Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-15: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
That all looks fine, thanks!
Ben.
> On Aug 31, 2018, at 9:41 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>
> On Aug 29, 2018, at 12:17 AM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>> §2"
>> - Definition of "Domain Name": I don't profess to be a naming expert, but
>> this
>>
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-13: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-session-signal-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
> On Jul 3, 2017, at 5:05 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>
> On Jul 3, 2017, at 6:04 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>> Is there something to be gained by going out on the "believed to be
>> complete" limb?
>
> The idea was to dare people to contradict the statement. S
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-aggressiveuse-09: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-key-tag-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
On 6 Dec 2016, at 13:08, Paul Hoffman wrote:
In section 3.1, is there a reason the requirement in paragraph 2 does
not
get a 2119 keywords, when the requirement in the first paragraph
does?
They seem similar in impact.
The paragraph is:
If a priming query does not get a response, the rec
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
On 11 Sep 2016, at 3:16, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 03:51:08PM -0700,
> Ben Campbell wrote
> a message of 25 lines which said:
>
>> One minor question: In section 2, paragraph 3, which behavior is
>> "this behavior"? The continuing to
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-04: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-03: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
On 5 Aug 2016, at 16:05, Wes Hardaker wrote:
"Ben Campbell" writes:
[everything else addressed but I had a question about this last one:]
-8: Seems like there could be more to say about the potential
consequences about the “fail or proceed without security”
decision
in 6
an
Thanks for the response. Discussion inline, with things that appear to
be addressed removed.
Ben.
On 8 Jul 2016, at 16:26, Wes Hardaker wrote:
"Ben Campbell" writes:
[...]
- 1.2, 2nd paragraph: Is "full non-support" effectively different
from
"non-support&qu
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-roadblock-avoidance-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however
On 24 Feb 2016, at 23:24, Dave Lawrence wrote:
> Ben Campbell writes:
>> I agree with Stephen's DISCUSS, and his comment about mentioning that
>> this documents rather than recommends existing behavior in the abstract.
>> (Or at least closer to the beginning of the
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet-06: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
On 7 Jan 2016, at 6:56, sara wrote:
=== Editorial===
-1: "... TCP is henceforth a REQUIRED ..."
Since the normative language is strengthened in section 5, the
REQUIRED
seems redundant here. I'd suggest stating this without the 2119
keyword.
This mimics exactly what was done in the original
On 7 Jan 2016, at 5:34, sara wrote:
On 6 Jan 2016, at 20:08, Ben Campbell wrote:
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive-05: No Objection
--
COMMENT
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-05: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive-05: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-qname-minimisation-08: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
On 30 Sep 2015, at 18:08, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On 30 Sep 2015, at 15:32, Ben Campbell wrote:
--
DISCUSS:
--
This is just a process discuss:
The IPR
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback-04: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
On 18 Sep 2015, at 14:40, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On 16 Sep 2015, at 13:31, Ben Campbell wrote:
I'm balloting "yes" because I think a document like this should
exist.
But I share the question others have raised about why publish this
version if a newer version is coming soon.
Ju
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-04: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
Hi, thanks for the response. Comments inline--I've deleted text that
doesn't seem to require further discussion.
Ben.
On 8 Jul 2015, at 21:59, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however
33 matches
Mail list logo
