On 11 Sep 2016, at 3:16, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 03:51:08PM -0700,
>  Ben Campbell <b...@nostrum.com> wrote
>  a message of 25 lines which said:
>
>> One minor question: In section 2, paragraph 3, which behavior is
>> "this behavior"? The continuing to use cached data under the cut, or
>> the cached non-existence itself?
>
> Cached non-existence. It was clear before but the later addition of
> paragraph 2 made it ambiguous. Thanks for noticing. I suggest to
> replace paragraph 3 with:
>
> Another exception is that a validating resolver MAY decide to
> implement the "NXDOMAIN cut" behaviour (described in the first
> paragraph of this section) only when the NXDOMAIN response has been
> validated with DNSSEC.  See Section 8 for the rationale.
>

That works for me.

Thanks!

Ben.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to