For what it's worth (and I'm sure there are some on this list who believe it is 
worth very little), I didn't and don't like the GPL-bashing verbiage, precisely 
because it is not consistent with ASF statements and leaves ASF open to the 
kind of criticism Bradley Kuhn has leveled.

The page was originally written and "discussed" at a time when some factions of 
the PMC were not really entertaining dissent from an agenda of emphasizing the 
differences between AOO and LO/TDF, and I didn't feel it would help for me to 
suggest that AOO should concentrate on engineering and if anything practice 
generosity towards sister projects (which is closer to the Apache Way).

But, since you've called for discussion and vote, I would vote -1 on leaving 
the page as-is, and +1 on changing it as JimJag (VP of Legal Affairs) has asked.

Danese


> On Feb 20, 2015, at 1:28 AM, Rob Weir <r...@robweir.com> wrote:
> 
> Thread for discussion
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to