Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis-05: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm balloting "yes" under the assumption this is intended as proposed standard. 6.2.1.1: Now that clients SHOULD pipeline, is it enough to say servers SHOULD expect it? Seems like a MUST would be in order. === Editorial=== -1: "... TCP is henceforth a REQUIRED ..." Since the normative language is strengthened in section 5, the REQUIRED seems redundant here. I'd suggest stating this without the 2119 keyword. - 5, 2nd to last paragraph: I concur with Barry on the unclear antecedent of "It". _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
