On 6 Dec 2016, at 13:08, Paul Hoffman wrote:
In section 3.1, is there a reason the requirement in paragraph 2 does
not
get a 2119 keywords, when the requirement in the first paragraph
does?
They seem similar in impact.
The paragraph is:
If a priming query does not get a response, the recursive resolver
needs to retry the query with a different target address from the
configuration.
The "needs to" is there because it describes the steps given in RFC
1035. It does not create a new requirement.
Works for me, thanks!
Ben.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
