Hello
As many other applications you can use the 32-bit version of Apache
OpenOffice under the 64 bit Windows OS.
Regards
Am 17.01.22 um 17:16 schrieb jadewolf2000:
why is there no x64 version of OpenOffice for Windows yet? I don't know of
anyone that uses a 32-bit version of Wi
why is there no x64 version of OpenOffice for Windows yet? I don't know of
anyone that uses a 32-bit version of Windows anymore.
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com/) Secure Email.
Am 15.01.2018 um 16:28 schrieb FR web forum:
>> If you think it is easy to do then do it.
> Please do not misunderstand me: I did not say that.
Sorry Matthias gave the right hint
Kind regard
--
Mechtilde Stehmann
## Apache OpenOffice
## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
## Debian
> If you think it is easy to do then do it.
Please do not misunderstand me: I did not say that.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Am 15.01.2018 um 16:20 schrieb Mechtilde:
> Hello,
>
>
> Am 15.01.2018 um 16:04 schrieb FR web forum:
>>> I think this is not easy to do for its own reasons. I would like to
>>> get back into official repos one day but I believe we have to do
>>> some other stuff first. So for me it is one topic fu
Hello,
Am 15.01.2018 um 16:04 schrieb FR web forum:
>> I think this is not easy to do for its own reasons. I would like to
>> get back into official repos one day but I believe we have to do
>> some other stuff first. So for me it is one topic further down on my
>> lengthy to do list.
>
> Sure,
> I think this is not easy to do for its own reasons. I would like to
> get back into official repos one day but I believe we have to do
> some other stuff first. So for me it is one topic further down on my
> lengthy to do list.
Sure, I think that it was easy, it would have been done.
But if pro
Arch Linux provides AOO as community package.
Gentoo looks like they provide a package too. (Currently the package service is
down, so I could not check their repo. I do not have any Gentoo box active at
this point.)
Please keep also in mind that we are recommend to download only from our site.
Hello Rory
Am 14.01.2018 um 19:15 schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
> On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 09:56:32 -0800 Dave Fisher
> wrote:
>
>> The Linux distributors made their own choice. If my recollection is
>> correct some of them directly supported LibO development.
>
>
> I felt it was a manifestation of the r
Hello,
and some more additions.
it is not easy to package Apache OpenOffice under the rules of most of
the distribution, like Opensuse, Fedora/CentOS Debian and Ubuntu.
You have to do much work for this. Also you have to provide fixes for
security and other important issues
In the case of Debia
t; On Jan 14, 2018, at 7:13 AM, FR web forum wrote:
> >
> > Hello team,
> > Since fork, only LibO is provided as office suite in Linux repositories.
> > Apache sets some projects like tomcat or httpd as packages.
> > Why not for AOO?
> >
> > -
e fork, only LibO is provided as office suite in Linux repositories.
> Apache sets some projects like tomcat or httpd as packages.
> Why not for AOO?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.or
FR web forum wrote:
provided as office suite in Linux repositories.
It's their choice, driven by commercial interests in some cases.
Since they won't do the work, we take care of it (we actually always
did) by providing RPMs and DEBs that will run on most distributions.
One could make a fur
Hello team,
Since fork, only LibO is provided as office suite in Linux repositories.
Apache sets some projects like tomcat or httpd as packages.
Why not for AOO?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For
On 25/07/2017 Marcus wrote:
Am 25.07.2017 um 08:02 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
The explicit URL was added by me since it was cumbersome to open
http://www.openoffice.org/tools/unowinreg_prebuild/680/ and
downloading the library manually.
I've seen that it is part of the build script
("build_aoo64b
Am 25.07.2017 um 08:02 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 24/07/2017 Marcus wrote:
Am 21.07.2017 um 02:38 schrieb Raphael Bircher:
If you forget unwinreg.dll, you get a message, with a wget and a
download link. Why we don't donload this directly.
good question. Maybe some devs can help here.
On 24/07/2017 Marcus wrote:
Am 21.07.2017 um 02:38 schrieb Raphael Bircher:
If you forget unwinreg.dll, you get a message, with a wget and a
download link. Why we don't donload this directly.
good question. Maybe some devs can help here. Is it possible to
integrate this into the build s
Am 21.07.2017 um 02:38 schrieb Raphael Bircher:
If you forget unwinreg.dll, you get a message, with a wget and a
download link. Why we don't donload this directly.
good question. Maybe some devs can help here. Is it possible to
integrate this into the build system or are there reasons n
Hi all
If you forget unwinreg.dll, you get a message, with a wget and a download
link. Why we don't donload this directly.
Regards, Raphael
--
My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Hi Samuel
"Files that's used
Some files that need to be uppdated is in use at the moment.
The following software use files that need to be updated at
installation. Close the software and klick Try again to proccesed.
Google Chrome (Process Id: 1440)"
This means that the OpenOffice installe
x27;ve donwloaded OpenOffice:
Please download only from here: "http://www.openoffice.org/download";
Marcus
Am 04.02.2017 um 05:33 schrieb Samuel Natan Freiholtz:
I was about to install OpenOffice when I was informed I had to close Google
Chrome because changes needed to be made to tha
CC'ing Samuel as he is not subscribed to this mailing list.
Am 04.02.2017 um 20:48 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
I think you started the install directly through chrome. That's why it
refers to it. If you start the installer from your download file it should
not reference to chrome.
Did yo
I think you started the install directly through chrome. That's why it
refers to it. If you start the installer from your download file it should
not reference to chrome.
Did you check if OpenOffice was running?
Samuel Natan Freiholtz schrieb am Sa., 4.
Feb. 2017, 20:22:
> Hi Marcus!
&g
__
Från: Marcus
Skickat: den 4 februari 2017 09:41
Till: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Kopia: Samuel Natan Freiholtz
Ämne: Re: Why do OpneOffice need to change Google Chrome?!
Am 04.02.2017 um 05:33 schrieb Samuel Natan Freiholtz:
> I was about to install OpenOffice when I was informed I h
Am 04.02.2017 um 05:33 schrieb Samuel Natan Freiholtz:
I was about to install OpenOffice when I was informed I had to close Google
Chrome because changes needed to be made to that application by OpenOffice.
Why? Why Do OpenOffice need to change Google Chrome??
OpenOffice doesn't c
Hi
I was about to install OpenOffice when I was informed I had to close Google
Chrome because changes needed to be made to that application by OpenOffice.
Why? Why Do OpenOffice need to change Google Chrome??
/Samuel
Agree with Rob and Andrea that the pages serve a purpose.
My reason for filing the original bug was simply that during translation into
Norwegian,
I saw several pages were outdated, talking about MSO 2003 EOL etc.
Instead of discussing details of wording here, why don’t someone who cares for
The "Why" page is important and shouldn't be discarded.
The advantages over MS Office are obvious...
It is far less obvious how AOO is currently better than LO / Gnome Office /
Calligra Suite.
The references to scientific papers in Gnumeric home page are a good
example for a convin
r themselves.
>
I think you are missing the point of this page and the other "why"
pages. These are intended as landing pages for those arriving via
search engine queries looking for these very benefits. We get around
20K referrals/month via Google, for example, to these pages
nal Message-
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, January 9, 2016 14:05
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Updating the WHY section of www.openoffice.org
>
> Jan Høydahl wrote:
> > Yes, remove the Office 2003 EOL page
>
>
two:
* http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_new_computers.html
You are not required to spend $100, $200 or more for a copy of Microsoft
Office
This one can stay. What's wrong with it? We shouldn't be ashamed of
telling people that OpenOffice is free and that this is an advantage.
Yes, remove the Office 2003 EOL page
But also consider rephrasing these two:
* http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_new_computers.html
You are not required to spend $100, $200 or more for a copy of Microsoft
Office
* http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_easy.html:
Studies have proved it is easier
+1 on removing the page.
> -Original Message-
> From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, January 9, 2016 04:59
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Updating the WHY section of www.openoffice.org
>
>
>
> On 01/08/2016
On 01/08/2016 07:28 PM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
Hi
I filed bug https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126777 about outdated WHY sub
page "Office 2003 EOL”.
See issue for details. Dennis requested that the discussion continues in this
mailing list.
My initial concern was that an outdate
Hi
I filed bug https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126777 about outdated WHY
sub page "Office 2003 EOL”.
See issue for details. Dennis requested that the discussion continues in this
mailing list.
My initial concern was that an outdated web page looks really bad, referring to
2014
On 23.02.2015 17:41, Rob Weir wrote:
> [ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
> tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.
>
> 4 PMC votes for this option: Rob,Marcus, Kay and Juergen
Here's another vote (binding) for this alternative.
>
> It looks like Andrea is
[ ] Leave the page as it is.
No one voted for this option
[ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.
4 PMC votes for this option: Rob,Marcus, Kay and Juergen
[ ] Delete the entire page.
3 PMC votes for this option: Dennis, J
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:r...@robweir.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 11:58
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: [Vote] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website
The page in question is here:
http://www.openoffi
Am 02/20/2015 11:55 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
I know we are waiting on Andrea's rewrite, but I would ask why bother to
rewrite.
Here are three reasons why the page should be removed from all language
versions and not just hidden.
(1) How does the PMC even know what this carefully nuanced
I know we are waiting on Andrea's rewrite, but I would ask why bother to
rewrite.
Here are three reasons why the page should be removed from all language
versions and not just hidden.
(1) How does the PMC even know what this carefully nuanced page even says in
another language like Ch
On 19/02/15 20:57, Rob Weir wrote:
> The page in question is here:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html
>
> Voting choices are:
[ ] Leave the page as it is.
[X] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
tone does not fit or ASF ru
For what it's worth (and I'm sure there are some on this list who believe it is
worth very little), I didn't and don't like the GPL-bashing verbiage, precisely
because it is not consistent with ASF statements and leaves ASF open to the
kind of criticism Bradley Kuhn has leveled.
The page was or
On 19/02/15 22:38, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>> Thread for discussion
>
> Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this
> conversation earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like this:
>
> http://markmail.org/message/2ae5vrtevxyizaje
>
> [Andrea] The page provi
Forgive my slipping a discussion on the vote thread with my +101.
I have thought about things and I am going to cast the following vote:
[X] delete the page.
Why?
It does not help the overall OpenOffice community to be making a strong
argument over this issue at this point in time.
it
ete the page
>> and add a link to the faq[1] to your existing 'free' page[2] - I just
>> don't see any value beyond what's already written between those two.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --tim
>>
>> [1] - htt
On 02/19/2015 11:57 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> The page in question is here:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html
>
> Voting choices are:
>
> [ ] Leave the page as it is.
>
> [ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
>
On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
>>> Thread for discussion
>>
>>
>> Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this conversation
>> earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like this:
n is to just delete the page
> and add a link to the faq[1] to your existing 'free' page[2] - I just
> don't see any value beyond what's already written between those two.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --tim
>
> [1] - http://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html#Wh
OK, it seems your offer good lost as the topic got more intensive today.
At least this applies to me. So, sorry from myside.
When the forecast of the vote still remains then you can still do the
rework of the webpage. At least this work should be not for nothing.
Marcus
Am 02/19/2015 10:38
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> Thread for discussion
>
>
> Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this conversation
> earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like this:
>
> http://markmail.org/message/2ae5vrtevxyizaje
>
Unfortu
Rob Weir wrote:
Thread for discussion
Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this
conversation earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like this:
http://markmail.org/message/2ae5vrtevxyizaje
[Andrea] The page provides relevant information in a bad way. It is by
keeping
Rob Weir wrote:
> The page in question is here:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html
>
> Voting choices are:
>
> [ ] Leave the page as it is.
>
> [ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
> tone does not fit or ASF rule
[X] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.
Marcus
Am 02/19/2015 08:57 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
The page in question is here:
http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html
Voting choices are:
[ ] Leave the page as it
license-faq.html#WhatDoesItMEAN
[2] - http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_free.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional comma
Thread for discussion
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
The page in question is here:
http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html
Voting choices are:
[ ] Leave the page as it is.
[ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.
[ ] Delete the entire page.
The vote will last
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> The page in question is here:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html
>
> Voting choices are:
>
> [ ] Leave the page as it is.
>
> [X ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
On 11/08/14 20:25, jan i wrote:
> On 11 August 2014 20:12, Peter Kelly wrote:
>
>> On 11 Aug 2014, at 3:42 pm, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>
>> Question: To what extent is the OO UI frontend code separate from the
>> backend editing, file format handling, and rendering code? I'm thinking in
>> particu
On 11.08.2014 20:25, jan i wrote:
On 11 August 2014 20:12, Peter Kelly wrote:
On 11 Aug 2014, at 3:42 pm, Andre Fischer wrote:
Question: To what extent is the OO UI frontend code separate from the
backend editing, file format handling, and rendering code? I'm thinking in
particular here of m
On 11 Aug 2014, at 3:14 pm, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 11/08/14 09:59, Peter Kelly wrote:
>> An interesting discussion I came across today:
>>
>> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/08/why-is-it-so-hard-to-make-a-java-program-appear-native/
>>
>&
On 11 August 2014 20:12, Peter Kelly wrote:
> On 11 Aug 2014, at 3:42 pm, Andre Fischer wrote:
>
> Question: To what extent is the OO UI frontend code separate from the
> backend editing, file format handling, and rendering code? I'm thinking in
> particular here of mobile - which demands a comp
On 11 Aug 2014, at 3:42 pm, Andre Fischer wrote:
>> Question: To what extent is the OO UI frontend code separate from the
>> backend editing, file format handling, and rendering code? I'm thinking in
>> particular here of mobile - which demands a completely different approach to
>> user experi
On 11.08.2014 09:59, Peter Kelly wrote:
An interesting discussion I came across today:
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/08/why-is-it-so-hard-to-make-a-java-program-appear-native/
I know that the answer to this is not really important, but just in
case. This gives you not 100
On 11/08/14 09:59, Peter Kelly wrote:
> An interesting discussion I came across today:
>
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/08/why-is-it-so-hard-to-make-a-java-program-appear-native/
>
> (and yes I realise OO doesn't use Java for it's UI, but the poi
On 11 August 2014 09:59, Peter Kelly wrote:
> An interesting discussion I came across today:
>
>
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/08/why-is-it-so-hard-to-make-a-java-program-appear-native/
>
> (and yes I realise OO doesn't use Java for it's UI, b
An interesting discussion I came across today:
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/08/why-is-it-so-hard-to-make-a-java-program-appear-native/
(and yes I realise OO doesn't use Java for it's UI, but the points raised apply
to all cross-platform UI toolkits).
Questio
Hi Doug,
On 30.06.2014 16:34, Douglas Mencken wrote:
> I'm here to ask you: why you decided to drop 10.6 support?
Rob already pointed out the discussion thread where this lead to the decision
to support only newer
versions of MacOSX.
> Is it not so "hard" to keep it ru
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Douglas Mencken wrote:
> I'm here to ask you: why you decided to drop 10.6 support?
> Is it not so "hard" to keep it running, isn't it?
>
You can search our mailing list archives for the dev list for the
discussions. For examp
I'm here to ask you: why you decided to drop 10.6 support?
Is it not so "hard" to keep it running, isn't it?
By the way, I'm LO guy, so see my patches, for example:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=core.git;a=commitdiff;h=47b520024a236eac8807a
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 03:24:08 -0700
Jim Michaels wrote:
> why is it so hard to work with ms office files? it should be easy.
>
> expected: there ought to be a setting that changes the default file types for
> open, save, save as (file ops) so that the user is always easily working
why is it so hard to work with ms office files? it should be easy.
expected: there ought to be a setting that changes the default file types for
open, save, save as (file ops) so that the user is always easily working with
his favorite file type (save, save as, and open). but changing the file
.
Does someone know, why master pages of templates are forced to have a
name build from file name?
Kind regards
Regina
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Hello just downloaded 4.0 open office and I can not print it keeps saying
spooling and about some error. I need to print my documents.
thanks
Karen M. Short
Please unsubscribe me.
On 10/7/13, artie...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: artietee
> Date: Mon Oct 7 12:59:20 2013
> New Revision: 1529829
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1529829
> Log:
> CMS commit to ooo-site by artietee
>
> Modified:
> openoffice/ooo-site/tru
other opportunity
than using this interface.
And if it's deprecated, why linking to the DevGuide?
Perhaps a mistake?
Regards
Peter
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e
We have many channels to develop support, you can go to a web forum at
http://forum.openoffice.org/en/ or this user mailing list. If you feel this
is a bug, you can report it at our bugzilla https://issues.apache.org/ooo/
There are options to enable or disable rulers, you can also go to the Tools
Your website tries to pawn people off on each other, twitter, FAQ that don't
apply, "documents", etc. etc. instead of just getting down to giving support.
VERY FRUSTRATING.
So I finally found this email address and hopefully a real person will respond.
I have Open Office 3.3, which came with m
http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/stable/
localized builds:
http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/localized/
Why aren't there any links to older versions?
First of all we would like to make sure our users are using most
recent version to get the most of the software.
Furthermore
table/
localized builds:
http://archive.apache.org/dist/incubator/ooo/localized/
Why aren't there any links to older versions?
First of all we would like to make sure our users are using most recent
version to get the most of the software.
Furthermore, there is also the problem that older ve
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:52 PM, David Coldwell wrote:
> version 3.0 files won't load into version 2.3 so I have to replace 3.0
> with 2.3.
> Why aren't there any links to older versions?
>
>
They are in the archived releases folders. For example, the 2.3
version 3.0 files won't load into version 2.3 so I have to replace 3.0
with 2.3.
Why aren't there any links to older versions?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional comman
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Inge Wallin wrote:
> They are not hand hacked xml but where created specifically for testing the
> respective function by testers employed by Nokia. They where done originally
> for the document viewer application in the Nokia N900 and then later extended
> for th
Rob Weir wrote:
> Does anyone know what LibreOffice has in terms of test documents?
>
Hi Rob,
there is
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/test-files/
, and in-tree application unit tests, e.g.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/sw/qa/core/data
Btw, I vaguely reca
gt;>
>
>> We have an XML "product" in Bugzilla where ODF bugs are categorized,
>
>> as well as other XML-related import/export issues in XHTML, XSLT, etc.
>
>> But if you have a specific set of ODF issues that you think we should
>
>> raise i
;> >> >
> >> >> > I personally think browser based apps are a pig, and doing apps in
> >> >> > JScript is insane. I had Chrome open the other day just with GMail
> >> >> > and it was using over 150 MB of RAM...
> >> >&
ript is insane. I had Chrome open the other day just with GMail and
>> >> > it was using over 150 MB of RAM...
>> >>
>> >> Not really a big problem with modern multi-gig computers (including
>> >> future mobile technologies). Less of a problem than
Hi all,
2013/1/26 Andrea Pescetti
> On 24/01/2013 Inge Wallin wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 21:33:04 Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> Are you planning to be at the KDE conference in July in Bilbao? It
>>> might good to have someone from AOO attend. Aside from the obvious
>>> common interes
On 24/01/2013 Inge Wallin wrote:
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 21:33:04 Rob Weir wrote:
Are you planning to be at the KDE conference in July in Bilbao? It
might good to have someone from AOO attend. Aside from the obvious
common interest in ODF, it would be interesting to see if there are
an
n one device or needs a lot of effort to port across
> >> multi-devices, operating systems etc. To me open standards are worth
> >> paying a bit of a price for in terms of machine resources since the
> >> latter continue to grow and get less expensive.
> >>
> >
since the
>> latter continue to grow and get less expensive.
>>
>> > A thin client virtualized version on the other hand would use the PC´s
>> > CPU and horsepower and deliver great speed to even to lowest powered
>> > devices.
>>
>> Assuming you have some
A thin client virtualized version on the other hand would use the PC´s
> > CPU and horsepower and deliver great speed to even to lowest powered
> > devices.
>
> Assuming you have someone to host it for you. O a global scale that is
> not trivial to do which is probably w
Thanks to the Apache OpenOffice Wikipedia article, I see there's
OpenOffice Anywhere (http://www.ooanywhere.com/) that claims to
provide browser access to OpenOffice 3. OpenOffice Anywhere charges a
fee for this service.
Given Google Docs is free, and AOO is free, I have doubts about the
long-ter
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Ha! it looks as if I had written it with regards to AOO thin client ;)
I´ll try to see if this thing is buildable and I can sort f make a
wrapper-launcher for AOO...
FC
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> That´s fine. So, who wants to add a -vncserver switch to AOO ? ;)
Hmmm I´ve been researching this and it turns out all VNC
implementations out there are GPL.
BUT there´s this interesting solution with an Apache license...
http://www.fre
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
> Skate to where the puck will be
> rather than where it is or has been.
That´s fine. So, who wants to add a -vncserver switch to AOO ? ;)
FC
--
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act
Durante épocas de
On 19 January 2013 11:04, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Ian Lynch wrote:
>> That dies
>> of course rely on having at least a significant minority of drug free
>> competitors!
>>
>> :-)
>
> I think you pasted your reply into the wrong GMail compose window. Or,
> I´m beg
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Ian Lynch wrote:
> That dies
> of course rely on having at least a significant minority of drug free
> competitors!
>
> :-)
I think you pasted your reply into the wrong GMail compose window. Or,
I´m beginning to lose track of where this thread is going. ;)
FC
-
On 18 January 2013 22:16, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> On 13-01-18, at 15:48 , Ian Lynch wrote:
>
>> On 18 January 2013 17:41, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>>
It wasnt an edition more like a mode, you did $ soffice -net and you can
On 13-01-18, at 15:48 , Ian Lynch wrote:
> On 18 January 2013 17:41, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>
>>> It wasnt an edition more like a mode, you did $ soffice -net and you can
>>> have variou users conenected, there was a pertner that even
On 18 January 2013 17:41, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
>> It wasnt an edition more like a mode, you did $ soffice -net and you can
>> have variou users conenected, there was a pertner that even did some Active
>> Directory authentication.
>> ht
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
