On 18 Sep 2015, at 14:40, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On 16 Sep 2015, at 13:31, Ben Campbell wrote:
I'm balloting "yes" because I think a document like this should
exist.
But I share the question others have raised about why publish this
version if a newer version is coming soon.
Just to emphasize what I have said in earlier responses: please don't
expect a newer version "soon".
Got it, okay.
This is listed as informational, but it was last called as a BCP. I'm
not
sure if that matters, since a BCP would have been held to as high or
higher a standard than an informational RFC.
If we succeed at publishing the next version, there will be trickier
choices for publication level, since we might be updating STDs.
Understood.
SoA gets mentioned a few times, but If there is a definition, I
failed to
find it.
The name "SOA" is never expanded in the base RFCs. The closest they
come it to call it the "start of a zone of authority", which would
have come out SOAZOA or maybe SOZA, so we didn't try to spell it out.
Aren't there other "terms people use but aren't explicitly defined in
the RFCs" in the draft?
Thanks!
Ben.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
