On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:19:38 +0100
Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024, 11:03 Dan Horák <d...@danny.cz> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > seems ImageMagick 7.1.1.40 comes with an ABI change
> >
> > it drops libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.0)(64bit)
> > and has libMagickWand-7.Q16HDRI.so.10(VERS_10.2)(64bit) instead.
> > This sounds wrong ...
> >
> 
> Indeed it does. I've also gotten at least one FTI issue filed due to this
> change already.
> 
> I've -1 karma'd the corresponding f41 update, but it's a Packit managed
> package so I'm quite sure bodhi comments just go into the big /dev/null.

isn't there a policy that requires packages built by bots to pass all
the CI in bodhi? It would not caught this particular issue, but
still ... Although there could be an ABI check in the CI too.


                Dan
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to