonit stay as long as Precise stays or
> I'll find a safe way to do, what Emre Ereno
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 20:38 +0200, Roy Reese wrote:
> Version numbers at the moment exaggerate the situation a bit given
> that version numbers in Evo were changed to match Gnome.
Although you're right that Evo in Ubuntu 15.04 is only one version
behind the latest, it's misleading because Evo only
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 00:09 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
> If you are not experienced in compiling stuff, I strongly recommend
> you to upgrade to Ubuntu 15.04 and then simply add the PPA I've given
> to use 3.16 which is pretty OK.
It's great to have this PPA, but Evo 3.16.0 has some pretty signif
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 00:33 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote:
> > For me, it's less stable than the latest 3.12.x.
> Depends on use case as I said. 3.12 does not support Webkit2 HTML
> composing so not possible to use it at work for me. 3.16 may have bugs
> but it has less on EWS and does webkit
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 09:38 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote:
> I apologize for not putting my question in the correct format. So, is
> anyone on this list successfully using 16.3.3 on Ubuntu 15.10? I want to
> make
> sure that I am not pursuing a dead-end if no one else has been successful.
> I
On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 12:29 +0200, Herr Oswald wrote:
> > As far as I'm aware the Ubuntu maintainers for Evolution haven't worked
> > on getting 3.16 into the latest version. The last email exchange I had
> > with them implied it was some amount of work (I'm not really sure why
> > but mostly seem
On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 13:52 +0200, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> Yes, I know it's not the "normal" way but it's the way I have always
> done it... :) I am a developer and I run my IDE on one desktop on
> display 2 and my web browser on a different desktop on the same
> display, databaseadmin app on y
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 09:42 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote:
> Over the weekend, I was able to get the i386 version of Ubuntu 15.10
> Gnome to install on a hp-compaq dx2200 minitower (2007 vintage). This
> distribution came with Evolution 3.12.11 already installed. Gnome
> version is 3.16.2. I real
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 10:12 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote:
> I posted on this list as the Ubuntu variant I tested is the one reportedly
> built by the Gnome-3 team, and it uses the Gnome desktop, not the desktop
> favored by Ubuntu developers. Also, unlike the regular Ubuntu distros that
> come
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 16:15 +0200, Tom wrote:
> ... or better ask them to continuously upgrade to a recent version
> even in LTSs !
That's not possible. Evolution is a Gnome application, and relies
extensively on the Gnome infrastructure. It's not like Thunderbird or
Firefox, for example, or eve
On Tue, 2015-10-13 at 12:54 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > What is the difficulty to remove the bugs
>
> The difficulty is that manpower is limited. Your patches are highly
> welcome to fix problems faster.
The best thing to do is to go help the WebKit folks, and/or follow the
bug there as menti
On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 14:18 -0400, John Lauterbach wrote:
> In what order do the following DEB files need to be installed?
Usually if you just put them all on the command line (or run "dpkg -i
*.deb") then dpkg will figure it out.
___
evolution-list ma
On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 20:44 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >Usually if you just put them all on the command line (or run "dpkg -i
> >*.deb") then dpkg will figure it out.
>
> Only if all dependencies are already installed. If the dependencies
> are not installed, than dpkg will not install the packa
On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 16:26 -0200, Jorge wrote:
> I am waiting for Gnome 3.18 to arrive in the regular gnome3 PPA.
Just to keep your expectations in perspective, that almost never
happens. In my experience the gnome3 PPA just has newer/fixed versions
of the same level of Gnome package.
For examp
On Fri, 2015-11-20 at 17:34 -0200, Jorge wrote:
> Thank you for the information. Have you enabled gnome3-staging?
I haven't. In fact, I've just this week upgraded my system from Ubuntu
GNOME 15.04 to Ubuntu GNOME 15.10, so I've just moved to GNOME 3.16.
If I did decide to go to staging the only
Hi all; I've just upgraded to Ubuntu GNOME 15.10 which comes with GNOME
3.16 inlcuding Evolution 3.16.5.
Overall everything is fine but there is one bizarre thing that I don't
remember hearing about: even when I send an email in "HTML" mode, the
font is always fixed-width. This is in "Normal" par
On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 19:18 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> Overall everything is fine but there is one bizarre thing that I don't
> remember hearing about: even when I send an email in "HTML" mode, the
> font is always fixed-width. This is in "Normal" paragrap
On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 11:40 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> evolution 3.16.x is the first release with the WebKitGTK+ based
> composer, the previous old GtkHTML composer had been replaced. One
> consequence is that the HTML messages understand CSS also in the
> composer.
Yeah, I remember that.
> I cur
On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 14:56 +0100, Tomas Popela wrote:
> It's exactly as you said. It was already fixed for Evolution 3.18.,
> see
> [0].
>
> [0] - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753702
OK thanks I'll file a Launchpad bug and hopefully this can be backported
to 3.16.
_
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 13:21 -0500, dave boland wrote:
> Am I correct in thinking POP did download the messages for local
> storage?
Correct. This is the major difference between POP and IMAP.
POP is a simple delivery facility for email: when you access it it
downloads the entire mailbox from the
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 13:48 -0500, dave boland wrote:
> Thanks for the insight. There is an IMAP option in Evolution to
> synchronize the email, but I have not found much info about this
> option.
> Does anyone know what it does and the pros/cons?
>
> My objective is to have a local copy (on my
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 14:45 -0500, dave boland wrote:
> This may be what I do, but for now (and rest of a very busy December),
> I'm looking for an easier way. I guess that may be a monthly combing
> my email to see what needs to be saved, then copying it to a folder.
> I admit, I have been fat
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 15:19 -0500, dave boland wrote:
> My isp has a 90 day limit that I did not know about. The only
> alternative is tw, and I doubt that the will be a big improvement.
Ugh. I'm not sure why you're restricted to only those two alternatives,
but that's a bummer. You could try g
On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 09:11 -0500, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 14:56 +0100, Tomas Popela wrote:
> > It's exactly as you said. It was already fixed for Evolution 3.18.,
> > see
> > [0].
> >
> > [0] - https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cg
On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 13:26 -0500, Mark Foley wrote:
> > As others have said, it appears that 3.10 on Ubuntu 14.04 is broken in
> > various ways (it's to do with the Ubuntu packaging - 3.10 was fine on
> > other systems). 3.10 is also very old now and unsupported.
>
> So, your recommendation? Sho
On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:08 -0500, Mark Foley wrote:
> Yes, I quite understand about the whole version/package delay thing.
> I've also used Slackware for years which is even more dramatic in this
> respect. However, I though I was using the "latest" stable version.
>
> The http://www.ubuntu.com/d
On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 11:19 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 12:03 +0100, Tom wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 06.12.2015, 22:17 -0500 schrieb David Elwell:
> > (...)
> > >
> > > Replaced Ubuntu 14.04 with 15.10 (Evolution 3.16.5) yesterday. All
> > > appears Ok. Thank you all
I'm using Evo 3.16.5 on Ubuntu GNOME 15.10. I have 2 GMail accounts
and one IMAP (ISP) account configured.
Yesterday I noticed that I had a message in one of my GMail accounts
that wouldn't go away from Evo and if I tried to delete it Evo went
into some kind of constant download loop. I decided
On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 15:50 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Now all of a sudden Bogofilter is no longer working. Spam is not
> filtered out of my inbox and I can see that the timestamp on my
> bogofilter wordlist does not change when I fetch new email. I can
> still mark messages as junk
On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 09:31 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> to properly do any spam filtering evolution needs to download whole
> message and pass it to the spam-detection software
> (bogofilter/spamassassin). The error says that the message download
> failed, though the reason ("junk-test") is rather m
On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 16:33 -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> But as above, I see all spam email being determined inconclusive:
>
> Sender 'Wireless Security Camera Options <
> wirelesssecuritycameraopti...@croakita.top>' in book? 0
> Junk filter classification: inconc
On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 16:29 +0100, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> I invariably do updates while logged in and using stuff. I then
> decide what needs to be restarted, or if I have to log out, or the
> system needs to be rebooted. On Fedora there's a useful utility
> called tracer that helps decide th
1 - 100 of 431 matches
Mail list logo
