That all looks fine, thanks! Ben.
> On Aug 31, 2018, at 9:41 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote: > > On Aug 29, 2018, at 12:17 AM, Ben Campbell <b...@nostrum.com> wrote: >> ยง2" >> - Definition of "Domain Name": I don't profess to be a naming expert, but >> this >> definition doesn't seem very satisfying. > > It was unsatisfying to everyone, but deemed better than the nothing that we > had before this. It would be grand if someone (more likely the IAB than the > IESG) pulled together a work team to answer "what is a name, really, when you > think hard about it?" Domain names would be a subset of this (if there was a > usable answer). > >> It potentially defines things that I >> wouldn't consider domain names. > > We tried to prevent that, but we wanted to keep to defining "domain names" > without prejudice of DNS names. > >> Is there no representation, intent, or other >> context that distinguishes an ordered list of labels that is a domain name >> from >> your garden variety ordered lists of labels? (or is the point of this that >> they >> cannot be distinguished?) > > The latter. > >> - Definition of IDN: 'The current standard, normally called "IDNA2008"...' >> That may not age well. I suggest something to the effect of "The current >> standard at the time of this writing, ..." > > Good point, will add. > > --Paul Hoffman
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
