On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 5:35 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:17:02 +0100
> Eike Rathke wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Monday, 2024-11-11 17:12:19 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> >
> > > Then with v128.4.0 on 2024-10-28 also on f40
> > > (no link here anymore, I excluded ppc64le on f40 to g
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 05:51:18PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> The original request to change the term "karma" in Bodhi was
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/4321
>
> I see some points which are in favor to the renaming:
> - we are using the term like a "joke" while it has
* Florian Weimer:
> * Eike Rathke:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the last weeks, Thunderbird updates evolved a behaviour that they
>> FTBFS on ppc64le.
>>
>> It first started with v128.3.2 on 2024-10-17 on f42,
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=124917502
>> unhelpfully with
>> https://koj
Deps will be rebuilt in a side tag. This involves an ABI and octave
module api update.
libsvm
mathgl
mmc
mpsolve
NLopt
octave-brain2mesh
octave-communications
octave-control
octave-dicom
octave-doctest
octave-flexiblas
octave-general
octave-gsl
octave-image
octave-interval
octave-io
octave-iso2
Please note that the upcoming tinyxml2 10.0.0 update is accompanied by
an ABI bump to 10, but it's still API compatible. All consumers build
fine in COPR[1], so I'll proceed rebuilding them in the side-tag
f42-build-side-100118 shortly:
$ fedrq wrsrc -F name -s tinyxml2
Macaulay2 (build-only)
ags
On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 3:19 PM Mattia Verga via devel
wrote:
> For updates, the term "karma" is used as the sum of all karma|feedback
> submitted by users, so I plan to rename this to "rating".
I dislike the term rating. Maybe just remove
the term karma, and simply count the thumbs
(stable by
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 11:58:39AM +0100, Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
> Well, I am very sad about this step and I feel very sorry that you are
> trying to remove the word karma from the process. I believe that Karma
> denotes one of the most powerful, the most noble, and the most fair
> principles of this
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:17:02 +0100
Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, 2024-11-11 17:12:19 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
>
> > Then with v128.4.0 on 2024-10-28 also on f40
> > (no link here anymore, I excluded ppc64le on f40 to get the build out).
>
> That was https://koji.fedoraproject.org/ko
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:19:38 +0100
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024, 11:03 Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > seems ImageMagick 7.1.1.40 comes with an ABI change
> >
> > it drops libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.0)(64bit)
> > and has libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.2)(64
Hi,
seems ImageMagick 7.1.1.40 comes with an ABI change
it drops libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.0)(64bit)
and has libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.2)(64bit) instead.
This sounds wrong ...
Dan
--
___
devel mailing list -- d
Hey All,
We’re calling on you to explore and test the new *Anaconda WebUI* in Fedora
Rawhide! The WebUI is a significant evolution of Fedora's installer,
designed to enhance user experience and modernize system installations.
The Test Week will run from 2024-11-11 through 2024-11-18. QA and Anaco
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 12:05 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 5:59 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
>
>> Well, I am very sad about this step and I feel very sorry that you are
>> trying to remove the word karma from the process. I believe that Karma
>> denotes one of the most powerful, the
On Mon, 2024-11-11 at 11:58 +0100, Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
> Well, I am very sad about this step and I feel very sorry that you
> are trying to remove the word karma from the process. I believe that
> Karma denotes one of the most powerful, the most noble, and the most
> fair principles of this world,
Well, I am very sad about this step and I feel very sorry that you are
trying to remove the word karma from the process. I believe that Karma
denotes one of the most powerful, the most noble, and the most fair
principles of this world, because traditionally it is above this world.
Kudos, or anythin
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 5:59 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
> Well, I am very sad about this step and I feel very sorry that you are
> trying to remove the word karma from the process. I believe that Karma
> denotes one of the most powerful, the most noble, and the most fair
> principles of this world,
Dne 08. 11. 24 v 21:50 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 08. 11. 24 15:44, David Bold wrote:
The policy is applied:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RROZC3KFCF6G4RRMKEM4NXJ4PTFFROTT/
The question is, why is rubygem-hashie not on the list ...
Tha
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 08:47:57AM +0100, Sandro wrote:
> On 11-11-2024 08:27, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 03:18:49PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> > > I have started to move away Bodhi from using the term "karma" to rate
> > > updates. I know this word h
Tested a bit this morning, don't have energy to test everything while sick
however, will try to have energy to test more before the test week ends
18th November if i feel better
Den mån 11 nov. 2024 kl 08:14 skrev Luna Jernberg :
> Will try to help out if i have time and energy, a bit sick at the
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024, 11:03 Dan Horák wrote:
> Hi,
>
> seems ImageMagick 7.1.1.40 comes with an ABI change
>
> it drops libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.0)(64bit)
> and has libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.2)(64bit) instead.
> This sounds wrong ...
>
Indeed it does. I've also gotten at
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20241110.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-2024.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 77
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 17.57 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 09:35:20AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 8:30 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > We wanted to build pesign so we can automatically trigger RISC-V
> > builds, since for some reason (I guess related to this) it hasn't been
> > built for f42 & f41. B
On 11/10/24 11:56 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 12:07:09PM -0600, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
Out of the blue rawhide scratch builds [1]
are now failing and f41 builds [2] are failing
but f40 builds [3] are succeeding and they
are all the same code!
Late Oct I made a release
Hey everyone.
We are working on getting the riscv sig meeting regularly, and we
settled on 16UTC on tuesdays in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on matrix.
Sorry for the short notice.
I whipped up a agenda doc:
https://hackmd.io/SPrxvhU0Sv2l5Ox7zqg01A
Interested parties are encouraged to attend and pa
Never mind...
export LC_ALL="C.UTF-8"
took care of the failure...
steved.
On 11/11/24 1:02 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 11/10/24 11:56 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2024 at 12:07:09PM -0600, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
Out of the blue rawhide scratch builds [1]
are now failing a
- Forwarded message from "Kanagaraj, Raghavan"
-
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:54:32 +
From: "Kanagaraj, Raghavan"
To: "Richard W.M. Jones" , Wei Fu
Subject: RE: Inactive packagers for the F41 cycle
Hi Richard,
I missed this mail to read. Please don’t remove my user name rkanagar
If the word police are involved, we might as well go right to the ideal
name: double-plus-goodness !
In case it's not obvious, I'm opposed to the proposed change. "Karma"
is the best English word to describe what we're doing. Previous builds
of packages benefit us, and we benefit them by testin
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 05:49:59PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> The cause is reported as: (signal: 9, SIGKILL: kill)
> So probably OOM. It could be a genuine toolchain bug, or
> the builders have to little memory assigned relative to core count.
Yeah, as noted it's a balancing act. :(
> (I
Dne 11. 11. 24 v 16:28 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 11. 11. 24 14:38, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 08. 11. 24 v 21:50 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 08. 11. 24 15:44, David Bold wrote:
The policy is applied:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/
message/RROZC3KFCF
Hi,
In the last weeks, Thunderbird updates evolved a behaviour that they
FTBFS on ppc64le.
It first started with v128.3.2 on 2024-10-17 on f42,
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=124917502
unhelpfully with
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=124917674
"No outputs
Hi,
On Monday, 2024-11-11 17:12:19 +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Then with v128.4.0 on 2024-10-28 also on f40
> (no link here anymore, I excluded ppc64le on f40 to get the build out).
That was https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=125295645
Eike
--
GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2
Il 11/11/24 12:12, Kalev Lember ha scritto:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 12:05 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 5:59 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
>>
>>> Well, I am very sad about this step and I feel very sorry that you are
>>> trying to remove the word karma from the process. I believ
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024, 18:52 Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Il 11/11/24 12:12, Kalev Lember ha scritto:
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 12:05 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 5:59 AM Lukas Ruzicka
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Well, I am very sad about this step
On 11. 11. 24 14:38, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 08. 11. 24 v 21:50 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 08. 11. 24 15:44, David Bold wrote:
The policy is applied:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/
message/RROZC3KFCF6G4RRMKEM4NXJ4PTFFROTT/
The question is, why is
* Eike Rathke:
> Hi,
>
> In the last weeks, Thunderbird updates evolved a behaviour that they
> FTBFS on ppc64le.
>
> It first started with v128.3.2 on 2024-10-17 on f42,
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=124917502
> unhelpfully with
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskin
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 at 17:25, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 11:58:39AM +0100, Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
> > Well, I am very sad about this step and I feel very sorry that you are
> > trying to remove the word karma from the process. I believe that Karma
> > denotes one of the most po
For what it is worth I was able to build it on Fedora 41:
```
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
/home/jason/rpmbuild/BUILD/thunderbird-128.4.2-build/BUILDROOT
Wrote: /home/jason/rpmbuild/SRPMS/thunderbird-128.4.2-1.fc41.src.rpm
Wrote:
/home/jason/rpmbuild/RPMS/ppc64le/thund
Hi
I'll be building tesseract-5.5 in the f42-build-side-100090 side tag,
and also rebuilding the following dependencies:
ffmpeg
gimagereader
mupdf
opencv
python-PyMuPDF
R-tesseract
skanpage
zathura-pdf-mupdf
crow-translate
maui-mauikit-imagetools
Sandro
--
___
Le 11/11/2024 à 11:02, Dan Horák a écrit :
Hi,
seems ImageMagick 7.1.1.40 comes with an ABI change
it drops libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.0)(64bit)
and has libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.2)(64bit) instead.
This sounds wrong ...
See https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/pul
OLD: Fedora-eln-2024.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20241112.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 27
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 12:06 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024, 18:52 Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
>>
>> Il 11/11/24 12:12, Kalev Lember ha scritto:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 12:05 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 5:59 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
>
40 matches
Mail list logo
