On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 08:15 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: > I agree with you, I'm also not aware of the reason why the change in > plugins was done, the requirement of having it installed during build > time looks odd to me too. The only similarity I might see there is the > rpath (or what's that called) approach on Linux-es, aka once you link > against a library it is always at the path it was in the runtime. Not > that I'd agree to follow this semantic for junk plugins. > > Please file a bug report against evolution to (partially) revert the > two commits, and name them, plus attach your patch there as well. CC > me on the bug too, thus I'll get to it sooner. I'm currently (heavy-) > breaking other stuff in the data server, but once it's done I'd like > to follow on this issue for 3.14.0.
I filed: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743109 _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
