On 11 Sep 2016, at 3:16, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 03:51:08PM -0700, > Ben Campbell <b...@nostrum.com> wrote > a message of 25 lines which said: > >> One minor question: In section 2, paragraph 3, which behavior is >> "this behavior"? The continuing to use cached data under the cut, or >> the cached non-existence itself? > > Cached non-existence. It was clear before but the later addition of > paragraph 2 made it ambiguous. Thanks for noticing. I suggest to > replace paragraph 3 with: > > Another exception is that a validating resolver MAY decide to > implement the "NXDOMAIN cut" behaviour (described in the first > paragraph of this section) only when the NXDOMAIN response has been > validated with DNSSEC. See Section 8 for the rationale. >
That works for me. Thanks! Ben. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
